Literature DB >> 18263572

Complete genome sequence of Finegoldia magna, an anaerobic opportunistic pathogen.

Takatsugu Goto1, Atsushi Yamashita, Hideki Hirakawa, Minenosuke Matsutani, Kozo Todo, Kenshiro Ohshima, Hidehiro Toh, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Satoru Kuhara, Masahira Hattori, Tohru Shimizu, Shigeru Akimoto.   

Abstract

Finegoldia magna (formerly Peptostreptococcus magnus), a member of the Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC), is a commensal bacterium colonizing human skin and mucous membranes. Moreover, it is also recognized as an opportunistic pathogen responsible for various infectious diseases. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of F. magna ATCC 29328. The genome consists of a 1,797,577 bp circular chromosome and an 189,163 bp plasmid (pPEP1). The metabolic maps constructed based on the genome information confirmed that most F. magna strains cannot ferment most sugars, except fructose, and have various aminopeptidase activities. Three homologs of albumin-binding protein, a known virulence factor useful for antiphagocytosis, are encoded on the chromosome, and one albumin-binding protein homolog is encoded on the plasmid. A unique feature of the genome is that F. magna encodes many sortase genes, of which substrates may be involved in bacterial pathogenesis, such as antiphagocytosis and adherence to the host cell. The plasmid pPEP1 encodes seven sortase and seven substrate genes, whereas the chromosome encodes four sortase and 19 substrate genes. These plasmid-encoded sortases may play important roles in the pathogenesis of F. magna by enriching the variety of cell wall anchored surface proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18263572      PMCID: PMC2650633          DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsm030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) are a major part of the normal human flora colonizing skin and mucous membranes of the mouth and gastrointestinal tracts. GPAC account for 20–40% of all anaerobes recovered from human clinical specimens.[1-3] In GPAC, Finegoldia magna (formerly Peptostreptococcus magnus) has the highest pathogenicity and is isolated most frequently from various infection sites, including soft tissue, bone and joint, and diabetic foot infections.[1] Approximately 70% of F. magna strains recovered from human clinical materials coexist with other bacterial species such as group D streptococci, Staphylococcus, Bacteroides, and Fusobacterium.[4] Finegoldia magna has well-known cell surface proteins such as albumin-binding protein and protein L, which may contribute to antiphagocytosis by binding the cell surface to human serum albumin and immunoglobulin light chain, respectively.[5-7] Despite this clinical importance of F. magna, other virulence factors and overall genomic information of F. magna have not been extensively studied. Therefore, we have so far constructed the physical map[8] and the genetic map[9,10] of F. magna strain ATCC 29328, originally isolated from an abdominal wound. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of F. magna ATCC 29328 to characterize its genomic structure in detail and its nature as an opportunistic pathogen. This is the first complete genome sequence among GPAC, and we believe our data will be of great use for genetic studies of other GPAC as well as F. magna.

Materials and methods

Genome sequencing

The nucleotide sequence of the Finegoldia magna ATCC 29328 genome was determined by a whole-genome shotgun strategy. Briefly, F. magna ATCC 29328 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and was grown anaerobically at 37°C in liquid using Gifu Anaerobic Medium (GAM) (Nissui, Japan) for 39 h. The genomic DNA was isolated according to the conventional method using 0.4 mg/mL achromopeptidase (Wako, Japan), 1.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 2 mg Proteinase K (Roche, Germany). The isolated DNA was fragmented using the HydroShear process (GeneMachines Inc., USA). The fragmented DNA was fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis to isolate the short (1–2 kb) and the long (4–5 kb) fractions of fragments. The 1–2 kb and 4-5 kb DNA were ligated into a HincII-digested pTS1 plasmid vector (Nippon genetech, Japan). The short-insert and the long-insert plasmids were introduced by electroporation into Escherichia coli DH5α and SURE2 (Stratagene, USA), respectively. A total of 38 776 reads (providing a 10-fold coverage) from both ends of inserts was sequenced using dye-terminator chemistry with MegaBACE1000, MegaBACE4000 (GE Healthcare, USA) and ABI 3037xl automated sequencers (ABI, USA). Sequence assembly was carried out using the Phred/Phrap/Consed package.[11] Gaps were closed by PCR direct sequencing with oligonucleotide primers designed to anneal to each end of the neighboring contigs and by primer walking with bridge clones. Sequences of four rRNA operons were independently determined by genomic PCR and with BAC library.[9,10] Sequencing of one long repeated region on the chromosome was performed by nested-deletion methods using Kilo-sequence deletion kit (Takara, Japan). Finally, sequences of one complete circular chromosome and one complete plasmid were obtained. Overall accuracy of the finished sequence was estimated to have an error rate of <1 per 10 000 bases (Phrap score ≥40).

