Literature DB >> 18248684

Origin and evolution of candidate mental retardation genes on the human X chromosome (MRX).

Margaret L Delbridge1, Daniel A McMillan, Ruth J Doherty, Janine E Deakin, Jennifer A Marshall Graves.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human X chromosome has a biased gene content. One group of genes that is over-represented on the human X are those expressed in the brain, explaining the large number of sex-linked mental retardation (MRX) syndromes.
RESULTS: To determine if MRX genes were recruited to the X, or whether their brain-specific functions were acquired after relocation to the mammalian X chromosome, we examined the location and expression of their orthologues in marsupials, which diverged from human approximately 180 million years ago. We isolated and mapped nine tammar wallaby MRX homologues, finding that six were located on the tammar wallaby X (which represents the ancient conserved mammal X) and three on chromosome 5, representing the recently added region of the human X chromosome. The location of MRX genes within the same synteny groups in human and wallaby does not support the hypothesis that genes with an important function in the brain were recruited in multiple independent events from autosomes to the mammalian X chromosome. Most of the tammar wallaby MRX homologues were more widely expressed in tammar wallaby than in human. Only one, the tammar wallaby ARX homologue (located on tammar chromosome 5p), has a restricted expression pattern comparable to its pattern in human. The retention of the brain-specific expression of ARX over 180 million years suggests that this gene plays a fundamental role in mammalian brain development and function.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest all the genes in this study may have originally had more general functions that became more specialised and important in brain function during evolution of humans and other placental mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248684      PMCID: PMC2276207          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

For more than a century, it has been obvious that mental retardation is far more frequent in human males than females, and there have been many claims over the years that inherited mental retardation (MR) syndromes are concentrated on the X chromosome [1,2]. Several well studied X-borne genes have an effect on general cognitive abilities, including FMR1 (fragile X syndrome) and FMR2 (FRAXE mental retardation), as well as a large number of X-linked mental retardation (MRX) syndromes that have been mapped but not cloned and characterised [3]. Attempts to prove that MRX genes are located disproportionately on the X have suffered from experimental ascertainment bias, since recessive MRX genes are more easily recognised in hemizygous males. However, one analysis of the OMIM database corrected for any ascertainment bias by comparing the proportions of X-linked phenotypes of MR syndromes to that of other abnormalities [4]. Another analysis tested whether the over-representation of MRX syndromes would disappear if as yet unmapped MR genes were evenly distributed across the genome [5]. Both analyses concluded that mental retardation syndromes are significantly concentrated on the human X chromosome. Other gene functions have also been found to be unequally represented on the human X chromosome. For example, early spermatogonial genes, sex and reproduction related (SRR) and prostate-specific genes are over-represented on the X in humans and mice, whereas there is a paucity of genes involved in late spermatogenesis [6-10]. How this over-representation occurred has been the subject of much speculation, and several alternative hypotheses have been considered. One possibility is that brain function genes, or copies of them, were moved one by one to the X from autosomes, another is that the over-representation of genes on the X was the result of the translocation of a larger autosomal region already rich in brain function genes to the X. Alternatively, it has been suggested that the gene content of the X chromosome has remained unchanged since its autosomal origin, but some X-borne genes have acquired new functions in brain development. These hypotheses must be tested within the framework of human sex chromosome evolution. Mammals have an XX female: XY male chromosomal sex determination system, in which a gene on the Y chromosome controls male development. Homology between the X and Y chromosomes supports the hypothesis that the mammalian X and Y chromosomes differentiated from a homologous autosomal pair (the proto-X and proto-Y) when one member acquired a male-determining allele. Suppression of recombination between the X and Y, loss of active genes and accumulation of mutations on the Y resulted in the progressive degradation of the Y such that most genes on the X chromosome have no homologue on the Y chromosome. The X chromosome gene content of different eutherian mammals is highly conserved, perhaps because of the chromosome-wide dosage compensation mechanism that ensures equal expression of X-linked genes in males and females. Mapping human X-borne genes in distantly related mammals [11] showed that only part of the X chromosome is conserved between the eutherians ("placental" mammals) and marsupials (which diverged from eutherians 180 million years ago). The long arm and pericentric region of the human X is equivalent to the marsupial X and is therefore at least 180 million years old. This region of the human X chromosome is known as the conserved region of the X (XCR). However, genes on the short arm of the human X are autosomal in marsupials, implying the addition of a region to the sex chromosomes between 130 and 80 million years ago. This region of the human X chromosome is known as the recently added region (XAR) and it is exposed to the same forces that shaped the ancient region. These building blocks of the human X chromosome are evident as two major autosomal regions in chickens [12]. The different evolutionary histories of the ancient and added regions of the human X can be exploited to test hypotheses of how and why mental retardation genes came to accumulate on the X chromosome. The presence of the X chromosome as two copies in females, but only a single copy in males may explain the accumulation of certain classes of genes on the X chromosome that confer an advantage to males but are neutral, or even deleterious, in females [13]. Alternative hypotheses to explain the accumulation of MRX genes on the human X may be tested by observing the location and expression of their marsupial orthologues. Mapping will show whether the MRX genes were part of ancient gene blocks, or were recruited to the human X chromosome from autosomes as independent events. If they were part of ancient gene blocks, it would be expected that MRX genes from the conserved region of the human X would also be located on the X chromosome in the tammar wallaby, and that MRX genes from the recently added region of the human X would be found on the short arm of chromosome 5 in the tammar wallaby. If MRX genes were recruited from autosomes to the X chromosome as independent events, their homologues would be likely to be distributed across the genome in the tammar wallaby. Examination of the expression profiles of marsupial orthologues of MRX genes on the conserved and the recently added regions of the human X chromosome will test the whether the function of these genes has changed due to their location on the X. If genes on both the tammar wallaby X chromosome and chromosome 5p have brain-restricted expression patterns like their human counterparts, then this would support the hypothesis that recently added region of the human X chromosome was rich in brain function genes prior to its translocation to the ancient X, and their function was retained after relocation to the X. If genes located on the wallaby X have brain-specific expression like their human counterparts, but genes on the wallaby 5p have a different expression pattern, this supports the hypothesis that the function of these genes has changed in the eutherian lineage upon relocation to the X chromosome. To test this hypothesis we studied a number of MRX genes, and candidate MRX genes involved in brain function distributed along the human X chromosome.

