Literature DB >> 27582986

The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score.

Anestis Iossifidis1, Edward F Ibrahim1, Charalambos Petrou1, Antonis Galanos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to validate the Functional Shoulder Score (FSS), a new patient-reported outcome score specifically designed to evaluate patients with rotator cuff disorders.
METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients were assessed using two shoulder scoring systems [the FSS and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS)] at 3 weeks pre- and 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. The reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability of the FSS were evaluated.
RESULTS: Reliability analysis (test-retest) showed an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92 to 0.98]. Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93. The Pearson correlation coefficient FSS-CMS was 0.782 pre-operatively and 0.737 postoperatively (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant increase in FSS scores postoperatively, an effect size of 3.06 and standardized response mean of 2.80. The value for minimal detectable change was ±8.38 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal clinically important difference for improvement was 24.7 ± 5.4 points.
CONCLUSIONS: The FSS is a patient-reported outcome measure that can easily be incorporated into clinical practice, providing a quick, reliable, valid and practical measure for rotator cuff problems. The questionnaire is highly sensitive to clinical change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMs; reliability; rotator cuff disorders; shoulder questionnaires; validity

Year:  2015        PMID: 27582986      PMCID: PMC4935126          DOI: 10.1177/1758573215578589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  56 in total

1.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Alia Menezes; Lois Horovitz; Edward C Jones; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Géza Pap; Anne F Mannion; Daniel B Herren; André Aeschlimann; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10-15

Review 3.  Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

Authors:  Felix Angst; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; André Aeschlimann; Beat R Simmen; Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 4.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J M Binkley; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1996-10

Review 5.  Shoulder outcomes measures.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Keith M Baumgarten
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors:  J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1999-04

Review 7.  Scoring systems for the functional assessment of patients with rotator cuff pathology.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sebastiano Vasta; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Brian G Leggin; Lori A Michener; Michael A Shaffer; Susan K Brenneman; Joseph P Iannotti; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Anthony A Romeo; Augustus Mazzocca; David W Hang; Susan Shott; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Andrea Bean; Varda van Osnabrugge; Joy C MacDermid; Richard Holtby
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dominique I Dabija; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Zhang; Gavinn Niroopan; Chetan Gohal; Bashar Alolabi; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-04-19

Review 3.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.