Bioinformatics

Protein coding regions (ORFs >150 bp) were identified using GenomeGambler 1.51,[12] CRITICA,[13] GeneHacker,[14] and Glimmer 2.015 programs. In the initial step of ORF prediction, 205 ORFs showing high similarity to the housekeeping proteins in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of Proteins (COGs) database[16] were selected and used to create the training data set for CRITICA, GeneHacker, and Glimmer programs. Individual predicted ORFs were reviewed manually for the presence of start codons (ATG, TTG, and GTG) and ribosome-binding sequences. Protein functional annotation was based on homology searches against NCBI's non-redundant protein database by BLASTP.[17] Transfer RNA genes were predicted by tRNAscan-SE.[18] Functional classification of ORFs was made by homology search against COGs using BLASTP. The metabolic pathway was constructed based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database[19] and was complemented manually according to pathways reported in several anaerobes.[20-23] Putative localization of predicted proteins was evaluated by the combination of PSORT[24] and SignalP program.[25] The characteristic motifs in all protein-coding sequence of ATCC 29328 genome were detected by the Pfam analyses (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/) and COGs database. Sortase homologs and their substrates from the sequences of 15 chromosomes and 30 plasmids derived from 15 Gram-positive bacteria species (include F. magna ATCC 29328), whose both chromosomes and plasmids were sequenced to date, were identified in silico according to methods described by Comfort and Clubb.[26] The genomic sequences and the protein tables of bacteria were obtained through the NCBI (National Center of Biological Information, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The complete genome sequence and annotation data of F. magna ATCC 29328 is available from the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database (accession nos. AP008971 and AP008972) and our web site (http://w4.grt.kyushu-u.ac.jp/Fmagna/).

Results and discussion

General genome features

The genome of F. magna ATCC 29328 consists of a circular chromosome (1 797 577 bp) and a plasmid pPEP1 (189 163 bp), with an average G + C content of 32.3 and 29.7%, respectively (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The chromosome size was in good agreement with the size (1886 ± 62 kb) estimated in the physical map which we constructed previously.[8] The recognition sites of ApaI, PmeI, SgrAI, and I-CeuI in our physical map[8] and the locations of ORFs in our genetic map[9,10] were in nearly agreement with those in the complete genome sequence, except missing of an ApaI-fragment (94 bp) in the chromosomal physical map and a inversion of PmeI fragments in the plasmid physical map. We could not find any regions showing significantly higher G + C content on the chromosome, except for four rRNA operon regions (Fig. 1). In the chromosome, we identified 1631 ORFs (FMG_0001–FMG_1631), covering 90.8% of the chromosome. Of these, 1177 (72.1%) could be assigned a putative function, 329 (20.2%) are conserved but the function unknown, and 125 (7.7%) are hypothetical genes unique to F. magna (Table 1). The replication origin of the chromosome was deduced on the basis of the transition point in GC-skew analysis and the vicinal presence of dnaA box.[27] A strong bias in gene orientation was observed, as 83.8% of ORFs on the chromosome are transcribed in the same orientation as DNA replication. Similarly, high bias in the gene orientation was observed in the genomes of Clostridium perfringens strain 1320 and Clostridium tetani E88,[21] respectively, and appears to be a common feature of low-GC Gram-positive bacteria.[20,28,29] Plasmid pPEP1 encodes 182 ORFs (FMG_P0001–FMG_P0182). Of these, 45 (24.7%) could be assigned a putative function, 29 (15.9%) are conserved but the function unknown, and 108 (59.4%) are hypothetical genes (Table 1). The replication origin of the plasmid could not be deduced by GC-skew analysis. Of the total ORFs on the plasmid, 87.4% were encoded on one strand DNA (Fig. 1). The F. magna genome encodes only a few mobile genetic elements. The density of transposase genes per 1 Mb of chromosome in low-GC Gram-positive bacteria ranges from high (10.5 per Mb) in Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS8283 to low (3.63 per Mb) in C. perfringens strain 13. F. magna ATCC 29328 has only one transposase gene (FMG_0928) (0.56 per Mb) on the chromosome. In the plasmid, 14 putative transposase genes were encoded, but four out of 14 were truncated. F. magna has nine putative phage-related ORFs on the chromosome; however, these genes do not constitute a prophage region. Assuming that F. magna is closely related to clostridia[10], F. magna has a stable chromosome, like clostridia, and recent events of gene acquisition by horizontal gene transfer are less likely.[20-22]
Figure 1

