BACKGROUND: Before pandemic (H1N1) 2009, less than 10% of serum samples collected from all age groups in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, showed seroprotection against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, except those from very elderly people. We reassessed this profile of seroprotection by age in the same region six months after the fall 2009 pandemic and vaccination campaign. METHODS: We evaluated 100 anonymized serum samples per 10-year age group based on convenience sampling. We measured levels of antibody against the pandemic virus by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. We assessed geometric mean titres and the proportion of people with seroprotective antibody levels (hemagglutination inhibition titre ≥ 40). We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate titre thresholds of 80, 20 and 10. RESULTS: Serum samples from 1127 people aged 9 months to 101 years were obtained. The overall age-standardized proportion of people with seroprotective antibody levels was 46%. A U-shaped age distribution was identified regardless of assay or titre threshold applied. Among those less than 20 years old and those 80 years and older, the prevalence of seroprotection was comparably high at about 70%. Seroprotection was 44% among those aged 20-49 and 30% among those 50-79 years. It was lowest among people aged 70-79 years (21%) and highest among those 90 years and older (88%). INTERPRETATION: We measured much higher levels of seroprotection after the 2009 pandemic compared than before the pandemic, with a U-shaped age distribution now evident. These findings, particularly the low levels of seroprotection among people aged 50-79 years, should be confirmed in other settings and closer to the influenza season.
BACKGROUND: Before pandemic (H1N1) 2009, less than 10% of serum samples collected from all age groups in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, showed seroprotection against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, except those from very elderly people. We reassessed this profile of seroprotection by age in the same region six months after the fall 2009 pandemic and vaccination campaign. METHODS: We evaluated 100 anonymized serum samples per 10-year age group based on convenience sampling. We measured levels of antibody against the pandemic virus by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. We assessed geometric mean titres and the proportion of people with seroprotective antibody levels (hemagglutination inhibition titre ≥ 40). We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate titre thresholds of 80, 20 and 10. RESULTS: Serum samples from 1127 people aged 9 months to 101 years were obtained. The overall age-standardized proportion of people with seroprotective antibody levels was 46%. A U-shaped age distribution was identified regardless of assay or titre threshold applied. Among those less than 20 years old and those 80 years and older, the prevalence of seroprotection was comparably high at about 70%. Seroprotection was 44% among those aged 20-49 and 30% among those 50-79 years. It was lowest among people aged 70-79 years (21%) and highest among those 90 years and older (88%). INTERPRETATION: We measured much higher levels of seroprotection after the 2009 pandemic compared than before the pandemic, with a U-shaped age distribution now evident. These findings, particularly the low levels of seroprotection among people aged 50-79 years, should be confirmed in other settings and closer to the influenza season.
Authors: Ashleigh R Tuite; Amy L Greer; Michael Whelan; Anne-Luise Winter; Brenda Lee; Ping Yan; Jianhong Wu; Seyed Moghadas; David Buckeridge; Babak Pourbohloul; David N Fisman Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Gwendolyn L Gilbert; Michelle A Cretikos; Linda Hueston; George Doukas; Brian O'Toole; Dominic E Dwyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth Miller; Katja Hoschler; Pia Hardelid; Elaine Stanford; Nick Andrews; Maria Zambon Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yang Yang; Jonathan D Sugimoto; M Elizabeth Halloran; Nicole E Basta; Dennis L Chao; Laura Matrajt; Gail Potter; Eben Kenah; Ira M Longini Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Liam J Donaldson; Paul D Rutter; Benjamin M Ellis; Felix E C Greaves; Oliver T Mytton; Richard G Pebody; Iain E Yardley Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-12-10
Authors: Daniela Frasca; Alain Diaz; Maria Romero; Mitch Phillips; Nicholas V Mendez; Ana Marie Landin; Bonnie B Blomberg Journal: Int Immunol Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 4.823
Authors: Mary Zacour; Brian J Ward; Angela Brewer; Patrick Tang; Guy Boivin; Yan Li; Michelle Warhuus; Shelly A McNeil; Jason J LeBlanc; Todd F Hatchette Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2016-01-27
Authors: Anna J X Zhang; Kelvin K W To; Herman Tse; Kwok-Hung Chan; Kun-Yuan Guo; Can Li; Ivan F N Hung; Jasper F W Chan; Honglin Chen; Sidney Tam; Kwok-Yung Yuen Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2011-09-07
Authors: Deena R Blumenkrantz; Thomas Mehoke; Kathryn Shaw-Saliba; Harrison Powell; Nicholas Wohlgemuth; Hsuan Liu; Elizabeth Macias; Jared Evans; Mitra Lewis; Rebecca Medina; Justin Hardick; Lauren M Sauer; Andrea Dugas; Anna DuVal; Andrew P Lane; Charlotte Gaydos; Richard Rothman; Peter Thielen; Andrew Pekosz Journal: Virus Evol Date: 2021-06-04