Literature DB >> 18238801

Soil water deficits decrease the internal conductance to CO2 transfer but atmospheric water deficits do not.

C R Warren1.   

Abstract

The internal conductance to CO2 supply from substomatal cavities to sites of carboxylation poses a large limitation to photosynthesis. It is known that internal conductance is decreased by soil water deficits, but it is not known if it is affected by atmospheric water deficits (i.e. leaf to air vapour pressure deficit, VPD). The aim of this paper was to examine the responses of internal conductance to atmospheric and soil water deficits in seedlings of the evergreen perennial Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell and the herbaceous plants Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum) Mill. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Internal conductance was estimated with the variable J method from concurrent measurements of gas exchange and fluorescence. In all three species steady-state stomatal conductance decreased by approximately 30% as VPD increased from 1 kPa to 2 kPa. In no species was internal conductance affected by VPD despite large effects on stomatal conductance. In contrast, soil water deficits decreased stomatal conductance and internal conductance of all three species. Decreases in stomatal and internal conductance under water deficit were proportional, but this proportionality differed among species, and thus the relationship between stomatal and internal conductance differed among species. These findings indicate that soil water deficits affect internal conductance while atmospheric water deficits do not. The reasons for this distinction are unknown but are consistent with soil and atmospheric water deficits having differing effects on leaf physiology and/or root-shoot communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18238801     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  21 in total

1.  The role of mesophyll conductance in the economics of nitrogen and water use in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley; Charles R Warren
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Diffusional conductances to CO2 as a target for increasing photosynthesis and photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

Authors:  Jaume Flexas; Ulo Niinemets; Alexander Gallé; Margaret M Barbour; Mauro Centritto; Antonio Diaz-Espejo; Cyril Douthe; Jeroni Galmés; Miquel Ribas-Carbo; Pedro L Rodriguez; Francesc Rosselló; Raju Soolanayakanahally; Magdalena Tomas; Ian J Wright; Graham D Farquhar; Hipólito Medrano
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The mechanistic basis of internal conductance: a theoretical analysis of mesophyll cell photosynthesis and CO2 diffusion.

Authors:  Danny Tholen; Xin-Guang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Variable Mesophyll Conductance among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff between Photosynthesis and Water-Use-Efficiency.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tomeo; David M Rosenthal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A three-dimensional multiscale model for gas exchange in fruit.

Authors:  Quang Tri Ho; Pieter Verboven; Bert E Verlinden; Els Herremans; Martine Wevers; Jan Carmeliet; Bart M Nicolaï
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Two-Source δ18O Method to Validate the CO18O-Photosynthetic Discrimination Model: Implications for Mesophyll Conductance.

Authors:  Meisha Holloway-Phillips; Lucas A Cernusak; Hilary Stuart-Williams; Nerea Ubierna; Graham D Farquhar
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction.

Authors:  Kazuma Sakoda; Wataru Yamori; Michael Groszmann; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Influence of diurnal variation in mesophyll conductance on modelled 13C discrimination: results from a field study.

Authors:  Christopher P Bickford; David T Hanson; Nate G McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  The photosynthetic response of tobacco plants overexpressing ice plant aquaporin McMIPB to a soil water deficit and high vapor pressure deficit.

Authors:  Miki Kawase; Yuko T Hanba; Maki Katsuhara
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Enhanced Photosynthesis and Growth in atquac1 Knockout Mutants Are Due to Altered Organic Acid Accumulation and an Increase in Both Stomatal and Mesophyll Conductance.

Authors:  David B Medeiros; Samuel C V Martins; João Henrique F Cavalcanti; Danilo M Daloso; Enrico Martinoia; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Fábio M DaMatta; Alisdair R Fernie; Wagner L Araújo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.