Circular maps of the chromosome and the pPEP1 plasmid of F. magna ATCC 29328. Each circle of represents (from inside out): G + C content, GC skew (G + C/G  −  C), tRNA genes, rRNA operons (all consisted of 16S–23S–5S rRNA genes), predicted genes transcribed into the counterclockwise direction, and those into clockwise direction. Green- and red-arrow heads show sortase homologs (srf1 to srf11) and their substrates, respectively, identified in silico from the ATCC 29328 genome. The identified substrates contain three albumin-binding protein homologs (abp2, abp3, and abp4). The pPEP1 has two clusters (cluster-I and -II), containing several surface proteins identified by PSORT analyses24 in one region. All of the predicted genes are colored according to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of Proteins functional classification.16

Table 1

Genome features of F. magna ATCC 29328

ChromosomePlasmid pPEP1
Length of sequence, bp1,797,577189,163
G + C content, %32.329.7
Total number of ORFs1,631182
 No. with assigned functions1,17745
 No. of conserved hypotheticals*32929
 No. of hypothetical proteins125108
Average ORF length, bp1,005888
Coding density, %90.885.4
rRNA operon40
tRNA gene480

*Conserved hypothetical protein, sequence similarity to a translation of another ORF; however, there is currently no known function.

†Hypothetical protein, no significant similarity to another protein.

Circular maps of the chromosome and the pPEP1 plasmid of F. magna ATCC 29328. Each circle of represents (from inside out): G + C content, GC skew (G + C/G  −  C), tRNA genes, rRNA operons (all consisted of 16S–23S–5S rRNA genes), predicted genes transcribed into the counterclockwise direction, and those into clockwise direction. Green- and red-arrow heads show sortase homologs (srf1 to srf11) and their substrates, respectively, identified in silico from the ATCC 29328 genome. The identified substrates contain three albumin-binding protein homologs (abp2, abp3, and abp4). The pPEP1 has two clusters (cluster-I and -II), containing several surface proteins identified by PSORT analyses24 in one region. All of the predicted genes are colored according to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of Proteins functional classification.16 Genome features of F. magna ATCC 29328 *Conserved hypothetical protein, sequence similarity to a translation of another ORF; however, there is currently no known function. †Hypothetical protein, no significant similarity to another protein.

