Literature DB >> 18265832

Assessing the automaticity of the exogenous orienting of tactile attention.

Valerio Santangelo1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

We examined whether or not abrupt tactile onsets are capable of exogenously capturing tactile spatial attention when visual spatial attention is focused elsewhere. In experiment 1, we compared performance under dual-task conditions (where participants performed a tactile exogenous cuing task and a rapid serial visual presentation--RSVP--task at the same time) with their performance under single-task conditions (where the participants had to perform only the cuing task, although the RSVP stream was still presented in the background) and to a no-stream condition (where only the cuing task was presented). Tactile cuing was completely suppressed in both the dual-task and single-task conditions, showing that exogenous tactile spatial orienting is modulated by visual-spatial attention, which hence appears to be far from truly automatic. In experiment 2, we demonstrated that the abolishment of exogenous tactile orienting was not caused by the transient presentation of abrupt onset stimuli (letters). These results therefore show that exogenous spatial attentional orienting toward abrupt peripheral tactile stimuli is possible as long as perceptual resources are not depleted by a perceptually demanding (RSVP) task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265832     DOI: 10.1068/p5848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Authors:  Chanon M Jones; Rob Gray; Charles Spence; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Paola Finoia; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Alyanne M De Haan; Juan Lupiañez; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-11

5.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Digital haptics improve speed of visual search performance in a dual-task setting.

Authors:  Ruxandra I Tivadar; Rebecca C Arnold; Nora Turoman; Jean-François Knebel; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Multisensory warning signals: when spatial correspondence matters.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Valerio Santangelo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatial orientation of attention and obstacle avoidance following concussion.

Authors:  Robert D Catena; Paul van Donkelaar; Charlene I Halterman; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Jess Hartcher-O'Brien; Alberto Gallace; Benedikt Krings; Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Out of touch? Visual load induces inattentional numbness.

Authors:  Sandra Murphy; Polly Dalton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.