Literature DB >> 21057788

The use of fibre-based demineralised bone matrix in major acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique and preliminary results.

Moussa Hamadouche1, Mathieu Karoubi, Valérie Dumaine, Jean Pierre Courpied.   

Abstract

Acetabular osteolysis associated with socket loosening is one of the main long-term complications of total hip arthroplasty. In case of major bone loss, where <50% host bone coverage can be obtained with a porous-coated cementless cup, it is generally agreed that a metal ring or cage in association with a cemented component and allograft bone should be used. In order to promote allograft bone consolidation and incorporation, we have associated demineralised bone matrix (DBM, Grafton® A Flex) to the construct ion. Here we describe the technical details of major acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with allograft bone and DBM. This device has a hook that must be placed under the teardrop of the acetabulum and a plate for iliac fixation. The main advantages of this device are help in restoring the normal centre of hip rotation, guiding the reconstruction and partially unloading the graft. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device has provided a 92% survival rate free of loosening at 13-year follow-up in a consecutive series of 60 type III and IV deficiencies. Our preliminary results using DBM indicate faster allograft consolidation and remodelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21057788      PMCID: PMC3032110          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1145-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; L D Dorr; Y Y Won; D Longjohn; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases.

Authors:  Bernardo Vargas; Jacques Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years.

Authors:  Fernando Comba; Martín Buttaro; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Noriaki Miyata; Hiroshi Enomoto; Makoto Osaki; Hiroyuki Shindo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions.

Authors:  M Kerboull; M Hamadouche; L Kerboull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Chiaki Tanaka; Jitsuhiko Shikata; Minoru Ikenaga; Makoto Takahashi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion.

Authors:  John Louis-Ugbo; Hideki Murakami; Hak-Sun Kim; Akihito Minamide; Scott D Boden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient.

Authors:  Frank P Cammisa; Gary Lowery; Steven R Garfin; Fred H Geisler; Peter M Klara; Robert A McGuire; Walter R Sassard; Harrison Stubbs; Jon E Block
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kawai; Chiaki Tanaka; Minoru Ikenaga; Hiroshi Kanoe; Shuzo Okudaira
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Katsuo Shitoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  Total Hip Arthroplasty, state of the art for the 21st century.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Courpied; Jacques Henri Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Retention of a well-fixed acetabular component in the setting of acetabular osteolysis.

Authors:  Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular reconstruction using a free fibular autograft in total hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Chiaki Tanaka; Francois Lintz; Sylvie Collon; Kevin Bargoin; Francois Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  J van der Stok; K A Hartholt; D A L Schoenmakers; J J C Arts
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 5.  Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Pierannunzii; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

6.  Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements.

Authors:  Jacek B Kowalczewski; Lidia Rutkowska-Sak; Dariusz Marczak; Iwona Słowińska; Radosław Słowiński; Marcin Sibiński
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.