Sugar and amino acid metabolisms

Most F. magna have a variety of aminopeptidase activities[30]; however, they have very limited saccharolytic activities.[1,31] It is known that most F. magna strains produce weak acid from the fermentation of fructose, and only a few strains produce weak acid from glucose, and all strains tested were unable to produce acid from maltose, mannose, and sucrose.[1,31] We found that F. magna ATCC 29328 has a complete glycolysis pathway only for fructose (Supplementary Fig. S1). Fructose could be taken in by a phosphotransferase system (PTS) for fructose and fed into glycolysis followed by production of acetate as a major end product. However, PTS genes for glucose, maltose, mannose, glucitol, cellobiose, and lactose were absent in the F. magna genome. PTS for mannitol, galactitol, and sucrose were incomplete. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle of F. magna ATCC 29328 was incomplete; only the step from pyruvate to fumarate was present (Supplementary Fig. S1). Similarly, incompleteness of the TCA cycle in clostridia such as C. tetani, C. acetobutylicum, and C. perfringens also has been reported.[20-22] F. magna ATCC 29328 has only gene sets for the production of acetate (and ethanol); although clostridia have complete gene sets for production of butyrate, acetate, lactate, and ethanol.[20-22] We also constructed a metabolic map of amino acid degradation to investigate which amino acids are used for energy acquisition in F. magna (Supplementary Fig. S1). The metabolic map showed that F. magna ATCC 29328 converts at least five amino acids (glycine, serine, threonine, aspartate, and asparagine) into pyruvate, and produces acetate and ATP. The metabolic map also showed that three (glycine, serine, and threonine) out of the five amino acids lead to NH3 production. As to amino acid biosynthesis pathways, F. magna ATCC 29328 has the complete gene sets required for biosynthesis of only five amino acids (glycine, serine, threonine, aspartate, and asparagine), suggesting that many of amino acids must be taken in from the environment (Supplementary Fig. S1). F. magna ATCC 29328 has many amino acid/oligopeptide transporters, enabling it to utilize amino acids as a major energy source by taking amino acids from the environment. As reported previously, F. magna has more aminopeptidase activities than other GPAC species.[30] Bacterial aminopeptidases are generally regarded as a tissue-degrading enzyme and bacteria can utilize the degradation products as a nutrient source. In F. magna ATCC 29328 genome, four carboxypeptidase genes and six aminopeptidase genes including a Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase gene were found. These peptidase genes may contribute to bacterial growth and could account for higher pathogenicity of F. magna in GPAC. Finegoldia magna ATCC 29328 has at least 249 transport-related genes, accounting for 15.3% of the total ORFs. Of them, 49 ATP-binding cassette transporter systems (ABC transporters) could be identified on the basis of the similarities with ABC transporters from E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.[32-34] These ABC transporters were divided into 14 importers (e.g., amino acid/oligopeptide importers) and 35 exporters (e.g., putative multidrug exporters) (Supplementary Fig. S1). We also found other types of transporters such as electron, ion, a fructose-specific PTS, amino acid/oligopeptide, and multidrug-efflux transporters. Finegoldia magna has two vacuolar (V)-type ATPases (one is similar to an ATPase of C. tetani and another is similar to that of Fusobacterium nucleatum), but it has no F0F1-type ATPase.

Regulation and stress responses

Transcriptional and translational regulators, and stress responses of F. magna are poorly understood. Finegoldia magna ATCC 29328 has an RNA polymerase core enzyme (composed of RpoA, RpoB, RpoC, and RpoZ subunits), a major sigma factor, and two general stress sigma factors, but it has no an ECF-type sigma factor,[35,36] which has been found in several Gram-positive bacteria. Finegoldia magna encodes 12 two-component regulator systems consisting of 13 sensor histidine kinases and 12 response regulators. An autoinducer-2 production protein LuxS related to a quorum-sensing system was encoded in the chromosome. The F. magna genome encodes no superoxide dismutase gene, but encodes genes for superoxide reductase, NADH oxidase, and putative NADH dehydrogenase. These genes may play a major role in enabling the organism to survive in intermediate aerobic conditions, such as mucosa and skin.

