| Literature DB >> 19846431 |
Felipe Atienza1, Jesús Almendral, Damián Sánchez-Quintana, Matilde Zaballos, Margarita Murillo, Concepción Jimeno, Verónica Parra, Francisco Fernández-Avilés.
Abstract
AIMS: To establish a temporal safety window for cryoablation at minimal temperatures and to assess the electrophysiological and histological changes as a function of the application duration. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19846431 PMCID: PMC2770697 DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214
Univariate predictors of acute atrioventricular nodal conduction recovery and persistent atrioventricular block at 1 week
| Acute AV nodal conduction recovery | Persistent AVB at 1 week | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes ( | No ( | No ( | Yes ( | |||
| Number of applications | 6 (11) | 3 (3) | 0.131 | 3.5 (10) | 3 (6) | 0.635 |
| Time to effect | 40 (32) | 19 (18) | 0.016 | 34.5 (31) | 19 (24.3) | 0.031 |
| Time to cryoablation temperature | 21.55 ± 5.14 | 23 ± 4.27 | 0.507 | 21.83 ± 5.32 | 22.75 ± 3.88 | 0.662 |
| Critical cryoablation application duration | 13 (18) | 49 (42.5) | 0.003 | 14 (17.75) | 48 (33.25) | 0.010 |
| Temperature at AVB | −80 (0) | −80 (13) | 0.045 | −80 (0) | −78.5 (14) | 0.037 |
| Nadir temperature | −83 (5) | −82 (3.5) | 0.614 | −82.5 (4.5) | −82 (4.25) | 0.694 |
| Lesion depth | 2.95 (0.7) | 3 (1.85) | 0.682 | 2.9 (0.5) | 3.3 (2.35) | 0.281 |
| Lesion area | 16.05 ± 7.67 | 14.7 ± 8.56 | 0.724 | 14.94 ± 6.85 | 16.06 ± 9.63 | 0.768 |
| Lesion volume | 39.45 ± 22.67 | 40.91 ± 24.63 | 0.894 | 40.38 ± 23.15 | 40 ± 24.56 | 0.973 |
Mean ± SD; median (interquartile range).
Atrioventricular nodal conduction characteristics before and following cryoablation in animals with atrioventricular conduction recovery
| Baseline | Acute ( | 1 Week ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AH interval | 81.1 ± 8.2 | 91.1 ± 12.7 | 0.04 | 93.6 ± 11.2 | 0.04 |
| HV interval | 32.2 ± 5.6 | 32.8 ± 6.8 | ns | 32.3 ± 6.5 | ns |
| Wenckebach cycle | 271.1 ± 38.9 | 268.9 ± 50.8 | ns | 250.9 ± 43.5 | ns |
| AVN refractory period 600 | 277.8 ± 32.3 | 297.8 ± 33.1 | ns | 283.6 ± 38.3 | ns |
| AVN refractory period 400 | 245 ± 30.1 | 223.7 ± 93.5 | ns | 251 ± 28.1 | ns |
aBaseline vs. acute.
bBaseline vs. 1 week.
Cryolesions morphometric analysis at light microscopy in experiments (#) with atrioventricular block after a single cryoapplication
| Experiment # | Randomized group assignment | Critical application duration (s) | AVN conduction after ablation | Myocyte diameter (µm) | CTD/field (%) | Myolysis AV node/field (%) | Myolysis His bundle/field(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | NA | NA | NA | 7.5 ± 1.2 (5–9) | 20 ± 4 (24–35) | 8 ± 2 (5–12) | 7 ± 3 (3–12) |
| #7 | Group 1 | 1 | Acute AV conduction recovery | 12 ± 2 (7–18) | 35 ± 4 (28–45) | 21 ± 4 (16–29) | 25 ± 4 (18–35) |
| #6 | Group 2 | 15 | Acute AV conduction recovery | 13 ± 2 (8–18) | 30±4 (23–46) | 25 ± 4 (19–33) | 22 ± 3 (18–40) |
| #17 | Group 3 | 23 | Delayed AV conduction recovery | 15 ± 2 (9–20) | 40 ± 4 (33–50) | 35 ± 7 (25–48) | 32 ± 4 (26–43) |
| #3 | Group 3 | 20 | Persistent AVB | 15 ± 2 (10–22) | 58 ± 4 (48–75) | 65 ± 5 (55–85) | 68 ± 5 (55–95) |
| #19 | Group 5 | 60 | Persistent AVB | 17 ± 2 (9–24) | 62 ± 4 (50–80) | 60 ± 5 (55–85) | 66 ± 5 (55–98) |
| #22 | Group 5 | 60 | Persistent AVB | 16 ± 2 (9–20) | 65 ± 5 (50–83) | 77 ± 5 (65–98) | 85 ± 5 (72–98) |
Mean ± SD (range). AVB, atrioventricular block; CTD, connective tissue density; NA, not applicable.