Literature DB >> 20921109

Body part representations in verbal semantics.

Benjamin Bergen1, Ting-Ting Chan Lau, Shweta Narayan, Diana Stojanovic, Kathryn Wheeler.   

Abstract

Embodied theories of language propose that word meaning is inextricably tied to-grounded in-mental representations of perceptual, motor, and affective experiences of the world. The four experiments described in this article demonstrate that accessing the meanings of action verbs like smile, punch, and kick requires language understanders to activate modality-specific cognitive representations responsible for performing and perceiving those same actions. The main task used is a word-image matching task, where participants see an action verb and an image depicting an action. Their task is to decide as quickly as possible whether the verb and the image depict the same action. Of critical interest is participants' behavior when the verb and image do not match, in which case the two actions can use the same effector or different effectors. In Experiment 1, we found that participants took significantly longer to reject a verb-image pair when the actions depicted by the image and denoted by the verb used the same effector than when they used different effectors. Experiment 2 yielded the same result when the order of presentation was reversed, replicating the effect in Cantonese. Experiment 3 replicated the effect in English with a verb-verb near-synonym task, and in Experiment 4, we once again replicated the effect with learners of English as a second language. This robust interference effect, whereby a shared effector slows discrimination, shows that language understanders activate effector-specific neurocognitive representations during both picture perception and action word understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921109     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

1.  Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.

Authors:  L Nyberg; K M Petersson; L G Nilsson; J Sandblom; C Aberg; M Ingvar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex.

Authors:  M E Wheeler; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese; George Lakoff
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Perception of motion affects language processing.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Carol J Madden; David J Therriault; Richard H Yaxley; Mark Aveyard; Adrienne A Blanchard; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01

5.  Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Tettamanti; Giovanni Buccino; Maria Cristina Saccuman; Vittorio Gallese; Massimo Danna; Paola Scifo; Ferruccio Fazio; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study.

Authors:  G Buccino; L Riggio; G Melli; F Binkofski; V Gallese; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-12

7.  Head up, foot down: object words orient attention to the objects' typical location.

Authors:  Zachary Estes; Michelle Verges; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

8.  The Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing.

Authors:  Kristin L Borreggine; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-12

9.  The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J R Duhamel; L Cohen; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  On the role of recurrent inhibitory feedback in motor control.

Authors:  U Windhorst
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.685

View more
  7 in total

1.  Attention to body-parts varies with visual preference and verb-effector associations.

Authors:  Ty W Boyer; Josita Maouene; Nitya Sethuraman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-02-09

2.  Perceptual Representations in L1, L2 and L3 Comprehension: Delayed Sentence-Picture Verification.

Authors:  Donggui Chen; Ruiming Wang; Jinqiao Zhang; Cong Liu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-02

3.  How words ripple through bilingual hands: Motor-language coupling during L1 and L2 writing.

Authors:  Boris Kogan; Enrique García-Marco; Agustina Birba; Camila Cortés; Margherita Melloni; Agustín Ibáñez; Adolfo M García
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Virtual action and real action have different impacts on comprehension of concrete verbs.

Authors:  Claudia Repetto; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-24

5.  Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Lauren B Curley; Luke E Miller; Ayse P Saygin; Benjamin K Bergen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  How Language Is Embodied in Bilinguals and Children with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Ashley M Adams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-17

7.  Motor-system dynamics during naturalistic reading of action narratives in first and second language.

Authors:  Agustina Birba; David Beltrán; Miguel Martorell Caro; Piergiorgio Trevisan; Boris Kogan; Lucas Sedeño; Agustín Ibáñez; Adolfo M García
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.