Virulence factors

Putative virulence factors were screened from all ORFs of F. magna ATCC 29328 genome by BLAST, SignalP, PSORT, and Pfam analyses. We found some putative virulence-related proteins with signal sequences and characteristic motifs (Supplementary Table S1). Interestingly, the F. magna ATCC 29328 genome encodes the following four albumin-binding protein homologs: three (FMG_1501, FMG_1517, and FMG_1523) in the chromosome and one (FMGP_0118) in the plasmid. These four proteins have regions similar to the albumin-binding modules (GA module)[6,37,38] in PAB and urPAB proteins derived from F. magna ALB8 and ALB1B strains, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2). These GA modules were also found in protein G from group C and G streptococci and in the protein L-like molecule from F. magna strain 3316.[39,40] Other virulence factors, except albumin-binding protein and protein L, have not been well studied in F. magna. In the ATCC 29328 genome, we found ten collagen adhesion protein homologs (Supplementary Table S1). These proteins possess several domains similar to the B-type domain (Pfam accession PF05738) in a collagen adhesion protein (Cna) derived from Staphylococcus aureus.[41] Furthermore, the ATCC 29328 genome encodes 20 N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase homologs (Cwp66 homologs) (Supplementary Table S1). These homologs have several putative cell wall binding repeat 2 (Pfam accession PF04122) motifs. The PF04122 motif is identified in autolysin and Cwp66, an adhesin of Clostridium difficile.[42] The Cwp66 has been suggested as a multifunctional protein[42]; the C-terminal domain of Cwp66 gave partial adherence ability of C. difficile to host cells, the N-terminal domain has homology to some autolysins and could contribute to autolysis. We are interested in whether Cwp66 homologs of F. magna can act as adhesins to host cells, since the Cwp66 of C. difficile has partial adherence ability and are regarded as a virulence factor. Moreover, the ATCC 29328 genome encodes putative virulence factors such as a cell wall-associated serine proteinase precursor (FMG_0035) and a putative biofilm-associated surface protein (FMG_1333) (Supplementary Table S1). Taken together, the pathogenic F. magna ATCC 29328 has several antiphagocytotic proteins such as albumin-binding proteins, and multiple putative host cell adhesins such as collagen adhesion proteins and Cwp66 homologs. Although the functions of these adhesins are not yet understood, future studies should disclose the mechanisms of virulence and the significance of F. magna as a member of the normal human flora. An extracellular transpeptidase, sortase, catalyzes cell wall anchoring of surface proteins by cleaving the threonine and glycine residues of conserved LPXTG-like motif.[43-46] Sortases (SrtA, SrtB) from Staphylococcus aureus were identified first and have been well studied recently.[47,48] Since some pathogens deficient in sortases exhibit reduced virulence, much interest has been focussed on sortase as a target for new antimicrobial agents.[43-46] Recently, Comfort and Clubb identified sortases and their substrates (surface proteins with the LPXTG-like motif) in silico from 241 bacterial chromosomes (96 species) sequenced completely, and they predicted some functional sortase–substrate linkages.[26] By the same method with Comfort, we identified sortases and their substrates from the ATCC 29328 genome and several Gram-positive bacterial genomes. The ATCC 29328 chromosome encoded four sortase homologs and 19 putative substrates (Figs. 1 and 2A and Table 2; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). These 19 putative substrates include two albumin-binding protein homologs (FMG_1517 and FMG_1523) and putative biofilm-associated surface protein (FMG_1333), which may act as virulence factor (Table 2; Supplementary Tables S1 and S3). Most interestingly, seven sortase homologs and seven substrates were identified from the plasmid pPEP1 (Figs. 1 and 2B and Table 2; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). These seven substrates include an albumin-binding protein homolog (FMG_P0118) and four putative collagen adhesion proteins (FMG_P0123, FMG_P0125, FMG_P0146, and FMG_P0149) (Table 2; Supplementary Tables S1 and S3).
Figure 2

Sortase homologs and substrates identified in silico from Gram-positive bacterial genomes. (A) Total number of ORFs in chromosome (15 species). (B) Total number of ORFs in plasmid (15 species, 30 plasmids). We identified ORFs from 15 Gram-positive bacterial species, whose both chromosomes and plasmids were sequenced to date. Abbreviations of bacterial species and detailed ORF data are showed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3.

