Literature DB >> 28374333

How to Approach Difficult Cases of AVNRT.

Darpan S Kumar1, Thomas A Dewland1, Seshadri Balaji1, Charles A Henrikson2.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Our approach to the ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT), the most common supraventricular tachycardia, is as follows: We first attempt ablation in the right atrial posteroseptum anterior to the coronary sinus ostium with a 4-mm non-irrigated tip catheter. If ablation within the triangle of Koch is unsuccessful with radiofrequency (RF), we switch to cryoablation and target a more superior (mid septal) region. We also utilize cryoablation if RF ablation produces transient VA block (absence of retrograde conduction during junctional rhythm) or a fast junctional rhythm (<350 msec). If cryoablation were to fail, or is not available, we would then suggest ablation within the coronary sinus targeting the roof (2-4 cm from the os) using a 3.5-mm irrigated tip catheter. If tachycardia were still inducible despite these measures, we would then proceed with transseptal puncture (given our greater experience with this over a retrograde aortic approach) and perform RF ablation along the posteroseptal left atrium and inferoseptal mitral annulus utilizing an irrigated tip catheter. In our experience, cryoablation reliably results in elimination of the slow pathway. The only left atrial ablation for AVNRT at our institution in the past year was performed because a patent foramen ovale allowed for rapid left atrial access, facilitating left atrial ablation of the slow pathway.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVNRT; Cryoablation; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; Slow pathway

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374333     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-017-0531-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  42 in total

1.  Safety of slow pathway ablation in patients with long PR interval: further evidence of fast and slow pathway interaction.

Authors:  A Natale; R A Greenfield; M J Geiger; K H Newby; V Kent; J M Wharton; M M Kearney; M J Brandon; L Zimerman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Richard L Page; José A Joglar; Mary A Caldwell; Hugh Calkins; Jamie B Conti; Barbara J Deal; N A Mark Estes; Michael E Field; Zachary D Goldberger; Stephen C Hammill; Julia H Indik; Bruce D Lindsay; Brian Olshansky; Andrea M Russo; Win-Kuang Shen; Cynthia M Tracy; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Comparison of cryothermia and radiofrequency current in safety and efficacy of catheter ablation within the canine coronary sinus close to the left circumflex coronary artery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Aoyama; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Jan V Pitha; George S Khammar; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Kagari Matsudaira; Tetsuo Yagi; Katsuaki Yokoyama; Ralph Lazzara; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11

4.  Cryothermal ablation of the slow pathway for the elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  A C Skanes; M Dubuc; G J Klein; B Thibault; A D Krahn; R Yee; D Roy; P Guerra; M Talajic
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  [Electrophysiological effects and clinical efficacy of flecainide in childhood patients with supraventricular reciprocating paroxysmal tachycardia].

Authors:  B Musto; A D'Onofrio; C Cavallaro; A Musto; O Della Gatta; F Marsico
Journal:  G Ital Cardiol       Date:  1987-05

6.  Risk of development of delayed atrioventricular block after slow pathway modification in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a pre-existing prolonged PR interval.

Authors:  Y G Li; G Grönefeld; B Bender; C Machura; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia: fast junctional tachycardia predicts adverse prognosis.

Authors:  K J Lipscomb; A M Zaidi; A P Fitzpatrick; D Lefroy
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Pasquale Santangeli; Riccardo Proietti; Luigi Di Biase; Rong Bai; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  J H Jentzer; R Goyal; B D Williamson; K C Man; M Niebauer; E Daoud; S A Strickberger; J D Hummel; F Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; Theodoros Zografos; George D Katritsis; Eleftherios Giazitzoglou; Vasilios Vachliotis; George Paxinos; A John Camm; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.