Literature DB >> 18261164

Screening for partial conjunction hypotheses.

Yoav Benjamini1, Ruth Heller.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We consider the problem of testing for partial conjunction of hypothesis, which argues that at least u out of n tested hypotheses are false. It offers an in-between approach to the testing of the conjunction of null hypotheses against the alternative that at least one is not, and the testing of the disjunction of null hypotheses against the alternative that all hypotheses are not null. We suggest powerful test statistics for testing such a partial conjunction hypothesis that are valid under dependence between the test statistics as well as under independence. We then address the problem of testing many partial conjunction hypotheses simultaneously using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach. We prove that if the FDR controlling procedure in Benjamini and Hochberg (1995, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57, 289-300) is used for this purpose the FDR is controlled under various dependency structures. Moreover, we can screen at all levels simultaneously in order to display the findings on a superimposed map and still control an appropriate FDR measure. We apply the method to examples from microarray analysis and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two application areas where the need for partial conjunction analysis has been identified.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18261164     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00984.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  45 in total

1.  Bayesian genome- and epigenome-wide association studies with gene level dependence.

Authors:  Eric F Lock; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  False Discovery Control in Large-Scale Spatial Multiple Testing.

Authors:  Wenguang Sun; Brian J Reich; T Tony Cai; Michele Guindani; Armin Schwartzman
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Selective inference in complex research.

Authors:  Yoav Benjamini; Ruth Heller; Daniel Yekutieli
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The STAT4/MLL1 Epigenetic Axis Regulates the Antimicrobial Functions of Murine Macrophages.

Authors:  William F Carson; Karen A Cavassani; Elyara M Soares; Soichiro Hirai; Nicolai A Kittan; Matthew A Schaller; Melissa M Scola; Amrita Joshi; Akihiro Matsukawa; David M Aronoff; Craig N Johnson; Yali Dou; Katherine A Gallagher; Steven L Kunkel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  P-value evaluation, variability index and biomarker categorization for adaptively weighted Fisher's meta-analysis method in omics applications.

Authors:  Zhiguang Huo; Shaowu Tang; Yongseok Park; George Tseng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  MiR-486-5p Downregulation Marks an Early Event in Colorectal Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Kelley; Nicole Wieghard; Yuki Chin; Amiee Potter; Motomi Mori; Melissa H Wong; Koei Chin; V Liana Tsikitis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  TreeQTL: hierarchical error control for eQTL findings.

Authors:  C B Peterson; M Bogomolov; Y Benjamini; C Sabatti
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown's method.

Authors:  William Poole; David L Gibbs; Ilya Shmulevich; Brady Bernard; Theo A Knijnenburg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Whole-Transcriptome Analysis of Mouse Models with MPTP-Induced Early Stages of Parkinson's Disease Reveals Stage-Specific Response of Transcriptome and a Possible Role of Myelin-Linked Genes in Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  A Kh Alieva; V S Zyrin; M M Rudenok; A A Kolacheva; M V Shulskaya; M V Ugryumov; P A Slominsky; M I Shadrina
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 5.590

10.  Weighted false discovery rate controlling procedures for clinical trials.

Authors:  Yoav Benjamini; Rami Cohen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.