Literature DB >> 20425633

Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery.

Ben Challacombe1, Sarah Wheatstone.   

Abstract

For more than 150 years, doctors have had the ability to transmit medical information to advise and assist their colleagues in remote locations via teleconsultation using a variety of communication modalities. In surgery this has evolved into the telementoring of minimally invasive procedures, particularly, robotic surgery, which have become relatively commonplace in urology. The ultimate progression to true telerobotic surgery, in which remote surgeons independently perform complex and fundamental parts of procedures at long range, is starting to occur. This article discusses the current state of telementoring and telerobotics in urology and examines the pros and cons of this technology at the present time.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425633     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-009-0086-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  32 in total

1.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery.

Authors:  J Marescaux; J Leroy; M Gagner; F Rubino; D Mutter; M Vix; S E Butner; M K Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases.

Authors:  S Micali; G Virgili; E Vannozzi; N Grassi; T W Jarrett; J J Bauer; G Vespasiani; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Trans-oceanic telerobotic surgery.

Authors:  B J Challacombe; L R Kavoussi; P Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The RoboConsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface.

Authors:  Rahul Agarwal; Adam W Levinson; Mohamad Allaf; Danil Makarov; Alex Nason; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery.

Authors:  C Y Nguan; R Morady; C Wang; D Harrison; D Browning; R Rayman; P P W Luke
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Pre-clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype.

Authors:  Christopher Nguan; Brian Miller; Rajni Patel; Patrick P W Luke; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Telesurgery: an ethical appraisal.

Authors:  A van Wynsberghe; C Gastmans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Telementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot.

Authors:  S Sereno; D Mutter; B Dallemagne; C D Smith; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Virtual reality and telepresence for military medicine.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Execution of robot-assisted biopsies within the clinical context.

Authors:  A Rovetta; R Sala
Journal:  J Image Guid Surg       Date:  1995
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolf Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the Google Glass experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Roy Phitayakorn; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Ozanan Meireles
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The use of telemedicine in Italian Blood Banks: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Pierluigi Berti; Franco Verlicchi; Francesco Fiorin; Roberto Guaschino; Adelio Cangemi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guixiang Liao; Zhihong Zhao; Shuhui Lin; Rong Li; Yawei Yuan; Shasha Du; Jiarong Chen; Haijun Deng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.

Authors:  Giuseppe Palomba; Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi; Marianna Capuano; Pietro Anoldo; Marco Milone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Giovanni Aprea
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-11-07

6.  Novel training methods for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Sun; Monish Aron; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07

7.  The Potential for Undue Patient Exposure during the Use of Telementoring Technology.

Authors:  David P Darrow; Anthony Spano; Andrew Grande
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 8.  Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Authors:  Layne N Raborn; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.