Literature DB >> 22489871

Validity of measuring humeral torsion using palpation of bicipital tuberosities.

Amitabh Dashottar1, John D Borstad.   

Abstract

The magnitude of humeral torsion (HT) affects the internal and external rotation range of motion at the shoulder. Currently imaging is required to quantify the HT angle, however, factors such as cost and non-availability of imaging to musculoskeletal clinicians limits its use. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of palpation of the bicipital tuberosities as an alternative to imaging for quantifying HT angles. The bicipital-forearm angle, an indirect measure of HT, was measured using palpation and real-time ultrasound imaging in 25 subjects. The agreement among the two methods was excellent with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (3,k)  =  0.92, and the mean difference between the two methods was -0.2° (SD 4.1°) with 95% limits of agreement of -8.3° to 7.9°. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) among the two methods was 0.85. In a clinical setting, palpation appears to be a practical alternative to US imaging for measuring HT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22489871      PMCID: PMC3539156          DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2012.675416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  27 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J Yuan; L U Bigliani; E L Flatow; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Craig D Morgan; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Shoulder range of motion measures as risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball and baseball players.

Authors:  Ellen Shanley; Mitchell J Rauh; Lori A Michener; Todd S Ellenbecker; J Craig Garrison; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in the asymptomatic professional pitcher and its relationship to humeral retroversion.

Authors:  John M Tokish; Michael S Curtin; Young-Kyu Kim; Richard J Hawkins; Michael R Torry
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Humeral retroversion and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation in the shoulder of college baseball players.

Authors:  K M Reagan; Keith Meister; Mary Beth Horodyski; Dave W Werner; Cathy Carruthers; Kevin Wilk
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Correction of posterior shoulder tightness is associated with symptom resolution in patients with internal impingement.

Authors:  Timothy F Tyler; Stephen J Nicholas; Steven J Lee; Michael Mullaney; Malachy P McHugh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Ultrasonographic measurement of humeral torsion.

Authors:  N Ito; M Eto; K Maeda; M E Rabbi; K Iwasaki
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Influence of humeral torsion on interpretation of posterior shoulder tightness measures in overhead athletes.

Authors:  Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Benjamin M Goerger; Terri Jo Rucinski; J Troy Blackburn; R Alexander Creighton
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer.

Authors:  Andrea F de Winter; Monique A M B Heemskerk; Caroline B Terwee; Marielle P Jans; Walter Devillé; Dirk-Jan van Schaardenburg; Rob J P M Scholten; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Range of shoulder motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis; intra-tester reproducibility is acceptable for group comparisons.

Authors:  Einar Kristian Tveitå; Ole Marius Ekeberg; Niels Gunnar Juel; Erik Bautz-Holter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reliability of and the relationship between ultrasound measurement and three clinical assessments of humeral torsion.

Authors:  Rebecca Feuerherd; Mark A Sutherlin; Joseph M Hart; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

2.  ASSESSMENT OF HUMERAL TORSION BY PALPATION IN BASEBALL PITCHERS: A VALIDATION STUDY.

Authors:  Lee S Yaari; Michael J Mullaney; Takumi Fukunaga; Ran Thein; Malachy P McHugh; Stephen J Nicholas
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

3.  Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Jared L Zitnay; Klevis Aliaj; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.746

4.  Relationship of clinical measures with humeral torsion in young adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  David M Werner; Eric V Bellm; Joseph M Day
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-05-24

5.  The Reliability and Validity of a Clinical Measurement Proposed to Quantify Humeral Torsion.

Authors:  Paul A Salamh; William J Hanney; Lauren Champion; Connor Hansen; Kari Cochenour; Celine Siahmakoun; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-02

6.  Measurement Methods for Humeral Retroversion Using Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans: Which Is Most Concordant with the Standard Method?

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Woo Kim; Angel A Cayetano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.