Results

Choice of human genes for this study

We chose genes that are more or less evenly distributed along the human X chromosome and are involved in a number of biological pathways or neuronal processes (Table 1). They include genes such as OPHN1, ARHGEF6 and TSPAN7, which play a role in the formation and dismantling of the actin cytoskeleton to control growth of neurons, and genes such as RSK2, JARID1C and probably RSK4, which play a role in the control of gene expression through modulation of chromatin structure. Other genes are likely to regulate transcription and translation, such as ARX, FMR1 and FMR2, or encode receptor proteins, such as SREB3 and AGTR2. Most of these genes are human MRX genes, specific mutations in which cause mental retardation. Mutations that cause mental retardation have not yet been found in the RSK4 and SREB3 genes, but RSK4 is strong candidate MRX gene because of its similarity to RSK2, a known MRX gene, and SREB3 because of its brain-specific expression pattern. Some of the MRX genes are ubiquitously expressed and mutations within these genes cause cellular defects in many tissues, as well as predominantly affecting the brain because of its higher sensitivity [5]. Regardless of the role these genes play in the brain of eutherian mammals, many are expressed in the brain more strongly than in other tissues, and many have a period during development when expression is restricted to the brain or nervous system (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of the location, function and expression patterns of the human genes in this study.

Locus symbolGene nameHuman locationProposed functionExpression in human and/or mousereference
RSK2 (RPS6KA3)ribosomal S6 kinase 2Xp22.2(XAR)Serine threonine protein kinase that phosphorylates CREB and regulates histone H3 acetyltransferase, to play a role in long term memoryExpressed widely, but only at low levels in foetal and adult tissues; is concentrated in the adult brain, skeletal muscle and heart[24–26]
ARXAristaless-related homeobox geneXp22(XAR)Transcription factor with a role in neuronal proliferation and differentiationRestricted to embryonic brain in human, but also found in mouse testis. Widespread strong expression in the adult heart, skeletal muscle, kidney and liver, no expression in the brain.[27–30]
TSPAN7 (TM4SF2)tetraspanin 7Xp11.4(XAR)Modulates integrin-mediated signalling, to play a role in neurite outgrowth and synapse formationUbiquitous in foetus and adult[31]
SREB3 (GPR173)Super conserved receptor expressed in the brainXp11.22(XCR)G- protein coupled receptor, role in MRX unknownRestricted to brain and ovary with low levels detectable in the small intestine[32, 33]
JARID1C (SMCX)Jumonji AT-rich interactive domain 1CXp11.22(XCR)Role in chromatin remodelling by regulating transcriptionWidely expressed at different levels in different tissues. Strongest in adult brain and skeletal muscle.[34]
OPHN1Oligophrenin 1Xq12(XCR)Negatively regulates Rho-GTPase activity to affect formation and dismantling of the actin cytoskeleton and control of neurite growthUbiquitous in foetus, restricted to central and peripheral neuronal tissues in the adult[35–37]
RSK4 (RPS6KA6)ribosomal S6 kinase 4Xq21(XCR)Serine threonine kinase with very high homology to RSK2, suggesting a role in normal cell proliferation and neuron differentiationWidespread weak expression in adult, concentrated in the adult brain and kidney[24, 38, 39]
AGTR2angiotensin II receptor, type 2Xq22(XCR)Receptor protein with a role in central nervous system or cardiovascular functionHighly expressed in all developing foetal tissues, but adult expression only in brain, adrenal medulla, and atretic ovary[40, 41]
ARHGEF6rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 6Xq26(XCR)activates Rho-GTPase activity to affect formation and dismantling of the actin cytoskeleton and control of neurite growthUbiquitous[35, 42, 43]
FMR1fragile X mental retardation 1 geneXq27.3(XCR)RNA-binding protein with roles in synaptic maturation and function, and in germ cell proliferationWidely expressed in most adult and foetal tissues, highest in brain and the testis[44–46]
FMR2fragile site mental retardation 2 geneXq28(XCR)Nuclear transcriptional regulator with a role in learning and memoryRestricted to placenta and adult brain.[47, 48].
Summary of the location, function and expression patterns of the human genes in this study.

Isolation and mapping of tammar wallaby MRX gene orthologues

To isolate BAC clones containing orthologues of human MRX genes from the tammar wallaby BAC library, homologous human, mouse and Brazilian gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) sequences available from the public databases were compared with the tammar wallaby trace archives to identify highly conserved gene sequences. The availability of tammar wallaby sequences in the trace archive allowed the design of tammar wallaby primer pairs to amplify the RSK4, AGTR2 and ARHGEF6 genes from female tammar wallaby genomic DNA (Table 2). Primer pairs designed from available opossum sequence were used to amplify the RSK2, ARX, OPHN1, and FMR2 genes from female tammar wallaby genomic DNA (Table 2). PCR products of the expected size (Table 2) were cloned and sequenced to verify their identity and were used separately to identify positive BAC clones from the tammar wallaby BAC libraries. To identify BAC clones containing the FMR1 and TSPAN7 gene, 40bp overgos designed from opossum (FMR1) or tammar wallaby (TSPAN7) sequence were used to screen the tammar wallaby BAC library.
Table 2

Summary of primers used for library screening and expression analysis. BAC clone addresses are also given for each BAC clone identified and used in the localisation of the MRX genes.

