Literature DB >> 18265605

Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.

Douglas L Nelson1, Leilani B Goodmon, Umit Akirmak.   

Abstract

Words having more densely entangled associative structures are more likely to be recalled in the presence of related extralist cues. A context-modified PIER2 model predicts that the implicit activation of such structures during study connects them to the context of the learning episode. In two experiments, we evaluated this assumption by varying the associative density of the study words and the accessibility of context information. In Experiment 1, we varied context accessibility by manipulating context awareness and by delaying testing and filling the delay with different types of interfering tasks. In Experiment 2, we varied accessibility by manipulating test delay and type of interference in a factorial design. The effects of associative density were reduced by using implicit testing that never refers to context, by performing interpolated interference tasks, and finally, by extending the length of the delay. Information that is implicitly activated during an episodic experience is associated to the context of that experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265605     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.

Authors:  D L Nelson; N Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

Authors:  L J Schooler; R M Shiffrin; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  What is this thing called frequency?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

Review 4.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference.

Authors:  C Lustig; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Mark Steyvers; Joseph D Stephens; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

6.  Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance?

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Cathy L McEvoy; Lisa Pointer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

8.  Strengthening the activation of unconsciously activated memories.

Authors:  Leilani B Goodmon; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

9.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.

Authors:  D L Nelson; V M McKinney; N R Gee; G A Janczura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; N R Gee; T A Schreiber; V M McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Kirsty Kitto; David Galea; Cathy L McEvoy; Peter D Bruza
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.