AIMS: To study the relative prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) monitoring in addition to clinical disease severity scores (CDSSs) in outpatients with destabilized heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-one outpatients with recently destabilized HF were recruited. At baseline, and at all following visits, a CDSS based on Framingham criteria was obtained, and NT-proBNP levels were measured in a blind fashion. CDSS did not correlate with NT-proBNP levels at any time (P > 0.1), although their relative changes correlated during follow-up (P < 0.001). Forty patients (56%) had clinical events (cardiovascular death and/or HF hospitalization) within 1 year of follow-up. Changes in CDSS from baseline were not predictive of subsequent events (P > 0.1 for all visits), whereas changes in NT-proBNP levels were predictive at several time points: week 2 (P = 0.005), week 3 (P = 0.037), week 4 (P = 0.015), and 6 months (P = 0.026). A change in NT-proBNP levels at follow-up week 2 (%) added independent prognostic information (P < 0.001, HR 0.982, 95% CI 0.972-0.992) to baseline CDSS (P = 0.002, HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.290-3.266), age (P = 0.007, HR 1.034, 95% CI 1.009-1.059), and left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.013, HR 0.942, 95% CI 0.898-0.987). CONCLUSION: Serial monitoring for per cent change in NT-proBNP concentrations offers superior prognostic information to clinical assessment among outpatients with recent destabilized HF.
AIMS: To study the relative prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) monitoring in addition to clinical disease severity scores (CDSSs) in outpatients with destabilized heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-one outpatients with recently destabilized HF were recruited. At baseline, and at all following visits, a CDSS based on Framingham criteria was obtained, and NT-proBNP levels were measured in a blind fashion. CDSS did not correlate with NT-proBNP levels at any time (P > 0.1), although their relative changes correlated during follow-up (P < 0.001). Forty patients (56%) had clinical events (cardiovascular death and/or HF hospitalization) within 1 year of follow-up. Changes in CDSS from baseline were not predictive of subsequent events (P > 0.1 for all visits), whereas changes in NT-proBNP levels were predictive at several time points: week 2 (P = 0.005), week 3 (P = 0.037), week 4 (P = 0.015), and 6 months (P = 0.026). A change in NT-proBNP levels at follow-up week 2 (%) added independent prognostic information (P < 0.001, HR 0.982, 95% CI 0.972-0.992) to baseline CDSS (P = 0.002, HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.290-3.266), age (P = 0.007, HR 1.034, 95% CI 1.009-1.059), and left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.013, HR 0.942, 95% CI 0.898-0.987). CONCLUSION: Serial monitoring for per cent change in NT-proBNP concentrations offers superior prognostic information to clinical assessment among outpatients with recent destabilized HF.
Authors: Kirkwood F Adams; G Michael Felker; Ghassan Fraij; J Herbert Patterson; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: David E Lanfear; Sheryl Chow; Badri Padhukasahasram; Jia Li; David Langholz; W H Wilson Tang; L Keoki Williams; Hani N Sabbah Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Julie McLellan; Carl J Heneghan; Rafael Perera; Alison M Clements; Paul P Glasziou; Karen E Kearley; Nicola Pidduck; Nia W Roberts; Sally Tyndel; F Lucy Wright; Clare Bankhead Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-12-22
Authors: David E Lanfear; Joseph J Gibbs; Jia Li; Ruicong She; Christopher Petucci; Jeffrey A Culver; W H Wilson Tang; Yigal M Pinto; L Keoki Williams; Hani N Sabbah; Stephen J Gardell Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 12.035