GenePrimer PairUseSequenceBAC cloneProduct size genomic/cDNAAnneal°C
RSK2MdRSK2 (17)F1MdRSK2 (17)R1MeRSK2 (13)F1MeRSK2 (20)R1BAC isolation expressionF1: 5'-TGAAAGGAGGTGAACTACTGGA-3'R1: 5'-ACCCCTTGTGCATGAAGATA-3'F1: 5'-AGCCTGCAACAGGTAGACCT-3'R1: 5'-TTTGCAGTGTCTGAAACGGA-3'VIA 73C9118 bp1.0 kb5055
ARXMdARX F5MdARX R5BAC isolation/expressionF5: 5'-AGCTCTGAGGCTGAAAGCAA-3'R5: 5'-TTTGATTAGCGATGGTGGTG-3'VIA 37C12150 bp57
TSPAN7MeTSPAN7 OVaMeTSPAN7 OVbMdTM4SF2 F2MdTM4SF2 R2BAC isolation expression5'-TGCCATGTTCTTGTCCCTGGTGTT-3'5'-CACCAGCTCAGCCAAGAACACCAG-3'F2: 5'-GAGCTGCTGTGGTGTTCAGA-3'R2: 5'-CAAACCTTTTGATTGACTTTAGTGG-3'AGI 383N1440 bp150 bpn/a58
SREB3MdSREB3 F2MdSREB3 R2BAC isolation/expressionF2: 5'-CTTGCACAAGGCTCCCTACT-3'R2: 5'-TCATGCGTTTGGCATAGAAG-3'AGI 63D15*270 bp52
JARID1CMeSMCX F1MeSMCX R1BAC isolation/expressionF1: 5'-CGTCTGAGGAGGAGCCATAG-3'R1: 5'-CCTTGAAGGAGTCAGCCATC-3'AGI 63D15*250 bp57
OPHN1MdOPHN1 F2MdOPHN1 R2BAC isolation/expressionF2: 5'-CACAGCCGAGAGAACCTGAT-3'R2: 5'-GGATTTCCACGACGATGTTC-3'AGI 62P8118 bp59
RSK4MeRSK4 F2MeRSK4 R2MeRSK4 (13)F1MeRSK4 (20)R1BAC isolation expressionF2: 5'-CATTCAAACCTGCATCTGGA-3'R2: 5'-TCGCTTGCAAACAGAATAGGF1: 5'-AACCTGCATCTGGAAAACCA-3'R1: 5'-TTTGCTGCATCTGAAACAGT-3'AGI 88I19650 bp1.0 kb6055
FMR1MdFMR1 OVaMdFMR1 OVbMeFMR1 F1MeFMR1 R1BAC isolation expression5'-TGGTGCTAATAATCAGCAAGCTAG-3'5'-GACTCCAGGTACTTTTCTAGCTTG-3'F1: 5'-GACAGCATCACCAATGCAAC-3'R1: 5'-CGCTGACGATTATCTGTTCG-3'AGI 77O1240 bp450 bpn/a59
FMR2MdFMR2 F1MdFMR2 R1MeFMR2 F2MeFMR2 R2BAC isolation expressionF1: 5'-CTGCTAGCCATGTCAACATCA-3'R1: 5'-TCAGTCTGTCTGCCATGTCC-3'F2: 5'-AGAGCCTCCTTCAACCAACA-3'R2: 5'-CCTGTTCTGGGTGTTCCAGT-3'AGI 39E180 bp450 bp5960
AGTR2MeAGTR2 F1MeAGTR2 R1BAC isolation/expressionF1: 5'-TACCAAGCCGTTGTCTACCC-3'R1: 5'-CTGCGGAGCTGAGAAACTCT-3'AGI 91P8600 bp/650 bp59
ARHGEF6MeARHGEF6 F1MeARHGEF6 R1BAC isolation/expressionF1: 5'-TTGGGCAACTTTGAGGAAGT-3'R1: 5'-CATTCACAGCTGAGGGATGA-3'AGI 139J232.0 kb/170 bp57

* Delbridge et al, in preparation.

Summary of primers used for library screening and expression analysis. BAC clone addresses are also given for each BAC clone identified and used in the localisation of the MRX genes. * Delbridge et al, in preparation. To verify that the positive BAC clones identified by library screening contained the correct gene, BAC DNA was isolated, and used as the template for PCR amplification of each gene using the primer pairs used to generate the original PCR fragment for