Literature DB >> 18243497

One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients.

Guido Barbagli1, Giorgio Guazzoni, Massimo Lazzeri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome of bulbar urethroplasty using one-stage surgical techniques.
METHODS: Of 375 patients, who underwent one-stage bulbar urethroplasties, 165 patients (44%) underwent anastomotic repair (AR), 40 (10.7%) underwent augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) using penile skin grafts (PSGs) or oral mucosal grafts (OMGs), and 170 (45.3%) underwent onlay grafting techniques (OGTs) using PSGs or OMGs. Clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. The chi2 and Fisher's exact test for categorical data were used. The sample size of 375 patients provides a statistical power (1-beta) of 99% at alpha=0.05; p<0.05 was set as significant.
RESULTS: The average follow-up was 53 mo. Of 375 cases, 313 (83.5%) were successful and 62 (16.5%) failures. Of 165 ARs, 150 (90.9%) were successful and 15 (9.1%) failures. Of 40 AARs, 24 (60%) were successful and 16 (40%) failures. Of 170 OGTs, 139 (81.8%) were successful and 31 (18.2%) failures. The AR showed statistically significant higher success rate compared to OGT (p=0.023) and AAR (p=0.0001). Of 47 PSGs, 28 (59.6%) were successful and 19 (40.4%) failures. Of 163 OMGs, 135 (82.8%) were successful and 28 (17.2%) failures. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: One-stage bulbar urethroplasties showed an overall 83.5% success rate. The AR showed the higher success rate compared to the OGT or AAR. OMGs (82.8% success rate) perform statistically better than PSGs (59.6% success rate).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243497     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  36 in total

1.  The use of uroflowmetry to diagnose recurrent stricture after urethral reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Bradley A Erickson; Benjamin N Breyer; Jack W McAninch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  [Management of urethral strictures].

Authors:  C Gozzi; S Tritschler; P J Bastian; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Urethral reconstruction using autologous vein grafts for the management of urethral strictures.

Authors:  Bum Soo Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Urethral stricture : From diagnostics to appropriate treatment].

Authors:  F Strittmatter; V Beck; C G Stief; S Tritschler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments.

Authors:  Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Claudius Füllhase; Christian G Stief; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa transplants].

Authors:  O Engel; S Ahyai; M Rink; C Eichelberg; R Dahlem; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Management of urethral strictures: practical guidelines].

Authors:  S Tritschler; C Füllhase; C Stief; A Roosen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Graft surgery in extensive urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  The effect of urethral transection on erectile function after anterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor Haines; Keith F Rourke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Buccal mucosa urethroplasty: a 10-year retrospective review of maxillofacial and urological outcomes.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; I M Cullen; C Murphy; H Flood; G J Kearns
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.