Literature DB >> 12195248

Analysis of the bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral head replacement.

John Itamura1, Todd Dietrick, Nick Roidis, Chris Shean, Frank Chen, James Tibone.   

Abstract

Many anthropometric studies of the normal glenohumeral relationship have been performed in an effort to identify reference points for the correct placement of the humeral head prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty. The bicipital groove offers a useful landmark for placement of the lateral fin of the prosthesis. However, when fracture surgery is performed, only the distal portion of the bicipital groove may be available for reference. We evaluated the course of the bicipital groove as it moves distally along the humerus. Computer-assisted tomography axial images of 21 cadaveric humeri were obtained in order to follow the course of the bicipital groove from proximal to distal on the humerus. With use of the bisector of the transepicondylar axis as a reference point, the relative change in position of the bicipital groove from proximal to distal was measured. The mean change in rotation of the lateral lip from the proximal to the distal groove was 15.9 degrees, with an SD of 6.8 degrees (range, 4 degrees -32 degrees ). The 95% confidence interval range for the change was 12.8 degrees to 19 degrees. Thus, a significant amount of internal rotation occurs along the course of the bicipital groove. This has significant clinical implications when the bicipital groove is used as a landmark for humeral head replacement in fractures of the proximal humerus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195248     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.124345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  3D bicipital groove shape analysis and relationship to tendopathy.

Authors:  Aaron D Ward; Ghassan Hamarneh; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  CT scan method accurately assesses humeral head retroversion.

Authors:  P Boileau; R T Bicknell; N Mazzoleni; G Walch; J P Urien
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Lesser tuberosity is more reliable than bicipital groove when determining orientation of humeral head in primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rastislav Hromádka; Ales Antonín Kubena; David Pokorný; Stanislav Popelka; David Jahoda; Antonín Sosna
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Proximal humeral fractures: an understanding of the ideal plate positioning.

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Rodrigo Pires e Albuquerque; Vinícius Schott; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Willian Dias Belangero; José Sérgio Franco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Medial reconstruction technique in the treatment of complex fractures of humeral proximal epiphysis with SMR prosthetic modular system.

Authors:  Raffele Russo; Luigi Vernaglia Lombardi; Fabio Cautiero; Gerardo Giudice; Michele Ciccarelli
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-03

6.  Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Jared L Zitnay; Klevis Aliaj; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.746

7.  The glenohumeral joint - a mismatching system? A morphological analysis of the cartilaginous and osseous curvature of the humeral head and the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Marko Kraljević; Sebastian Hoechel; Annemarie Conzen; Andrej Maria Nowakowski; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Review of bicipital groove morphology and its analysis in north Indian population.

Authors:  Singh Rajani; Singh Man
Journal:  ISRN Anat       Date:  2013-09-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.