Table 2

The substrates of sortases identified in F. magna ATCC 29328 genome

ORF no.Product nameMotif*SubfamilyCluster
Chromosome
 FMG_0037Putative collagen adhesion proteinLPESGSNo
 FMG_0095Conserved hypothetical proteinPAAASFNo
 FMG_0147Putative membrane proteinIALTAVNo
 FMG_0186Hypothetical proteinYPLTGAYes
 FMG_0187Cell wall surface anchor family proteinIPQTGG3Yes
 FMG_0188Putative cell wall surface anchor family proteinIPKTGD3Yes
 FMG_0229Putative surface protein precursorLPKAGTNo
 FMG_0238Branched-chain amino acid transporterLPLSSVNo
 FMG_0261Conserved hypothetical proteinYAASKSNo
 FMG_0595Phosphate ABC transporter permease proteinMAYASGNo
 FMG_0616Cell division protein homologIPPTGLNo
 FMG_0717Cell division protein RodA homologMPITGINo
 FMG_1103Conserved hypothetical proteinVPFAGLNo
 FMG_1333Putative biofilm-associated surface proteinLPKAGINo
 FMG_1335Hypothetical proteinLPKAGANo
 FMG_1352Hypothetical proteinLPKAGYNo
 FMG_1517Albumin-binding protein homolog-2LPKAGSNo
 FMG_1523Putative albumin-binding protein homolog-3LPKAGINo
 FMG_1550Conserved hypothetical proteinLPKAGSNo
Plasmid
 FMG_P0118Albumin-binding protein homolog-4 like protein LLPKAGSYes
 FMG_P0119Hypothetical proteinLPKAGVYes
 FMG_P0121Hypothetical proteinYAKTNIYes
 FMG_P0123Putative collagen adhesion proteinVAIAGGYes
 FMG_P0125Putative collagen adhesion proteinLPVTGLYes
 FMG_P0146Putative collagen adhesion proteinIPSTGTYes
 FMG_P0149Putative collagen adhesion proteinVPGTGTYes

*LPXTG-like motifs in substrates. These motifs were identified according to the methods of Comfort and Clubb.26

†Categorization into subfamilies according to sequence homology using PSI-BLAST profiles and a hidden Markov model.‘3’ and ‘—’ show the subfamily-3 and the unclassified subfamily, respectively, which were defined by Comfort.26

‡‘Yes’ shows that a sortase is genomically adjacent to its substrate.

Sortase homologs and substrates identified in silico from Gram-positive bacterial genomes. (A) Total number of ORFs in chromosome (15 species). (B) Total number of ORFs in plasmid (15 species, 30 plasmids). We identified ORFs from 15 Gram-positive bacterial species, whose both chromosomes and plasmids were sequenced to date. Abbreviations of bacterial species and detailed ORF data are showed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. The substrates of sortases identified in F. magna ATCC 29328 genome *LPXTG-like motifs in substrates. These motifs were identified according to the methods of Comfort and Clubb.26 †Categorization into subfamilies according to sequence homology using PSI-BLAST profiles and a hidden Markov model.‘3’ and ‘—’ show the subfamily-3 and the unclassified subfamily, respectively, which were defined by Comfort.26 ‡‘Yes’ shows that a sortase is genomically adjacent to its substrate. By the same method with Comfort, we predicted functional sortase–substrate linkages for all sortases and substrates identified from the tested genomes. From the ATCC 29328 genome, we predicted some linkage among two sortases (FMG_0189 and FMG_0190) and two substrates (FMG_0187 and FMG_0188), because these four ORFs belong to a common family (Family 3 defined by Comfort) and are located on one cluster in the chromosome (Table 2; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). The remaining sortases and substrates of F. magna were assigned to an unclassified family (defined by Comfort), and their sortase–substrate linkages could not be predicted. Assuming that an unclassified substrate and its sortase in a common genomic cluster may have some functional linkage,[26] eight out of the 24 unclassified substrates can be linked to their specific sortases (Table 2; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). These predicted sortase–substrate linkages on the genome should be further elucidated experimentally. For example, if we can identify a sortase that specifically recognize the LPKAG motif in albumin-binding proteins, it will lead to the development of sortase inhibitors as new antimicrobial agents.[43] To our knowledge, the pPEP1 plasmid may have the largest number of sortase genes among Gram-positive bacterial plasmids analysed so far, because we searched sortases and their substrates in 29 plasmids of 14 Gram-positive bacterial species, except for F. magna, and found that no plasmids have a sortase gene, except for C. perfringens str.13 plasmid (pCP13) with a sortase gene (PCP56) (Fig. 2B; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). We could not find a remarkable feature about the number of sortases and substrates among Gram-positive bacterial chromosomes (Fig. 2A). The presence of as many as seven sortase genes in a plasmid may be unique to F. magna, since there are no sortase genes even on the large plasmids of the following Gram-positive species: Bacillus anthracis pXO1 (181 677 bp), Bacillus cereus pBc10987 (208 369 bp), and C. acetobutylicum pSOL1 (192 000 bp).