library screening. Tammar wallaby trace sequences were used to design primers to amplify an FMR1 gene fragment from the BAC clones. PCR products generated from the BAC clones were sequenced to verify that the BAC clones contained the correct gene sequence. The TSPAN7 positive BAC was verified by sequencing using the overgos as primers in the sequencing reaction. This allowed the identification of tammar wallaby BAC clones containing sequences homologous to nine MRX genes from the human X chromosome. The possibility that these were intronless retroposed copies was eliminated by the amplification and sequencing of intron-containing PCR products from each BAC clone, demonstrating that the sequence of these products was identical to that of the original probes. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to map the verified BAC clones onto tammar wallaby metaphase chromosome spreads. BAC clones containing the tammar wallaby homologues of human genes located in the conserved region of the human X chromosome (OPHN1, RSK4, AGTR2, ARHGEF6, FMR1 and FMR2) hybridised to the long arm of the tammar wallaby X chromosome (Figure 1). BAC clones containing the tammar wallaby homologues of human genes located in the recently added region of the human X chromosome (RSK2, ARX, and TSPAN7) hybridised to the short arm of tammar wallaby chromosome 5.
Figure 1

Localisation of tammar wallaby MRX homologues. BACs containing tammar wallaby MRX homologues hybridised to male metaphase chromosome spreads. Signals are visualised in green, and chromosomes are counterstained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and visualised in red.

Localisation of tammar wallaby MRX homologues. BACs containing tammar wallaby MRX homologues hybridised to male metaphase chromosome spreads. Signals are visualised in green, and chromosomes are counterstained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and visualised in red. These results imply that these tammar wallaby MRX homologues are part of the previously defined conserved and recently added regions of the human X chromosome, which are represented by the X chromosome and the short arm of chromosome 5 in the tammar wallaby [11]. They are clearly parts of ancient gene blocks, not the result of independent or more recent transposition events to the mammalian X chromosome, which is consistent with what we already know about the evolution of the eutherian X chromosome [14].

