Literature DB >> 27638277

International survey study of attitudes towards robotic surgery.

Sheraz R Markar1, Ivana Kolic2, Alan P Karthikesalingam3, Oliver Wagner4, Monika E Hagen4.   

Abstract

The field of robotic surgery is rapidly advancing both in terms of the surgical procedures performed and the potential applications of this technology. This survey study attempts to evaluate the opinions of the public regarding a number of issues in robotic surgery. A web-based survey study was constructed using the web-based software "Kwiksurveys". This survey was then advertised and distributed over the Internet to gain responders from a wide range of socio-economic groups and in a number of countries. Responses were collected over a six-month period. One-hundred and fifty-five participants took part in this survey study. The mean age of participants was 35.5 ± 3.4 years. The majority of participants (52%) were either comfortable or totally comfortable with the current version of robotic surgery during which a surgeon in the same room controls instruments inside the patient. Sixty-eight percent of responders reported they would be very uncomfortable with the idea of not seeing the operating surgeon in person before or after surgery. Forty-five percent of participants reported they would consider the idea of an internal robot operating internally with little or no external scarring. This survey study has demonstrated that currently the public seem to be comfortable with the current version of robotic surgery, with the operating surgeon in the same room as the patient. The results of this survey study show that even with technical advances in robotic surgery, patients will still want to have contact with their operating surgeon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotics; Survey

Year:  2011        PMID: 27638277     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0301-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

1.  Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Binder; W Kramer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P-C Lee; C Lo; P-S Lai; J-J Chang; S-J Huang; M-T Lin; P-H Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A P Karthikesalingam; M E Hagen; M Talamini; S Horgan; O J Wagner
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments.

Authors:  R Rayman; K Croome; N Galbraith; R McClure; R Morady; S Peterson; S Smith; V Subotic; A Van Wynsberghe; S Primak
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery.

Authors:  C Y Nguan; R Morady; C Wang; D Harrison; D Browning; R Rayman; P P W Luke
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay--pilot study.

Authors:  Mitchell J H Lum; Jacob Rosen; Thomas S Lendvay; Andrew S Wright; Mika N Sinanan; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2008

7.  Telesurgery: an ethical appraisal.

Authors:  A van Wynsberghe; C Gastmans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Spirituality within the patient-surgeon relationship.

Authors:  Dan Taylor; Madhuri S Mulekar; Arnold Luterman; Frederick N Meyer; William O Richards; Charles B Rodning
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Eric Volckmann; Eric Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach.

Authors:  M E Hagen; O J Wagner; D Christen; P Morel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.093

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Awareness, perception, knowledge, and attitude toward robotic surgery in a general surgical outpatient clinic in Singapore, Asia.

Authors:  Kai Siang Chan; Jia Rui Kwan; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 2.  Roboethics principles and policies in Europe and North America.

Authors:  Sofya Langman; Nicole Capicotto; Yaser Maddahi; Kourosh Zareinia
Journal:  SN Appl Sci       Date:  2021-11-07

3.  Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Christopher J Payne; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Robotic Anxiety-Parents' Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ammer; Laura Sophie Mandt; Isabelle Christine Silbersdorff; Fritz Kahl; York Hagmayer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.