Conclusions

This is the first report of a whole genome sequence of a member of any known GPAC. The sequence information presented and analysed here will contribute to an understanding of the taxonomy and pathogenicity of GPAC. The reason why F. magna is isolated most frequently and has the highest pathogenicity in GPAC may be due to the fact that F. magna genome encodes abundant aminopeptidases, multiple transporters and some virulence factors (e.g., albumin-binding proteins, Cwp66 homologs, and collagen adhesion proteins), beside with the limited capabilities of F. magna for sugar utilization and amino acid biosynthesis. It is of particular interest that four sortase genes were identified on the chromosome and that seven sortase genes were identified on the plasmid. Seven plasmid-encoded sortase genes unique to F. magna are of special interest, considering that plasmids are commonly considered to be of foreign origin. These mobile element-encoded sortases may play important roles in the pathogenesis of F. magna by enriching the variety of cell wall anchored surface proteins, which may enhance the interaction with host tissues and with other bacteria in mixed infection sites. Future studies, such as sortase–substrate linkage analyses and animal model experiments using sortase-negative mutant strains, will be required to clarify the roles of sortase on pathogenesis in F. magna.
  45 in total

1.  Sortase: the surface protein anchoring transpeptidase and the LPXTG motif.

Authors:  R P Novick
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Modeling and predicting transcriptional units of Escherichia coli genes using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  T Yada; M Nakao; Y Totoki; K Nakai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  An automated system for genome analysis to support microbial whole-genome shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  T Sakiyama; H Takami; N Ogasawara; S Kuhara; T Kozuki; K Doga; A Ohyama; K Horikoshi
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.043

4.  A comparative genome analysis identifies distinct sorting pathways in gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  David Comfort; Robert T Clubb
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Genome sequence and analysis of the oral bacterium Fusobacterium nucleatum strain ATCC 25586.

Authors:  Vinayak Kapatral; Iain Anderson; Natalia Ivanova; Gary Reznik; Tamara Los; Athanasios Lykidis; Anamitra Bhattacharyya; Allen Bartman; Warren Gardner; Galina Grechkin; Lihua Zhu; Olga Vasieva; Lien Chu; Yakov Kogan; Oleg Chaga; Eugene Goltsman; Axel Bernal; Niels Larsen; Mark D'Souza; Theresa Walunas; Gordon Pusch; Robert Haselkorn; Michael Fonstein; Nikos Kyrpides; Ross Overbeek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Physical and genetic map of the Finegoldia magna (formerly Peptostreptococcus magnus) ATCC 29328 genome.

Authors:  Kozo Todo; Takatsugu Goto; Kazuaki Miyamoto; Shigeru Akimoto
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Comparative analysis of the four rRNA operons in Finegoldia magna ATCC29328.