Expression of MRX homologues in the tammar wallaby

We examined the expression profiles of all the tammar wallaby orthologues of human MRX and candidate MRX genes. This included XAR genes RSK2, ARX, and TSPAN7 from the short arm of tammar wallaby chromosome 5, and XCR genes OPHN1, RSK4, AGTR2, ARHGEF6, FMR1 and FMR2 from the tammar wallaby X chromosome. Two other genes previously localised to the tammar wallaby X chromosome, SREB3 and JARID1C (Delbridge in preparation), were also included in this analysis. We found that RSK2, TSPAN7, SREB3, JARID1C, OPHN1, ARHGEF6, FMR1, FMR2, RSK4, and AGTR2 transcripts could be amplified by RT-PCR from RNA extracted from all adult tissues tested (Figure 2). For some genes the amount of RT-PCR product varied in different tissues. Tammar wallaby SREB3, RSK2 and AGTR2 were only weakly expressed in the brain and some other tissues (Figure 2). Tammar wallaby OPHN1, FMR2 and SREB3 were expressed at a lower level in muscular tissues such as the heart and the skeletal muscle, whereas RT-PCR products produced by amplifying other genes from the same samples gave bands of similar intensity in all tissues. Despite these differences in the levels of expression the presence of an RT-PCR product in all tissues implies that these genes are widely expressed in tammar wallaby, in contrast to their tissue-specific expression in human and mouse (Table 3).
Figure 2

Expression profiles of tammar wallaby MRX homologues. Ce: cerebellum, Cx: cortex, H: heart, K: kidney, Li: liver, Lu: lung, Ov: ovary, Sk: skeletal muscle, Sp: spleen, T: testis, -ve: negative control. M: 1.0 kb marker (Roche, Australia).

Table 3

Tammar wallaby localisation and expression data compared to human. Ad: adrenal medulla, B: brain, H: heart, K: kidney, Ov: ovary, Pl: placenta, Sk: skeletal muscle, Sp: spleen, Te: testis.

GeneHuman/mouse expressionTammar wallaby locationTammar wallaby expression
RSK2ubiquitous5pubiquitous
ARXembryonic B, Te, adult H, Sk, Li, K5pB, Te, Ov
TSPAN7ubiquitous5pubiquitous
SREB3B, OvXqubiquitous
JARID1CubiquitousXqubiquitous
OPHN1BXqubiquitous
RSK4ubiquitousXqubiquitous
AGTR2B, Ad, OvXqubiquitous
ARHGEF6ubiquitousXqubiquitous
FMR1ubiquitousXqubiquitous
FMR2B, PlXqubiquitous
Expression profiles of tammar wallaby MRX homologues. Ce: cerebellum, Cx: cortex, H: heart, K: kidney, Li: liver, Lu: lung, Ov: ovary, Sk: skeletal muscle, Sp: spleen, T: testis, -ve: negative control. M: 1.0 kb marker (Roche, Australia). Tammar wallaby localisation and expression data compared to human. Ad: adrenal medulla, B: brain, H: heart, K: kidney, Ov: ovary, Pl: placenta, Sk: skeletal muscle, Sp: spleen, Te: testis. In contrast, ARX expression was restricted to the brain (cortex), testis and ovary tissues in the adult tammar wallaby (Figure 2). Two pairs of primers were used to amplify RT-PCR products within exon 5 (Figure 2) and spanning exons 2 to 5 (results not shown), and include most of the coding region of ARX. Both primer pairs amplified only a single product from cortex, testis and ovary tissues from both tammar wallaby adult and pouch young (day 97 after birth), indicating that restricted ARX expression occurs at both stages. Our experiments would not detect the different isoforms of ARX that have been proposed to result from changes in the 3' untranslated region rather than the coding region [15]. The tammar wallaby ARX expression profile more closely reflects the brain and testis specific expression pattern of ARX in human and mouse embryos, rather than the more widespread expression profile observed in human adults. Unlike its expression profile in eutherian mammals, ARX was expressed in the tammar wallaby ovary.

Discussion

Did human MRX genes originate from autosomal sites?

