Literature DB >> 21726363

What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.

Mbathio Dieng1, Lyndal Trevena, Robin M Turner, Monika Wadolowski, Kirsten McCaffery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New testing technologies and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have recently brought changes to cervical cancer screening. In 2006, the Australian government also changed the protocol for managing abnormal Pap smears. Australian women's attitudes and preferences to these changes are largely unknown. Quantitative data on information needs and community attitudes to informed decision making in screening in Australia are also limited.
OBJECTIVE: This national study measures women's preferences for testing and management of abnormal screening results, preferred decision-making styles and information needs for cervical cancer screening.
DESIGN: A randomly selected sample of Australian women aged 18-70 participated in a structured telephone questionnaire, exploring testing preferences, information and decision-making needs.
RESULTS: A total of 1279, of 1571 eligible women, participated in the study with an overall response rate of 81.4%. Half of the women (n = 637) preferred having their Pap smears at least annually, and 85% wanted concurrent HPV testing. A large proportion of women preferred to be involved in decision making for both routine Pap smears (87%) and follow-up for abnormal results (89%). The majority of women wanted information on screening risks (70%) and benefits (77%); of these 81 (85%) wanted this information before screening. However, 63% of women only wanted information about follow-up examinations if they had an abnormal Pap test result.
CONCLUSION: Australian women want to be involved in decision making for cervical cancer screening and require information on the risks and benefits of Pap testing prior to undergoing any screening.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726363      PMCID: PMC5060652          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00707.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  27 in total

1.  Prevalence of South Australia's online health seekers.

Authors:  Tracey L Bessell; Chris A Silagy; Jeremy N Anderson; Janet E Hiller; Lloyd N Sansom
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.939

2.  Communicating about screening.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Stacy M Carter; Lyndal Trevena; Kathy Flitcroft; Les Irwig; Kirsten McCaffery; Glenn Salkeld
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-22

3.  Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Les Irwig; Robin Turner; Siew Foong Chan; Petra Macaskill; Mary Lewicka; Judith Clarke; Edith Weisberg; Alex Barratt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-23

4.  Cervical screening result communication: a focus-group investigation of English women's experiences and needs.

Authors:  M R Goldsmith; J Austoker; G Marsh; S T Kehoe; C R Bankhead
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-10

5.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Decisions about Pap tests: what influences women and providers?

Authors:  Denzil G Fiebig; Marion Haas; Ishrat Hossain; Deborah J Street; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Human papillomavirus infections and risks of cervical cancer: what do women know?

Authors:  Marian Pitts; Tracy Clarke
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2002-12

8.  Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Esther Maissi; Theresa M Marteau; Matthew Hankins; Sue Moss; Rosa Legood; Alastair Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

9.  Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors.

Authors:  N M Gray; L Sharp; S C Cotton; L F Masson; J Little; L G Walker; M Avis; Z Philips; I Russell; D Whynes; M Cruickshank; C M Woolley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study.

Authors:  Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-13
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing cancer care through mobile health.

Authors:  Bassel Odeh; Reem Kayyali; Shereen Nabhani-Gebara; Nada Philip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Editorial.

Authors:  Jonathan Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Experience and knowledge of pain management in patients receiving outpatient cancer treatment: what do older adults really know about their cancer pain?

Authors:  Tamara A Baker; Melissa L O'Connor; Jessica L Krok
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Influences of patient sociodemographics on cancer information received through the first 9 months of treatment.

Authors:  Anthony Molisani; Levent Dumenci; Robin K Matsuyama
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Women diagnosed with HIV and unknown HIV status perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer and perceived benefits of cervical cancer screening in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nancy Innocentia Ebu Enyan; Selorm Akaba; Sarah Ama Amoo
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Trends in Local Therapy Utilization and Cost for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Implications for Payment and Policy Reform.

Authors:  Shervin M Shirvani; Jing Jiang; Anna Likhacheva; Karen E Hoffman; Simona F Shaitelman; Abigail Caudle; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  'It has saved thousands of lives, so why change it?' Content analysis of objections to cervical screening programme changes in Australia.

Authors:  Helena M Obermair; Rachael H Dodd; Carissa Bonner; Jesse Jansen; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rachael H Dodd; Olivia A Mac; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  "If you can't treat HPV, why test for it?" Women's attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study.

Authors:  Judith McRae; Cara Martin; John O'Leary; Linda Sharp
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Decision making about Pap test use among Korean immigrant women: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Soohyun Kim; Joseph J Gallo; Marie T Nolan; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.