Literature DB >> 18275271

Rapid decline of influenza vaccine-induced antibody in the elderly: is it real, or is it relevant?

Danuta M Skowronski1, S Aleina Tweed, Gaston De Serres.   

Abstract

Advisory committees have cautioned that influenza vaccine-induced antibody declines more rapidly in the elderly, falling below seroprotective levels within 4 months. We conducted a literature review to assess this assertion. The articles that were included in this review reported antibody levels > or =4 months after influenza immunization in persons > or =60 years old, interpretable in the context of annual influenza vaccine-approval criteria (seroprotection/seroconversion) specified by the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) for the elderly. The final review included 14 studies; 8 of which reported seroprotection rates. Seroprotection exceeding CPMP criteria was maintained > or =4 months after influenza immunization in all 8 of the studies reporting this for the H3N2 component and in 5 of the 7 studies reporting this for the H1N1 and B components. In determining whether CPMP criteria were met at season's end, primary antibody response appeared to be more relevant than secondary antibody decline. Both studies reporting seroprotection rates that failed CPMP criteria > or =4 months after influenza immunization for each of the H1N1 and B components had also reported failed seroprotection at 1 month after immunization. If initially achieved after immunization, seroprotection rates of 70%-100% were maintained not just at 4 months (2 studies) but also at 5 months (2 studies) and even at >6 months (4 studies), for the H3N2 and H1N1 vaccine components. Seroprotection rates appeared less consistent for the B vaccine component, throughout the postimmunization period. Seroconversion appears to vary substantially and inversely with preimmunization titers but not with age. In 2 of 6 studies reporting seroconversion alone, CPMP criteria were still met at 4 months. In the other 4 studies, the main reason for failure at 4 months was primary failure at 1 month. A total of 6 studies compared antibody persistence by age, and no consistent differences were found on that basis. The historic concern that the influenza vaccine-induced antibody response in the elderly declines more rapidly and below seroprotective levels within 4 months of immunization should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18275271     DOI: 10.1086/524146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  64 in total

1.  Unique biomarkers for B-cell function predict the serum response to pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Daniela Frasca; Alain Diaz; Maria Romero; Mitch Phillips; Nicholas V Mendez; Ana Marie Landin; Bonnie B Blomberg
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.823

2.  Prevalence of seroprotection against the pandemic (H1N1) virus after the 2009 pandemic.

Authors:  Danuta M Skowronski; Travis S Hottes; Naveed Z Janjua; Dale Purych; Suzana Sabaiduc; Tracy Chan; Gaston De Serres; Jennifer Gardy; Janet E McElhaney; David M Patrick; Martin Petric
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The generation of memory B cells is maintained, but the antibody response is not, in the elderly after repeated influenza immunizations.

Authors:  Daniela Frasca; Alain Diaz; Maria Romero; Bonnie B Blomberg
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Randomized, controlled trial of high-dose influenza vaccine among frail residents of long-term care facilities.

Authors:  David A Nace; Chyongchiou Jeng Lin; Ted M Ross; Stacey Saracco; Roberta M Churilla; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Does Influenza Vaccination Modify Influenza Severity? Data on Older Adults Hospitalized With Influenza During the 2012-2013 Season in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen S Arriola; Evan J Anderson; Joan Baumbach; Nancy Bennett; Susan Bohm; Mary Hill; Mary Lou Lindegren; Krista Lung; James Meek; Elizabeth Mermel; Lisa Miller; Maya L Monroe; Craig Morin; Oluwakemi Oni; Arthur Reingold; William Schaffner; Ann Thomas; Shelley M Zansky; Lyn Finelli; Sandra S Chaves
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Profiles of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine response using hemagglutination-inhibition titers.

Authors:  Robert M Jacobson; Diane E Grill; Ann L Oberg; Pritish K Tosh; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Persistence of influenza vaccine-induced antibody in lung transplant patients and healthy individuals beyond the season.

Authors:  Jill J Severson; Katelyn R Richards; John J M Moran; Mary S Hayney
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Influenza vaccination and risk of hospitalization in patients with heart failure: a self-controlled case series study.

Authors:  Hamid Mohseni; Amit Kiran; Reza Khorshidi; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Seasonal influenza vaccine and protection against pandemic (H1N1) 2009-associated illness among US military personnel.

Authors:  Matthew C Johns; Angelia A Eick; David L Blazes; Seung-eun Lee; Christopher L Perdue; Robert Lipnick; Kelly G Vest; Kevin L Russell; Robert F DeFraites; Jose L Sanchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Young and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes have optimal B cell responses to the seasonal influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Daniela Frasca; Alain Diaz; Maria Romero; Nicholas V Mendez; Ana Marie Landin; John G Ryan; Bonnie B Blomberg
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.