Literature DB >> 18240149

Long-term follow-up of cervical abnormalities among women screened by HPV testing and cytology-Results from the Hammersmith study.

Jack Cuzick1, Anne Szarewski, David Mesher, Louise Cadman, Janet Austin, Karen Perryman, Linda Ho, George Terry, Peter Sasieni, Roberto Dina, William P Soutter.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown that HPV testing is substantially more sensitive than cytology for primary cervical screening. However, less data exist concerning the duration of protection afforded by a negative HPV test compared to a normal cytological outcome. Here we report the long-term findings from the Hammersmith study in women aged 35 or more. HPV testing by Hybrid Capture II was performed on all available samples from the baseline screening visit. Passive surveillance of subsequent cytology screening results for the 2,982 women in the study was undertaken using a national registry. Histological outcomes were sought for all women with abnormal smears. The primary outcome was duration of protection against histologically confirmed CIN2+ afforded by a negative HPV test compared to normal cytology. 2,516 women had at least one further smear at least 1 year after entry and 20 new cases of CIN2+ were identified during a median follow-up of 6.4 years. Including disease identified at baseline, the risk of developing CIN2+ at 1, 5 and 9 years after a normal cytology was 0.33%, 0.83% and 2.20% respectively whereas it was 0.19%, 0.42% and 1.88% after a negative HPV test. HPV testing offered excellent protection from CIN2+ for at least 6 years after a negative test, whereas the protection from cytology began to wane after about 3 years. Substantially more CIN2+ lesions were found in the follow-up period in those initially HPV positive compared to those HPV negative (HR = 6.52, p = 0.001), whereas there was little difference according to initial cytology (HR = 1.64, p = 0.51). (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18240149     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  21 in total

1.  What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.

Authors:  Mbathio Dieng; Lyndal Trevena; Robin M Turner; Monika Wadolowski; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Physical state and viral load as predictive biomarkersfor persistence and progression of HPV16-positive cervical lesions: results from a population based long-term prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Manawapat; Frank Stubenrauch; Rainer Russ; Christian Munk; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Early cervical neoplasia: advances in screening and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Tierney; Shannon N Westin; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-08

4.  A long-term prospective study of type-specific human papillomavirus infection and risk of cervical neoplasia among 20,000 women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Andrew G Glass; Nicolas Wentzensen; Brenda B Rush; Philip E Castle; David R Scott; Julie Buckland; Mark E Sherman; Greg Rydzak; Peter Kirk; Attila T Lorincz; Sholom Wacholder; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) E6/E7 mRNA testing by PreTect HPV-Proofer for detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer among hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology.

Authors:  D C Rijkaart; D A M Heideman; V M H Coupe; A A T P Brink; R H M Verheijen; H Skomedal; F Karlsen; E Morland; P J F Snijders; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

7.  Long-term follow-up of cervical disease in women screened by cytology and HPV testing: results from the HART study.

Authors:  D Mesher; A Szarewski; L Cadman; H Cubie; H Kitchener; D Luesley; U Menon; G Hulman; M Desai; L Ho; G Terry; A Williams; P Sasieni; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  HPV-FASTER: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Claudia Robles; Mireia Díaz; Marc Arbyn; Iacopo Baussano; Christine Clavel; Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; Matti Lehtinen; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Mario Poljak; Susanne K Kjaer; Chris J L M Meijer; Suzanne M Garland; Jorge Salmerón; Xavier Castellsagué; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Cervical cancer screening of HPV vaccinated populations: Cytology, molecular testing, both or none.

Authors:  Mariam El-Zein; Lyndsay Richardson; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Predicted impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus 16/18 on cancer incidence and cervical abnormalities in women aged 20-29 in the UK.

Authors:  J Cuzick; A Castañón; P Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.