Literature DB >> 18265415

Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery.

C Y Nguan1, R Morady, C Wang, D Harrison, D Browning, R Rayman, P P W Luke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In North America, the urological community has embraced surgical robotic technology in the performance of complex laparoscopic surgery. The performance of complex long-distance telesurgery requires further investigation prior to clinical application.
METHODS: The feasibility of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a porcine model was assessed using the Zeus robot and the internet protocol virtual private network (IP-VPNe) and satellite links. Eighteen pyeloplasty procedures were performed, using real-time, IP-VPNe and satellite network connection (six of each). Network and objective operative data were collected.
RESULTS: Despite network delays and jitter, it was feasible to perform the pyeloplasty procedure without significant detriment in operative time or surgical results compared with real-time surgery.
CONCLUSION: The completion of complex tasks such as robotic pyeloplasty is feasible using both land-line and satellite telesurgery. However, the clinical relevance of telesurgery requires further assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18265415     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  11 in total

Review 1.  Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery.

Authors:  Ben Challacombe; Sarah Wheatstone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Impact of delay on telesurgical performance: study on the robotic simulator dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Song Xu; Sanket Chauhan; Alyssa Tanaka; Khara Simpson; Haidar Abdul-Muhsin; Roger Smith
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  International survey study of attitudes towards robotic surgery.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Ivana Kolic; Alan P Karthikesalingam; Oliver Wagner; Monika E Hagen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-08-06

Review 4.  Telemedicine in Surgery: What are the Opportunities and Hurdles to Realising the Potential?

Authors:  Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer(®) simulator.

Authors:  Song Xu; Manuela Perez; Kun Yang; Cyril Perrenot; Jacques Felblinger; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Improving access to urologists through an electronic consultation service.

Authors:  Luke Witherspoon; Clare Liddy; Amir Afkham; Erin Keely; John Mahoney
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

7. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Virtual Interactive Presence in Global Surgical Education: International Collaboration Through Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Matthew Christopher Davis; Dang D Can; Jonathan Pindrik; Brandon G Rocque; James M Johnston
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 9.  Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Cerbo; Julio Cesar Morales-Medina; Beniamino Palmieri; Tommaso Iannitti
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  5G Use in Healthcare: The Future is Present.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Georgiou; Evangelos Georgiou; Richard M Satava
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.