Literature DB >> 18234439

Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion.

Haisen S Li1, Indrin J Chetty, Charles A Enke, Ryan D Foster, Twyla R Willoughby, Patrick A Kupellian, Timothy D Solberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze characteristics of intrafraction prostate motion, monitored using the Calypso system, and investigate dosimetric consequences of the motion for different clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Motion characteristics were analyzed for 1,267 tracking sessions and 35 patients. Using prostate-PTV margins of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 mm, dose metrics for the prostate gland, bladder, and rectum were evaluated for scenarios including patient population, individual patients showing the greatest motion during the course of treatment, and the individual session with the largest overall movement. Composite dose distributions incorporating motion blurring were calculated by convolving static intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans with corresponding motion probability functions.
RESULTS: For prostate-PTV margins of 2 mm or greater, intrafraction motion did not compromise prostate dose coverage for either the patient population or individual patients. For the patient showing the largest overall movement, the prostate equivalent uniform dose was reduced by only 17.4 cGy (0.23%), and the minimum prostate dose remained greater than 95% of the nominal dose. For margins less than 2 mm, the prostate dose-volume histogram in the same patient was slightly compromised, and the equivalent uniform dose was reduced by 38.5 cGy (0.51%). Sparing of the bladder and rectum was improved substantially by reducing margins.
CONCLUSIONS: Although significant motion can be observed during individual fractions, the dosimetric consequences are insignificant during a typical course of radiotherapy (30-40 fractions) with CTV-PTV margins of 2 mm or greater provided that the Calypso system is applied for pretreatment localization. Further reduction of the margin is possible if intrafraction realignment is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234439     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  Motion-compensated estimation of delivered dose during external beam radiation therapy: implementation in Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system.

Authors:  Shyam Bharat; Parag Parikh; Camille Noel; Michael Meltsner; Karl Bzdusek; Michael Kaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Reduction of dosimetric impact of intrafractional prostate motion during helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  V Prokic; H Geinitz; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  A simulation technique for computation of the dosimetric effects of setup, organ motion and delineation uncertainties in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Mir Hosseini-Ashrafi; Antony Palmer; Honghai Liu; David J Brown
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The impact of leaf width and plan complexity on DMLC tracking of prostate intensity modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per Rugaard Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Optimized hybrid megavoltage-kilovoltage imaging protocol for volumetric prostate arc therapy.

Authors:  Wu Liu; Rodney D Wiersma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; J James Gordon; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Paul Keall; Esben Schjodt Worm; Walther Fledelius; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dosimetric benefit of DMLC tracking for conventional and sub-volume boosted prostate intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per R Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Peter Meidahl Petersen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Image guided dose escalated prostate radiotherapy: still room to improve.

Authors:  Jarad M Martin; Andrew Bayley; Robert Bristow; Peter Chung; Mary Gospodarowicz; Cynthia Menard; Michael Milosevic; Tara Rosewall; Padraig R Warde; Charles N Catton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.