Literature DB >> 18260769

How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors?

I M E Wentholt1, A A M Hart, J B L Hoekstra, J H Devries.   

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors may be valuable tools for improving glycemic control and avoiding hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. To this goal, sensor readings must adequately reflect the actual blood glucose, emphasizing the need for solid accuracy assessment methods for continuous glucose sensor readings. Analysis of continuous glucose data is challenging, and despite many efforts there still is no all-embracing method to overcome the obstacles in the assessment of continuous data. In this review we disclose the weaknesses of currently available methods and propose a guideline for sensor accuracy assessment and comparison. For accuracy assessment it is best to first plot the sensor readings against the reference values and draw a line of identity, visualizing the degree of agreement. Thereafter data pairs should be given in a Bland-Altman plot to detect a possible relationship between the difference and the mean. The next step is to calculate the absolute relative difference over all paired readings together and per glucose range. A possible lag time between the measurements of both methods can be detected by combined curve fitting. Finally, sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting hypoglycemia are important indicators of the sensors' performance. For comparing the accuracy between different glucose sensors it is best to use indirect comparison against blood glucose, rather than direct comparison methods, since none of the current glucose sensors is accurate enough to be considered the reference value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18260769     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2007.0216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  15 in total

1.  Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform?

Authors:  A J M Boulton; S Del Prato
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Analysis of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study.

Authors:  K M Venkat Narayan; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Analysis: The Accuracy and Efficacy of the Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Cornelis A J van Beers; J H DeVries
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-27

4.  The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in Chinese diabetes patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Xiaofeng Lv; Yiming Mu; Xianling Wang; Jing Li; Xingguang Zhang; Jinxiao Wu; Yuqian Bao; Weiping Jia
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Improved glycemic control through continuous glucose sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: prospective results from a community and academic practice patient registry.

Authors:  Ohad Cohen; Anna Körner; Rudolf Chlup; Christos S Zoupas; Anton K Ragozin; Krisztina Wudi; Dagmar Bartaskova; Aggelos Pappas; Tamás Niederland; Zoltán Taybani; Lubomir Barák; Andriani Vazeou
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Anna Chang; Mark Christiansen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03

7.  Effect of BGM Accuracy on the Clinical Performance of CGM: An In-Silico Study.

Authors:  Enrique Campos-Náñez; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-31

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center.

Authors:  Yoeri M Luijf; Angelo Avogaro; Carsten Benesch; Daniela Bruttomesso; Claudio Cobelli; Martin Ellmerer; Lutz Heinemann; Julia K Mader; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.

Authors:  Karin Obermaier; Günther Schmelzeisen-Redeker; Michael Schoemaker; Hans-Martin Klötzer; Harald Kirchsteiger; Heino Eikmeier; Luigi del Re
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

10.  An automated discontinuous venous blood sampling system for ex vivo glucose determination in humans.

Authors:  Roland Schaller; Franz Feichtner; Hans Köhler; Manfred Bodenlenz; Johannes Plank; Andrea Wutte; Julia K Mader; Martin Ellmerer; Reinhard Hainisch; Thomas R Pieber; Lukas Schaupp
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.