Literature DB >> 34783914

Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.

Takumi Hasegawa1, Aki Sasaki2, Izumi Saito2, Satomi Arimoto2, Nanae Yatagai2, Yujiro Hiraoka2, Daisuke Takeda2, Yasumasa Kakei2, Masaya Akashi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the success and survival rates of dental implants used for dentomaxillary prostheses at our hospital and the risk factors associated with large bone defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 external joint system implants used for dentomaxillary prostheses in 40 patients with large bone defects were included in this study. The alveolar bone at the site of implant insertion was evaluated using panoramic radiography and computed tomography. Various risk factors (demographic characteristics, dental status, and operative factors such as the employment of alveolar bone augmentation, the site, the length, and diameter of implants) for implant failure and complete implant loss were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The associations between the variables and the success and survival rates of dental implants were analyzed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: The 10-year overall success and survival rates were 81.3% and 88.4% in this study. Multivariable analysis showed that the male sex (HR 6.22), shorter implants (≤ 8.5 mm) (HR 5.21), and bone augmentation (HR 2.58) were independent predictors of success rate. Bone augmentation (HR 5.14) and narrow implants (≤ 3.3 mm) (HR 3.86) were independent predictors of the survival rate.
CONCLUSION: Male sex, shorter or narrow implants, and bone augmentation were independent risk factors for dental implants used in dentomaxillary prostheses in patients with large bone defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should consider these risk factors and pay close attention to the management of these patients.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implant; Dentomaxillary prosthesis; Failure; Oncologic patients; Success

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34783914     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04249-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  41 in total

Review 1.  Implant survival rate after oral cancer therapy: a review.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Khalid Al-Hezaimi; Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed; Khalid Almas; George E Romanos
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.337

2.  Long-term dental implant success and survival--a clinical study after an observation period up to 6 years.

Authors:  Olga Charyeva; Kubeysin Altynbekov; Rahmed Zhartybaev; Asylbek Sabdanaliev
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2012

3.  Survival of Brånemark System Mk III implants and analysis of risk factors associated with implant failure.

Authors:  T Hasegawa; S Kawabata; D Takeda; E Iwata; I Saito; S Arimoto; A Kimoto; M Akashi; H Suzuki; T Komori
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Dieter Busenlechner; Rudolf Fürhauser; Robert Haas; Georg Watzek; Georg Mailath; Bernhard Pommer
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Implant-based rehabilitation in oncology patients can be performed with high long-term success.

Authors:  Sarah A Hessling; Falk Wehrhan; Christian M Schmitt; Manuel Weber; Tilo Schlittenbauer; Martin Scheer
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Efficacy of dental implants placed into fibula-free flaps for orofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Franz-Josef Kramer; Rupert Dempf; Bernd Bremer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Patients with oral tumors. Part 2: Quality of life after treatment with resection prostheses. Resection prosthetics: evaluation of quality of life.

Authors:  Janine Fierz; Walter Bürgin; Regina Mericske-Stern
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  2013

8.  Implant survival or implant success? Evaluation of implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients-a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Tobias Ettl; Natalie Junold; Florian Zeman; Matthias Hautmann; Sebastian Hahnel; Carola Kolbeck; Steffen Müller; Christoph Klingelhöffer; Torsten E Reichert; Johannes K Meier
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Patients with oral tumors. Part 1: Prosthetic rehabilitation following tumor resection.

Authors:  Janine Fierz; Wok Hallermann; Regina Mericske-Stern
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  2013

10.  Prosthetic rehabilitation, implant survival and quality of life 2 to 5 years after resection of oral tumors.

Authors:  Joannis Katsoulis; Janine Fierz; Takeyuki IIzuka; Regina Mericske-Stern
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.259

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Factors Implicated in Zirconia Implant Fracture Placed within the Anterior Region-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauryn Attard; Victoria Lee; Jennifer Le; Chloe Lowe; Vipra Singh; Jacky Zhao; Dileep Sharma
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.