One hypothesis to explain the over-representation of brain-expressed genes on the human X is that brain-specific genes were transferred to the X from autosomal sites. We tested this hypothesis by determining the chromosomal location of the tammar wallaby orthologues of nine X linked human MRX genes. Tammar wallaby orthologues of XCR genes on the long arm of the human X chromosome (OPHN1, RSK4, AGTR2, ARHGEF6, FMR1, and FMR2) were located on the X chromosome in the tammar wallaby. Two other genes (SREB3 and JARID1C) lie close to the centromere of the short arm of the human X. This region is part of the ancient therian X, but its separate location in chickens and fish mean that it represents a separate evolutionary block [16]. Tammar wallaby orthologues of these genes also lie on the tammar wallaby X (Delbridge in preparation). Thus all the MRX genes in the conserved region of the human X were part of the original therian X chromosome. Human RSK2, ARX and TSPAN7 are located on the short arm of the human X chromosome in a region that is autosomal in marsupials, and therefore represents a recent addition to the eutherian X. As expected, tammar wallaby orthologues of these XAR genes were located on the short arm of chromosome 5, mapping among other genes from this region. This confirms that these MRX genes were part of the recently added region that was transferred to the eutherian X chromosome following the divergence of eutherians from marsupials. We conclude, therefore, that these eleven human MRX genes were part of two previously known conserved blocks of genes, the XAR and XCR, which make up the human X chromosome. None were transferred to the human X chromosome from other locations as independent acquisitions, or as different evolutionary blocks. This is also consistent with the available mapping data from another marsupial, the Brazilian short-tailed grey opossum (Monodelphis domestica), in which XCR genes lie on the X and XAR genes on opossum chromosome 4 [17]. In the more distantly related platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), XCR genes lie on chromosome 6 [18], and XAR genes on two smaller chromosomes (Veyrunes, in preparation).

Did human MRX genes originate from genes with more general function?

Given that MRX genes are part of ancient conserved blocks, their over-representation on the X could be due either to an over-representation on the autosomal blocks that evolved into sex chromosomes, or the acquisition of more specialised function by genes with generalised expression. We distinguished between these hypotheses by examining the expression patterns of the MRX genes in the tammar wallaby. The hypothesis that these genes had brain-specific function in the ancestral mammal predicts that their expression will be the same in marsupials as eutherians. The hypothesis that genes with a more general function acquired brain-specific functions predicts that, at least for a few genes, expression patterns in marsupials and eutherians will be different. Moreover, genes more recently recruited to the X (those mapping to tammar wallaby 5p) might show less specialization, and fewer differences. We obtained expression profiles from the homologues of the eleven genes in the tammar wallaby (Figure 2). Ten of these (SREB3, JARID1C, OPHN1, RSK4, AGTR2, ARHGEF6, FMR1, FMR2, RSK2, and TSPAN7) were widely expressed in tammar wallaby; RT-PCR products were detected in most of the tissue samples tested, including the brain (Table 3). Of the human XCR genes, four (JARID1C, RSK4, ARHGEF6 and FMR1) are also widely expressed in humans, so no difference in expression was detected. However, the wide expression of tammar wallaby orthologues of four human XCR genes (SREB3, OPHN1, AGTR2 and FMR2) contrasts with a more restricted expression pattern in human, suggesting that the brain functions, at least of these genes, were recently acquired in the therian lineage. Tammar wallaby orthologues of two human Xp genes lying in the added region (RSK2 and TSPAN7) were also widely expressed, as they are in humans. The wide expression of these MRX genes from the added region of the human X suggests that they acquired a specific function more recently, only in the human brain. The ARX gene in the added region of the human X is particularly interesting because it alone has a restricted expression pattern (cortex of the brain, testis and ovary) in the tammar wallaby. This reflects the restricted expression pattern in eutherian embryos, but differs from the wide expression in adults. Thus, ARX expression is restricted to the developing brain and reproductive tissues in all therian mammals. This pattern of expression appears to have been retained in the adult tammar wallaby, but has been relaxed to include expression in other tissues in adult human and mouse. ARX is therefore an example of a gene that has always played a critical role in development of the therian brain. Since ARX lies on tammar wallaby chromosome 5p, this ancient brain-specific function was not a consequence of its location on the X chromosome. Expression patterns of MRX homologues have not yet been examined in a wide range of tissue types from the platypus or the chicken so we cannot deduce expression patterns of the MRX genes in an ancestral tetrapod. The expression patterns of OPHN1, ARHGEF6 and FMR1 have been examined in detail in the chicken brain [19] and found to be similar in the ancient regions of the mouse and chicken brain such as the cerebellum, but very different in the younger regions of the brain such as the telencephalon. This suggested that at least these three X-borne genes independently evolved specialised functions in the brain following the divergence of birds and mammals [19]. We found that these three genes were expressed widely in adult tammar wallaby tissues, including the brain, but since we did not examine expression in the corresponding different regions of the brain, we cannot tell whether this change in expression occurred before or after the marsupial-eutherian divergence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results are not consistent with the hypothesis that the over-representation on the X chromosome of genes with a function in brain resulted from relocation or copying of brain function genes from autosomes, either independently or as transposed blocks of independent origin. It remains possible that the over-representation of these genes was a property of the ancient autosomal regions that became the sex chromosomes. At least some brain-specific genes on the human X chromosome, such as ARX, already had a brain-specific function when they were located on the autosomal proto-X chromosome. However, we present four examples of the narrowing of the expression patterns of human XCR genes. This suggests that the acquisition of brain-specific function by originally widely expressed genes is responsible for the over-representation of brain-specific genes on the human X chromosome.

