| Literature DB >> 24986335 |
Mark Oremus1, Andrew Don-Wauchope, Robert McKelvie, Pasqualina L Santaguida, Stephen Hill, Cynthia Balion, Ronald Booth, Judy A Brown, Usman Ali, Amy Bustamam, Nazmul Sohel, Parminder Raina.
Abstract
Prognosis permits clinicians to separate persons with heart failure (HF) into subgroups based on likely health outcomes. Treatment is partly guided by these likely outcomes. This systematic review explores whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are independent predictors of prognosis in persons with chronic stable HF. We electronically searched Medline, Embase, AMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL for English-language articles published between 1989 and mid-2012. We utilized trained reviewers and standardized forms to screen articles for inclusion and extracted data from included articles. All included studies were summarized in narrative and tabular form. We used the Hayden criteria to assess the risk of bias. Sixteen BNP publications and 88 NT-proBNP publications were included in the systematic review. BNP was positively associated with all-cause and HF mortality. NT-proBNP was positively associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. BNP and NT-proBNP levels are useful for estimating prognosis in persons with chronic stable HF. Further research is required to establish optimal cutpoints and to assess whether prognostic effects differ by age, sex, or time period.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2014 PMID： 24986335 DOI： 10.1007/s10741-014-9439-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Fail Rev ISSN： 1382-4147 Impact factor: 4.214