Literature DB >> 18236192

Adjacent segment hypermobility after lumbar spine fusion: no association with progressive degeneration of the segment 5 years after surgery.

Paul Axelsson1, Ragnar Johnsson, Björn Strömqvist.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Increased intradiscal pressure and relative segmental hypermobility are in vitro observations supporting the idea of increased postoperative load being a reason for progressive degeneration of the free mobile segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. These mechanisms have been difficult to confirm in clinical studies, and an alternative theory claims instead that the adjacent segment degeneration follows a natural degenerative course in patients who are predisposed. We examined 9 patients 5 years after lumbar fusion, to assess whether relative hypermobility of the segment adjacent to fusion could be correlated to progressive degeneration of the same segment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 9 patients, all of whom had been treated with a lumbar fusion after a preoperative intervertebral mobility assessment by spinal RSA, were re-examined 5 years after surgery. The intervertebral translations of the vertebra proximal to the fusion were determined by RSA and compared to the mobility of the same lumbar segment before fusion. The disc height and any progressive reduction at the two levels proximal to the one fused were measured on conventional radiographs.
RESULTS: Adjacent segment mobility 5 years after fusion--expressed as mean transverse, vertical, and sagittal translation of the vertebra proximal to fusion--was not significantly changed compared to the mobility measured before surgery. Increased mobility of the segment seen in 5 individual patients was not associated with progressive degeneration of the same segment or to a poor clinical outcome.
INTERPRETATION: Hypermobility of the segment adjacent to fusion is not a general finding. Increased mobility that can be seen in certain individuals does not impair the 5-year result. The significance of mechanical alterations in adjacent segment degeneration is uncertain, and it is possibly overestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18236192     DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  13 in total

1.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Effect of lumbar hybrid instrumentation and rigid fusion on the treated and the adjacent segments. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Akbar; C H Fürstenberg; C Carstens; S Hemmer; C Schilling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; David Volkheimer; John Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Relative Contribution of Upper and Lower Lumbar Spinal Segments to Flexion/Extension: Comparison between Normal Spines and Spines with Disc Disease in Asian Patients.

Authors:  Tarun Bali; Malhar N Kumar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  How does lumbar degenerative disc disease affect the disc deformation at the cephalic levels in vivo?

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Qun Xia; Peter Passias; Weishi Li; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A descriptive study on the adjacent segment degeneration related signs following a lumbar fusion procedure.

Authors:  José Ramírez-Villaescusa; Jesús López-Torres Hidalgo; David Ruiz-Picazo; Antonio Martín-Benlloch
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

7.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Investigation of Alterations in the Lumbar Disc Biomechanics at the Adjacent Segments After Spinal Fusion Using a Combined In Vivo and In Silico Approach.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Thomas Cha; Wei Wang; Runsheng Guo; Guoan Li
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Survival and prognostic analysis of adjacent segments after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Hoon Seok Park; Dae Jung Choi; Kwan Soo Kim; Seung Jin Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 10.  RSA in Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Sulaf Dawood; Klas Halldin; Brian Freeman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.