Methods

PCR

PCR amplifications were carried out using 15 pmol of each primer (Geneworks, Adelaide, Australia), 2.0 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP (Roche, Sydney, Australia), and 0.625U Taq Polymerase in the recommended buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega, Sydney Australia). Following an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 minutes, cycling conditions were 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds; 50–60°C annealing for 30 seconds; 72°C for 1 minute; with a final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C. Annealing temperatures are listed in Table 2. All PCR products were cloned into the TA TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Australia) for sequencing and verification of their identity. Sequencing was done at the Australian Genomic Research Facility (AGRF), Brisbane, Australia.

BAC libraries

BAC clones were isolated from either a male tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) BAC library (constructed at the Victorian Institute of Animal Sciences, VIA prefix, [20]) or the commercially available female tammar wallaby BAC library (Arizona Genomics Institute, AGI prefix).

Library screening

Gene specific DNA probes generated by PCR (Table 2) were radioactively labelled using 32-P dATP or 32-P dCTP using the Megaprime DNA labelling system (Amersham, Australia). DNA probes were hybridised to BAC filters for 16 hours at 60°C in Church's buffer [21] and washed twice in 2×SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C. DNA probes generated from mouse genomic DNA were hybridised and washed at 50°C. Overgo probes were designed using the Overgo Maker tool available for download through the Washington University Genome Sequencing Centre website, and used to screen the BAC library as previously described [22].

Direct Sequencing

400 ng BAC DNA was used in a sequencing reaction containing 4 μl BigDye Terminator version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems) and 5 pmol primer. Cycling conditions for sequencing reactions were: 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 99 cycles of 96°C for 10 seconds, 50°C for 10 seconds and 60°C for 4 minutes. Reactions were precipitated and sent to AGRF for capillary separation.

RNA isolation

Tissue was collected under The Australian National University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee proposal numbers R.CG.08.03 and R.CG.11.06. RNA was isolated from tissue using the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia).

Reverse transcription

First strand synthesis reactions were carried out using a random hexamer primer in the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Australia). The integrity of the RNA and success of the first strand synthesis reaction was tested by PCR using the Quantum RNA 18S Internal Standards (Ambion). Control PCR amplification of 18S standards was carried out for all RNA samples. An 18S product was amplified from all first strand synthesis reactions (RT+), which confirmed the integrity of the RNA, and the quality of the first strand synthesis reaction. Control 18S products could not be amplified from any RNA samples on which a first strand synthesis reaction had not been performed (RT-), ensuring that there was no genomic DNA contamination of the RNA samples (results not shown). Control reactions were followed by RT-PCR amplification of marsupial MRX genes using gene-specific primers (Table 2).

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation

Male tammar wallaby fibroblast cells were cultured and metaphase chromosome spreads prepared on glass slides as previously described [23]. BAC DNA was labelled by nick translation and hybridised to the chromosome preparations as previously described [17]. Fluorescence was visualised with a Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope fitted with a 100-W mercury lamp and a SPOT RT Monochrome CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, MI, USA). IPLab imaging software (Scanalytics Inc., Fairfax, VA, USA) was used to capture and enhance images. A localisation was confirmed by capture of images of at least 10 metaphase spreads on which a specific localisation could be observed on two X chromatids or at least three chromosome 5 chromatids.

Authors' contributions

RJD and MLD carried out the library screening. DAM and RJD carried out the localisation experiments. DAM carried out the expression analysis. JED localised TSPAN7. MLD participated in the design and coordination of the study, and drafted and revised the manuscript. JAMG contributed to the design of the study, and preparation and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final and revised manuscript.
  46 in total

1.  An evolutionarily conserved G-protein coupled receptor family, SREB, expressed in the central nervous system.

Authors:  M Matsumoto; T Saito; J Takasaki; M Kamohara; T Sugimoto; M Kobayashi; M Tadokoro; S Matsumoto; T Ohishi; K Furuichi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  The mouse Arhgef6 gene: cDNA sequence, expression analysis, and chromosome assignment.

