Literature DB >> 18262130

Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.

Gwe-Ya Kim1, Todd Pawlicki, Quynh-Thu Le, Gary Luxton.   

Abstract

Kilovoltage imaging systems on linear accelerators are used for patient localization in many clinics. The purpose of this work is to assess on-board imaging (OBI) detection of systematic setup errors and in particular, the dosimetric consequences of undetected head roll in head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans when using these systems. The system used in this study was the Trilogy linear accelerator and associated software (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Accuracy of OBI localization was evaluated using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The head phantom is rigidly attached to a specially designed positioning device with 5 degrees of freedom, 3 translational and 2 rotational in the axial and coronal planes. Simulated setup errors were 3 degrees and 5 degrees rotations in the axial plane and displacements of 5 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions. The coordinates set by the positioning device were compared with the coordinates obtained as measured by using the image matching tools of paired 2-dimensional (2D) orthogonal image matching, and 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CT) volume matching. In addition, 6 physician-approved IMRT plans of nasopharynx and tonsil carcinoma were recalculated to evaluate the impact of undetected 3 degrees and 5 degrees head roll. Application of cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patient localization was superior to 2D matching techniques for detecting rotational setup errors. The use of CBCT allowed the determination of translational errors to within 0.5 mm, whereas kV planar was within 1 to 2 mm. Head roll in the axial plane was not easily detected with orthogonal image sets. Compared to the IMRT plans with no head roll, dose-volume histogram analysis demonstrated an average increase in the maximal spinal cord dose of 3.1% and 6.4% for 3 degrees and 5 degrees angles of rotation, respectively. Dose to the contralateral parotid was unchanged with 3 degrees roll and increased by 2.7% with 5 degrees roll. The results of this study show that volumetric setup verification using CBCT can improve bony anatomy setup detection to millimeter accuracy, and is a reliable method to detect head roll. However, the magnitude of possible dose errors due to undetected head roll suggests that CBCT does not need to be performed on a daily basis but rather weekly or bi-weekly to ensure fidelity of the head position with the immobilization system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18262130     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  14 in total

1.  Use of kilovoltage X-ray volume imaging in patient dose calculation for head-and-neck and partial brain radiation therapy.

Authors:  Weigang Hu; Jinsong Ye; Jiazhou Wang; Xuejun Ma; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Todd J Scarbrough; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Coen R N Rasch; Mehee Choi; Joe Y Ting; Samuel J Wang; Niko Papanikolaou; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Influence of rotations on dose distributions in spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Orit Gutfeld; Annette E Kretzler; Rojano Kashani; Daniel Tatro; James M Balter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Yin; Ying Sun; Feng Chi; Jian-Lan Fang; Rui Guo; Xiao-Li Yu; Yan-Ping Mao; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Guo; Meng-Zhong Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Zhaozhi Yang; Jiazhou Wang; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  MRI-based Assessment of 3D Intrafractional Motion of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Dualta McQuaid; Alex Dunlop; Kee H Wong; Liam C Welsh; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh; Uwe Oelfke; Martin O Leach; Christopher M Nutting; Shreerang A Bhide; Kevin J Harrington; Rafal Panek; Kate L Newbold
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jean L Peng; Chihray Liu; Yu Chen; Robert J Amdur; Kenneth Vanek; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Recent advances in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; Daniel R Simpson; Brent S Rose; Ajay P Sandhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Inderjit Kaur; Sheh Rawat; Parveen Ahlawat; Anjali Kakria; Gourav Gupta; Upasna Saxena; Manindra Bhushan Mishra
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Guo-Ping Shan; Ji-Ping Liu; Bin-Bing Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.