Literature DB >> 15180229

Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology.

Inger Mechlenburg1, Jens R Nyengaard, Lone Rømer, Kjeld Søballe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We used a stereologic method based on 3D CT scanning to estimate the projected load-bearing surface in the hip joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 6 normal hip joints and 6 dysplastic hips were examined. The latter were CT-scanned before and after periacetabular osteotomy.
RESULTS: We found that the average area of the projected load-bearing surface of the femoral head preoperatively was 7.4 (6.5-8.4) cm2 and postoperatively 11 (9.8-14) cm2, which was similar to the load-bearing surface in the normal control group. We performed double measurements and the coefficient of error of the mean was estimated at 1.6%. Due to overprojection, an overestimation of about 3.8% on the projected load-bearing surface occurred. Consequently, the stereologic method proved to be precise and unbiased.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that this method is of value for monitoring the load-bearing area in the hip joint of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15180229     DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  22 in total

1.  The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of adult hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Prospective bone density changes after periacetabular osteotomy: a methodological study.

Authors:  I Mechlenburg; J R Nyengaard; L Rømer; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reliable angle assessment during periacetabular osteotomy with a novel device.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Brian Elmengaard; Lone Rømer; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Stephanie Y Pun; Andreas Hingsammer; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Robert S Armiger; Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepisto; Davneet Minhas; Kaj Tallroth; Simon C Mears; Matthew D Waites; Russell H Taylor
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2007-07

6.  Pelvic positioning creates error in CT acetabular measurements.

Authors:  Harold J P van Bosse; Duron Lee; Eric R Henderson; Debra A Sala; David S Feldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cartilage thickness in the hip measured by MRI and stereology before and after periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Jens R Nyengaard; John Gelineck; Kjeld Soballe; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  How are dysplastic hips different? A three-dimensional CT study.

Authors:  Harold van Bosse; John H Wedge; Paul Babyn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Muscle-tendon-related abnormalities detected by ultrasonography are common in symptomatic hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Julie Sandell Jacobsen; Lars Bolvig; Per Hölmich; Kristian Thorborg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Søballe; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.