Authors:  K Kutsche; A Gal
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2001

3.  A high density of X-linked genes for general cognitive ability: a run-away process shaping human evolution?

Authors:  U Zechner; M Wilda; H Kehrer-Sawatzki; W Vogel; R Fundele; H Hameister
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Mutations in the human ortholog of Aristaless cause X-linked mental retardation and epilepsy.

Authors:  Petter Strømme; Marie E Mangelsdorf; Marie A Shaw; Karen M Lower; Suzanne M E Lewis; Helene Bruyere; Viggo Lütcherath; Agi K Gedeon; Robyn H Wallace; Ingrid E Scheffer; Gillian Turner; Michael Partington; Suzanna G M Frints; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Grant R Sutherland; John C Mulley; Jozef Gécz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-03-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Mutations in ARHGEF6, encoding a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho GTPases, in patients with X-linked mental retardation.

Authors:  K Kutsche; H Yntema; A Brandt; I Jantke; H G Nothwang; U Orth; M G Boavida; D David; J Chelly; J P Fryns; C Moraine; H H Ropers; B C Hamel; H van Bokhoven; A Gal
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Expression pattern of the Rsk2, Rsk4 and Pdk1 genes during murine embryogenesis.

Authors:  Matthias Kohn; Horst Hameister; Marion Vogel; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.224

7.  X-linked Coffin-Lowry syndrome (CLS, MIM 303600, RPS6KA3 gene, protein product known under various names: pp90(rsk2), RSK2, ISPK, MAPKAP1).

Authors:  Sylvie Jacquot; Maria Zeniou; Renaud Touraine; André Hanauer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Human ARX gene: genomic characterization and expression.

Authors:  R Ohira; Y H Zhang; W Guo; K Dipple; S L Shih; J Doerr; B L Huang; L J Fu; A Abu-Khalil; D Geschwind; E R B McCabe
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.797

9.  AGTR2 mutations in X-linked mental retardation.

Authors:  Virginie S Vervoort; Michael A Beachem; Penny S Edwards; Sydney Ladd; Karin E Miller; Xavier de Mollerat; Katie Clarkson; Barbara DuPont; Charles E Schwartz; Roger E Stevenson; Ellen Boyd; Anand K Srivastava
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Expression analysis of RSK gene family members: the RSK2 gene, mutated in Coffin-Lowry syndrome, is prominently expressed in brain structures essential for cognitive function and learning.

Authors:  Maria Zeniou; Thomas Ding; Elisabeth Trivier; André Hanauer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Are some chromosomes particularly good at sex? Insights from amniotes.

Authors:  Denis O'Meally; Tariq Ezaz; Arthur Georges; Stephen D Sarre; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Physical map of two tammar wallaby chromosomes: a strategy for mapping in non-model mammals.

Authors:  Janine E Deakin; Edda Koina; Paul D Waters; Ruth Doherty; Vidushi S Patel; Margaret L Delbridge; Bianca Dobson; James Fong; Yanqiu Hu; Cecilia van den Hurk; Andrew J Pask; Geoff Shaw; Carly Smith; Katherine Thompson; Matthew J Wakefield; Hongshi Yu; Marilyn B Renfree; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  A computational approach to candidate gene prioritization for X-linked mental retardation using annotation-based binary filtering and motif-based linear discriminatory analysis.

Authors:  Zané Lombard; Chungoo Park; Kateryna D Makova; Michèle Ramsay
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Evolutionary genomics of human intellectual disability.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi; Kyle Summers; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  A New Role for LOC101928437 in Non-Syndromic Intellectual Disability: Findings from a Family-Based Association Test.

Authors:  Shaohe Zhou; Zhangyan Shi; Meng Cui; Junlin Li; Zhe Ma; Yuanyu Shi; Zijian Zheng; Fuchang Zhang; Tianbo Jin; Tingting Geng; Chao Chen; Yale Guo; Jianping Zhou; Shaoping Huang; Xingli Guo; Lin Gao; Pingyuan Gong; Xiaocai Gao; Kejin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development and validation of a multiplex-PCR assay for X-linked intellectual disability.

Authors:  Paula Jorge; Bárbara Oliveira; Isabel Marques; Rosário Santos
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.103

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.