Literature DB >> 16238481

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics.

Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven1, Ewout W Steyerberg, J Dik F Habbema, Elana Farace, Anthony Marmarou, Gordon D Murray, Lawrence F Marshall, Andrew I R Maas.   

Abstract

The early prediction of outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important for several purposes, but no prognostic models have yet been developed with proven generalizability across different settings. The objective of this study was to develop and validate prognostic models that use information available at admission to estimate 6-month outcome after severe or moderate TBI. To this end, this study evaluated mortality and unfavorable outcome, that is, death, and vegetative or severe disability on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), at 6 months post-injury. Prospectively collected data on 2269 patients from two multi-center clinical trials were used to develop prognostic models for each outcome with logistic regression analysis. We included seven predictive characteristics-age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, computed tomography classification, and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The models were validated internally with bootstrapping techniques. External validity was determined in prospectively collected data from two relatively unselected surveys in Europe (n = 796) and in North America (n = 746). We evaluated the discriminative ability, that is, the ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Further, we determined calibration, that is, agreement between predicted and observed outcome, with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The models discriminated well in the development population (AUC 0.78-0.80). External validity was even better (AUC 0.83-0.89). Calibration was less satisfactory, with poor external validity in the North American survey (p < 0.001). Especially, observed risks were higher than predicted for poor prognosis patients. A score chart was derived from the regression models to facilitate clinical application. Relatively simple prognostic models using baseline characteristics can accurately predict 6-month outcome in patients with severe or moderate TBI. The high discriminative ability indicates the potential of this model for classifying patients according to prognostic risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16238481     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  71 in total

1.  Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Shelly R Cooper; Adam R Ferguson; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Initial predictive factors of outcome in severe non-accidental head trauma in children.

Authors:  Didier Scavarda; Charline Gabaudan; Fabrice Ughetto; Frederic Lamy; Vanessa Imada; Gabriel Lena; Olivier Paut
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  A clinical decision rule to predict adult patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage who do not require intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Kiarash Shahlaie; Angela Echeverri; James F Holmes
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Aggressive red blood cell transfusion: no association with improved outcomes for victims of isolated traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Mark E George; David E Skarda; Charles R Watts; Hoai D Pham; Greg J Beilman
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  A Configurational Analysis of Risk Patterns for Predicting the Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Niku Gorji; Zsolt Zador; Simon Poon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Hyunjo Lee; Moshe A Mizrahi; Jed A Hartings; Sameer Sharma; Laura Pahren; Laura B Ngwenya; Brian D Moseley; Michael Privitera; Frank C Tortella; Brandon Foreman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  'Spreading depression of Leão' and its emerging relevance to acute brain injury in humans.

Authors:  Martin Lauritzen; Anthony J Strong
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Laurie J Morrison; Sean M Devlin; Eileen M Bulger; Karen J Brasel; Kellie Sheehan; Joseph P Minei; Jeffrey D Kerby; Samuel A Tisherman; Sandro Rizoli; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Rardi van Heest; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Traumatic brain injury: simple data collection will improve the outcome.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prognostic study.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Ian Roberts; Omar Bouamra; Maralyn Woodford; Jane Mooney; Fiona Lecky
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.