Literature DB >> 18264854

CT scan method accurately assesses humeral head retroversion.

P Boileau1, R T Bicknell, N Mazzoleni, G Walch, J P Urien.   

Abstract

Humeral head retroversion is not well described with the literature controversial regarding accuracy of measurement methods and ranges of normal values. We therefore determined normal humeral head retroversion and assessed the measurement methods. We measured retroversion in 65 cadaveric humeri, including 52 paired specimens, using four methods: radiographic, computed tomography (CT) scan, computer-assisted, and direct methods. We also assessed the distance between the humeral head central axis and the bicipital groove. CT scan methods accurately measure humeral head retroversion, while radiographic methods do not. The retroversion with respect to the transepicondylar axis was 17.9 degrees and 21.5 degrees with respect to the trochlear tangent axis. The difference between the right and left humeri was 8.9 degrees. The distance between the central axis of the humeral head and the bicipital groove was 7.0 mm and was consistent between right and left humeri. Humeral head retroversion may be most accurately obtained using the patient's own anatomic landmarks or, if not, identifiable retroversion as measured by those landmarks on contralateral side or the bicipital groove.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264854      PMCID: PMC2505224          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0089-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  50 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J Yuan; L U Bigliani; E L Flatow; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  [Imaging of the shoulder in orthopedic pathology].

Authors:  J Bernageau
Journal:  Rev Prat       Date:  1990-04-11

3.  Radiologic assessment of humeral head retroversion. Description of a new method.

Authors:  V Söderlund; M Kronberg; L A Broström
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Unconstrained total shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  R H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Kinematics of the elbow.

Authors:  J T London
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Ultrasonographic measurement of humeral torsion.

Authors:  N Ito; M Eto; K Maeda; M E Rabbi; K Iwasaki
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure.

Authors:  C A Compito; E B Self; L U Bigliani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Modular total shoulder replacement. Design rationale, indications, and results.

Authors:  J M Fenlin; M L Ramsey; T J Allardyce; B G Frieman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus.

Authors:  Jennifer A DeLude; Ryan T Bicknell; Geoff A MacKenzie; Louis M Ferreira; Cynthia E Dunning; Graham J W King; James A Johnson; Darren S Drosdowech
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Analysis of the bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral head replacement.

Authors:  John Itamura; Todd Dietrick; Nick Roidis; Chris Shean; Frank Chen; James Tibone
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  18 in total

1.  Soft tissue balancing in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maike Mueller; Gregory Hoy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

2.  Assessment of the restriction of arm elevation after intramedullary fixation for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Correlation between the retroversion of the humeral head and the orientation of the intertubercular sulcus: a CT scan anatomical study.

Authors:  Daphne Guenoun; Thomas Le Corroller; Aude Lagier; Vanessa Pauly; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  [Torsional malalignment of the humerus].

Authors:  N Hawi; S Razaeian; C Krettek; R Meller; E Liodakis
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Validity of measuring humeral torsion using palpation of bicipital tuberosities.

Authors:  Amitabh Dashottar; John D Borstad
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Position of shoulder arthroplasty and clinical outcome in proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Roberto Padua; L Padua; M Galluzzo; E Ceccarelli; F Alviti; A Castagna
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-07

7.  Three-dimensional humeral morphologic alterations and atrophy associated with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Sylvain Brochard; Abrahm J Behnam; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  A 3D comparison of humeral head retroversion by sex and measurement technique.

Authors:  Emily A West; Nikolas K Knowles; George S Athwal; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-06-06

9.  ASSESSMENT OF HUMERAL TORSION BY PALPATION IN BASEBALL PITCHERS: A VALIDATION STUDY.

Authors:  Lee S Yaari; Michael J Mullaney; Takumi Fukunaga; Ran Thein; Malachy P McHugh; Stephen J Nicholas
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

Review 10.  Is Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis Better Than Conventional Open Plating for Humeral Shaft Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Kumar Keshav; Anurag Baghel; Vishal Kumar; Deepak Neradi; Kumar Kaustubh; Prabhaker Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.