Literature DB >> 18259591

The impact of word-end phonology and morphology on stuttering.

Chloe Marshall1.   

Abstract

This paper investigates whether stuttering rates in English-speaking adults and children are influenced by phonological and morphological complexity at the ends of words. The phonology of English inflection is such that morphological and phonological complexity are confounded, and previous research has indicated that phonological complexity influences stuttering. Section 1 of this paper considers how to disentangle phonological and morphological complexity so that the impact of each on stuttering can be tested. Section 2 presents an analysis of some adult corpus data, and shows that phonological and morphological complexity at the word end do not influence stuttering rates for English-speaking adults, at least in spontaneous speech. Section 3 presents results from a non-word repetition task and a past tense elicitation task which reveal that while word-end phonological and morphological complexity do not affect stuttering rates in most of the adults and children tested, a small proportion of adults and children do stutter over morphologically complex words in an elicitation task. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that morphology has an impact on stuttering for some individuals in certain circumstances.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 18259591      PMCID: PMC2231591     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stammering Res        ISSN: 1742-5867


  17 in total

1.  Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age.

Authors:  P Howell; J Au-Yeung; S Sackin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Klara Marton; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Planning and execution processes in speech control by fluent speakers and speakers who stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Katharina Dworzynski
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  L B Leonard; J A Eyer; L M Bedore; B G Grela
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Word familiarity, syllabic stress pattern, and stuttering.

Authors:  C P Hubbard; D Prins
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06

6.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; P L Cleave
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08

7.  Relation between phonologic difficulty and the occurrence of disfluences in the early stage of stuttering.

Authors:  R N Throneburg; E Yairi; E P Paden
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06

8.  Nonword repetition abilities of children who stutter: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Haya Berman Hakim; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Facilities to assist people to research into stammered speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Mark Huckvale
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-07-01

10.  Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study.

Authors:  D V Bishop; T North; C Donlan
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The University College London Archive of Stuttered Speech (UCLASS).

Authors:  Peter Howell; Stephen Davis; Jon Bartrip
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.