Literature DB >> 18253700

Improving database enrichment through ensemble docking.

Shashidhar Rao1, Paul C Sanschagrin, Jeremy R Greenwood, Matthew P Repasky, Woody Sherman, Ramy Farid.   

Abstract

While it may seem intuitive that using an ensemble of multiple conformations of a receptor in structure-based virtual screening experiments would necessarily yield improved enrichment of actives relative to using just a single receptor, it turns out that at least in the p38 MAP kinase model system studied here, a very large majority of all possible ensembles do not yield improved enrichment of actives. However, there are combinations of receptor structures that do lead to improved enrichment results. We present here a method to select the ensembles that produce the best enrichments that does not rely on knowledge of active compounds or sophisticated analyses of the 3D receptor structures. In the system studied here, the small fraction of ensembles of up to 3 receptors that do yield good enrichments of actives were identified by selecting ensembles that have the best mean GlideScore for the top 1% of the docked ligands in a database screen of actives and drug-like "decoy" ligands. Ensembles of two receptors identified using this mean GlideScore metric generally outperform single receptors, while ensembles of three receptors identified using this metric consistently give optimal enrichment factors in which, for example, 40% of the known actives outrank all the other ligands in the database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18253700     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9182-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  21 in total

1.  Modeling correlated main-chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition.

Authors:  Maria I Zavodszky; Ming Lei; M F Thorpe; Anthony R Day; Leslie A Kuhn
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Karine Bastard; Chantal Prévost; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

5.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

7.  Lessons in molecular recognition. 2. Assessing and improving cross-docking accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sutherland; Ravi K Nandigam; Jon A Erickson; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  V Schnecke; C A Swanson; E D Getzoff; J A Tainer; L A Kuhn
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-10-01

9.  Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.

Authors:  D M Lorber; B K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site.

Authors:  Christopher Pargellis; Liang Tong; Laurie Churchill; Pier F Cirillo; Thomas Gilmore; Anne G Graham; Peter M Grob; Eugene R Hickey; Neil Moss; Susan Pav; John Regan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04
View more
  28 in total

1.  Molecular mechanism of serotonin transporter inhibition elucidated by a new flexible docking protocol.

Authors:  Mari Gabrielsen; Rafał Kurczab; Aina W Ravna; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Zdzisław Chilmonczyk; Andrzej J Bojarski; Ingebrigt Sylte
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Computational fragment-based screening using RosettaLigand: the SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Virtual screening using a conformationally flexible target protein: models for ligand binding to p38α MAPK.

Authors:  Natalie B Vinh; Jamie S Simpson; Peter J Scammells; David K Chalmers
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Discovery of novel checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by virtual screening based on multiple crystal structures.

Authors:  Yan Li; Dong Joon Kim; Weiya Ma; Ronald A Lubet; Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Closing the side-chain gap in protein loop modeling.

Authors:  Karen A Rossi; Akbar Nayeem; Carolyn A Weigelt; Stanley R Krystek
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Consensus Induced Fit Docking (cIFD): methodology, validation, and application to the discovery of novel Crm1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Ori Kalid; Dora Toledo Warshaviak; Sharon Shechter; Woody Sherman; Sharon Shacham
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Enhancing Virtual Screening Performance of Protein Kinases with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Tavina L Offutt; Robert V Swift; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization.

Authors:  Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.