Literature DB >> 18247068

Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish.

Christian Agrillo1, Marco Dadda, Giovanna Serena, Angelo Bisazza.   

Abstract

The spontaneous tendency to join the largest social group was used to investigate quantity discrimination in fish. Fish discriminated between shoals that differed by one element when the paired numbers were 1vs2, 2vs3 and 3vs4, but not when 4vs5 or larger. Using large numerosities (>4), the ability to discriminate between two numbers improved as the numerical distance between them increased and a significant discrimination was found only with ratios of 1:2 or smaller (4vs8, 8vs16 and 4vs10). Experiments to control for non-numerical variables evidenced the role played by the total area of stimuli with both large and small numerosities; the total quantity of movement of the fish within a shoal appeared also important but only when large numerosities were involved. Even though the pattern of discrimination exhibited by female mosquitofish is not fully consistent with any of the existing models of quantity representation, our results seem to suggest two distinct mechanisms in fish, one used to compare small numbers of objects and one used when larger numerosities are involved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247068     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0140-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  62 in total

1.  When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily H Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Rational choice of social group size in mosquitofish.

Authors:  Luke Reding; Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Weber's Law-based perception and the stability of animal groups.

Authors:  Andrea Perna; Giulio Facchini; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices.

Authors:  Matthew G Salena; Andy J Turko; Angad Singh; Avani Pathak; Emily Hughes; Culum Brown; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  More evidence that less is better: Sub-optimal choice in dogs.

Authors:  Rebecca J Chase; David N George
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?

Authors:  Emily Szkudlarek; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Authors:  Devina Wadhera; Lynn M Wilkie; Elizabeth D Capaldi-Phillips
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination.

Authors:  Melissa E Libertus; Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-23

9.  Ontogeny of numerical abilities in fish.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Laura Piffer; Giovanna Serena; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual nesting of stimuli affects rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) quantity judgments in a bisection task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.