Authors:  Kozo Todo; Takatsugu Goto; Akio Honda; Mieko Tamura; Kazuaki Miyamoto; Shigeyuki Fujita; Shigeru Akimoto
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  The genome sequence of Clostridium tetani, the causative agent of tetanus disease.

Authors:  Holger Bruggemann; Sebastian Baumer; Wolfgang Florian Fricke; Arnim Wiezer; Heiko Liesegang; Iwona Decker; Christina Herzberg; Rosa Martinez-Arias; Rainer Merkl; Anke Henne; Gerhard Gottschalk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Whole-body autoradiography reveals that the Peptostreptococcus magnus immunoglobulin-binding domains of protein L preferentially target B lymphocytes in the spleen and lymph nodes in vivo.

Authors:  David Smith; Roland D'Argy; Mats Nilsson; Ulf Yrlid; James de Jersey; Lars Björck; Mary Jo Wick
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.715

10.  Bacterial artificial chromosome library of Finegoldia magna ATCC 29328 for genetic mapping and comparative genomics.

Authors:  Takatsugu Goto; Kozo Todo; Kazuaki Miyamoto; Shigeru Akimoto
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.955

View more
  17 in total

1.  Genome sequence of Peptoniphilus rhinitidis 1-13T, an anaerobic coccus strain isolated from clinical specimens.

Authors:  Dae-Soo Kim; Min Young Jung; Aram Kang; Jaehoon Cho; Yeseul Sin; Jayoung Paek; Dong-Wook Kim; Ryong Nam Kim; Seong-Hyeuk Nam; Aeri Kim; Hong-Seog Park; Sang-Haeng Choi; Young-Hyo Chang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  A global network of coexisting microbes from environmental and whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Samuel Chaffron; Hubert Rehrauer; Jakob Pernthaler; Christian von Mering
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically relevant Gram-positive anaerobic cocci collected over a three-year period in the Netherlands.

Authors:  A C M Veloo; G W Welling; J E Degener
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  An exploration of Prevotella-rich microbiomes in HIV and men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Abigail J S Armstrong; Michael Shaffer; Nichole M Nusbacher; Christine Griesmer; Suzanne Fiorillo; Jennifer M Schneider; C Preston Neff; Sam X Li; Andrew P Fontenot; Thomas Campbell; Brent E Palmer; Catherine A Lozupone
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 5.  The RepA_N replicons of Gram-positive bacteria: a family of broadly distributed but narrow host range plasmids.

Authors:  Keith E Weaver; Stephen M Kwong; Neville Firth; Maria Victoria Francia
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  A pilot study investigating lactic acid bacterial symbionts from the honeybee in inhibiting human chronic wound pathogens.

Authors:  Éile Butler; Rut F Oien; Christina Lindholm; Tobias C Olofsson; Bo Nilson; Alejandra Vásquez
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Exploration of bacterial community classes in major human habitats.

Authors:  Yanjiao Zhou; Kathie A Mihindukulasuriya; Hongyu Gao; Patricio S La Rosa; Kristine M Wylie; John C Martin; Karthik Kota; William D Shannon; Makedonka Mitreva; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Roland Wirth; Etelka Kovács; Gergely Maróti; Zoltán Bagi; Gábor Rákhely; Kornél L Kovács
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Complete genome sequence of a serotype 11A, ST62 Streptococcus pneumoniae invasive isolate.

Authors:  Romina Camilli; Raoul J P Bonnal; Maria Del Grosso; Michele Iacono; Giorgio Corti; Ermanno Rizzi; Magda Marchetti; Laura Mulas; Francesco Iannelli; Fabiana Superti; Marco R Oggioni; Gianluca De Bellis; Annalisa Pantosti
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  SufA - a bacterial enzyme that cleaves fibrinogen and blocks fibrin network formation.

Authors:  Christofer Karlsson; Matthias Mörgelin; Mattias Collin; Rolf Lood; Marie-Louise Andersson; Artur Schmidtchen; Lars Björck; Inga-Maria Frick
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.