Literature DB >> 15377940

Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Okka W Hamer1, Markus Völk, Niels Zorger, Ingitha Borisch, Roland Büttner, Stefan Feuerbach, Michael Strotzer.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study evaluating a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon-based flat-panel detector was to optimize the x-ray spectrum for chest radiography combining excellent contrast-detail visibility with reduced patient exposure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Lucite plate with 36 drilled holes of varying diameter and depth was used as contrast-detail phantom. For 3 scatter body thicknesses (7.5 cm, 12.5 cm, 21.5 cm Lucite) images were obtained at 113 kVp, 117 kVp, and 125 kVp with additional copper filter of 0.2 and 0.3 mm, respectively. For each setting, radiographs acquired with 125 kVp and no copper filter were taken as standard of reference. On soft-copy displays, 3 observers blinded to the exposure technique evaluated the detectability of each aperture in each image according to a 5-point scale. The number of points given to all 36 holes per image was added. The scores of images acquired with filtration were compared with the standard images by means of a multivariate analysis of variance. Radiation burden was approximated by referring to the entrance dose and calculated using Monte Carlo method.
RESULTS: All 6 evaluated x-ray spectra resulted in a statistically equivalent contrast-detail performance when compared with the standard of reference. The combination 125 kVp with 0.3 mm copper was most favorable in terms of dose reduction (approximately 33%).
CONCLUSION: Within the constraints of the presented contrast-detail phantom study simulating chest radiography, the CsI/a-Si system enables an addition of up to 0.3 mm copper filtration without the need for compensatory reduction of the tube voltage for providing constant image quality. Beam filtration reduces radiation burden by about 33%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377940     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000138091.96320.f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  1 in total

Review 1.  [Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].

Authors:  M Uffmann; C Schaefer-Prokop; U Neitzel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.