Literature DB >> 18246018

Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

Francisco M Kovacs1, Víctor Abraira, Ana Royuela, Josep Corcoll, Luis Alegre, Alejandra Cano, Alfonso Muriel, Javier Zamora, María Teresa Gil del Real, Mario Gestoso, Nicole Mufraggi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) on the pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) in subacute and chronic patients with low back pain (LBP), with and without referred pain to the leg (LP), seen in the routine clinical practice of the Spanish National Health Service. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MCIC have been explored in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European LBP patients. No data on the influence of LP on MCIC are available. In Southern European patients, determinants of disability have shown to be different, and MCIC for pain and disability are unknown.
METHODS: Data from the postmarketing surveillance of 1349 LBP subacute and chronic patients treated in routine clinical practice were used for this study. Three different methods were used to estimate the MCIC over a 12-week period: the mean change score (MCS), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the optimal cutoff point in receiver operant curves (OCP). Patients' own "global perceived effect" was used as the external criterion. The effect on MCIC of initial scores, duration of pain, and existence of LP were assessed.
RESULTS: Different methods led to different MCIC values, with those deriving from OCP being the smallest. Depending on the methods which were used, the MCIC for LBP ranged from 1.5 to 3.2 PI-NRS points in patients with a baseline score below 7 points, and from 2.5 to 4.3 in patients with a baseline score >or=9 points. The MCIC for disability ranged from 2.5 to 6.8 RMQ points in those with baseline scores below 10 points, and from 5.5 to 13.8 in those baseline scores >or=15 points. These values were similar for patients with LP, and were not influenced by the duration of pain.
CONCLUSION: In subacute and chronic patients, improvements in LBP of <or=1.5 PI-NRS points, or in disability of <or=2.5 RMQ points should be seen as irrelevant. In those patients, MCIC range values are similar in patients with LP, are consistent across different cultural settings and remain stable no matter what the duration of pain is.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18246018     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  A cognitive-behavioral plus exercise intervention for older adults with chronic back pain: race/ethnicity effect?

Authors:  Katherine Beissner; Samantha J Parker; Charles R Henderson; Anusmiriti Pal; Lynne Iannone; M Cary Reid
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  A Mind-Body Program for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Natalia E Morone; Carol M Greco; Charity G Moore; Bruce L Rollman; Bridget Lane; Lisa A Morrow; Nancy W Glynn; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Susan Armijo-Olivo; Laurent Pitance; Vandana Singh; Francisco Neto; Norman Thie; Ambra Michelotti
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-08-20

5.  The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score.

Authors:  Anestis Iossifidis; Edward F Ibrahim; Charalambos Petrou; Antonis Galanos
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2015-09-23

6.  Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Clinically meaningful measurement of pain in children with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Matthew P Myrvik; Amanda M Brandow; Amy L Drendel; Ke Yan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Julie A Panepinto
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Sandra Eldridge; Ranjit Lall; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Study protocol of effectiveness of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Teresa Rodriguez-Blanco; Isabel Fernández-San-Martin; Montserrat Balagué-Corbella; Anna Berenguera; Jenny Moix; Elena Montiel-Morillo; Esther Núñez-Juárez; Maria J González-Moneo; Magda Pie-Oncins; Raquel Martín-Peñacoba; Mercè Roura-Olivan; Montse Núñez-Juárez; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Authors:  Ruud Groeneweg; Hans Kropman; Huco Leopold; Luite van Assen; Jan Mulder; Maurits W van Tulder; Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.