Literature DB >> 26435797

Relative Contribution of Upper and Lower Lumbar Spinal Segments to Flexion/Extension: Comparison between Normal Spines and Spines with Disc Disease in Asian Patients.

Tarun Bali1, Malhar N Kumar1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution of upper and lower lumbar segments to flexion and extension of the lumbar spine in normal and diseased spines. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The specific contributions of upper and lower lumbar segments during flexion/extension have rarely been reported. Furthermore, no comparisons between the flexion/extension behaviors of normal and diseased spines have been reported until now.
METHODS: Flexion and extension lateral radiographs of 52 adult, asymptomatic volunteers, and 67 adult patients with lumbar spine disc disease were measured using software for total lumbar lordosis, upper lumbar lordosis and lower lumbar lordosis and the intervertebral angles of all segments.
RESULTS: In asymptomatic volunteers, the range of movement between flexion and extension was a mean of only 4.2° in the lower lumbar spine and a mean of 19.4° in the upper lumbar spine. In patients with disc degeneration, the range of movement between flexion and extension was an average 6.5° for lower lumbar spine and 15.6° for the upper lumbar spine.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that upper lumbar spine contributes more to the range of motion in flexion and extension than the lower lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals without lumbar disc disease, as well as in patients with disc degeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intervertebral disc degeneration; Intervertebral disc disease; Lordosis; Lumbar vertebrae; Lumbosacral region

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435797      PMCID: PMC4591450          DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Spine J        ISSN: 1976-1902


  20 in total

1.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Chou; Chien-Jen Hsu; Wei-Ning Chang; Chi-Yin Wong
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance.

Authors:  Gérard Morvan; Philippe Mathieu; Valérie Vuillemin; Henri Guerini; Philippe Bossard; Frédéric Zeitoun; Marc Wybier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The ratio of upper lumbar to lower lumbar sagittal mobility related to age, sex, and low back trouble.

Authors:  A K Burton
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1987-10

4.  Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; F Rohlmann; C Ring; C Mack; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Mimura; M M Panjabi; T R Oxland; J J Crisco; I Yamamoto; A Vasavada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis.

Authors:  S J Troyanovich; R Cailliet; T J Janik; D D Harrison; D E Harrison
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-10

9.  Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Akamaru; Norio Kawahara; S Tim Yoon; Akihito Minamide; Keun Su Kim; Katsuro Tomita; William C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Survival and prognostic analysis of adjacent segments after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Hoon Seok Park; Dae Jung Choi; Kwan Soo Kim; Seung Jin Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Is L5-S1 motion segment different from the rest? A radiographic kinematic assessment of 72 patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ashutosh B Sabnis; Uphar Chamoli; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.