BACKGROUND: Cryoablation is increasingly used to treat atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). It is unknown whether larger electrode-tip cryocatheters improve outcomes without compromising safety. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare acute and long-term success with 4-mm versus 6-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters for AVNRT. METHODS: We conducted a 2-group cohort study on 289 patients, age 45.5 +/- 15.9 years (76.8% female), who underwent transcatheter cryoablation as a first-time procedure for AVNRT with 4-mm (N = 152) or 6-mm (N = 137) electrode-tip catheters. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 90.7% (95% confidence interval 86.9% to 93.7%) with no difference between the 2 electrode-tip sizes. A shorter fluoroscopy time (16.1 +/- 11.3 versus 20.3 +/- 14.9 minutes, P = .0096) and trend toward briefer procedural duration (166.6 +/- 49.1 versus 173.5 +/- 53.0 minutes, P = NS) were noted with 6-mm electrode tips. Transient AV block occurred in 5.2%, with complete recovery in 4.4 +/- 2.6 seconds. Over a median follow-up of 155 days, recurrences were less common with 6-mm electrode tips. Actuarial event-free survival rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months with 6-mm versus 4-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters were 96.7%, 93.4%, 91.9%, and 88.5% versus 89.9%, 87.0%, 84.1%, and 77.1%, respectively, with no recurrence thereafter (P = .0457). In multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline imbalances and medical therapy postablation, cryoablation with a 4-mm-tip catheter incurred a 2.5-fold increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.1, P = .0420). CONCLUSION: In patients with AVNRT, cryoablation with 6-mm electrode-tip catheters is safe and is associated with fewer recurrences on long-term follow-up compared with 4-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters.
BACKGROUND: Cryoablation is increasingly used to treat atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). It is unknown whether larger electrode-tip cryocatheters improve outcomes without compromising safety. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare acute and long-term success with 4-mm versus 6-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters for AVNRT. METHODS: We conducted a 2-group cohort study on 289 patients, age 45.5 +/- 15.9 years (76.8% female), who underwent transcatheter cryoablation as a first-time procedure for AVNRT with 4-mm (N = 152) or 6-mm (N = 137) electrode-tip catheters. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 90.7% (95% confidence interval 86.9% to 93.7%) with no difference between the 2 electrode-tip sizes. A shorter fluoroscopy time (16.1 +/- 11.3 versus 20.3 +/- 14.9 minutes, P = .0096) and trend toward briefer procedural duration (166.6 +/- 49.1 versus 173.5 +/- 53.0 minutes, P = NS) were noted with 6-mm electrode tips. Transient AV block occurred in 5.2%, with complete recovery in 4.4 +/- 2.6 seconds. Over a median follow-up of 155 days, recurrences were less common with 6-mm electrode tips. Actuarial event-free survival rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months with 6-mm versus 4-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters were 96.7%, 93.4%, 91.9%, and 88.5% versus 89.9%, 87.0%, 84.1%, and 77.1%, respectively, with no recurrence thereafter (P = .0457). In multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline imbalances and medical therapy postablation, cryoablation with a 4-mm-tip catheter incurred a 2.5-fold increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.1, P = .0420). CONCLUSION: In patients with AVNRT, cryoablation with 6-mm electrode-tip catheters is safe and is associated with fewer recurrences on long-term follow-up compared with 4-mm electrode-tip cryocatheters.
Authors: Srikant Das; Ian H Law; Nicholas H Von Bergen; David J Bradley; Macdonald Dick; Susan P Etheridge; Elizabeth V Saarel; Patricio A Frias; Margaret J Strieper; Peter S Fischbach Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Nikhil K Chanani; Nancy A Chiesa; Anne M Dubin; Kishor Avasarala; George F Van Hare; Kathryn K Collins Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 1.976