Literature DB >> 18234068

Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model.

Yeon S Lee1, Jong K Seon, Vladimir I Shin, Gyu-Ha Kim, Moongu Jeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both CT and MRI are complementary to each other in that CT can produce a distinct contour of bones, and MRI can show the shape of both ligaments and bones. It will be ideal to build a CT-MRI combined model to take advantage of complementary information of each modality. This study evaluated the accuracy of the combined femoral model in terms of anatomical inspection.
METHODS: Six normal porcine femora (180 +/- 10 days, 3 lefts and 3 rights) with ball markers were scanned by CT and MRI. The 3D/3D registration was performed by two methods, i.e. the landmark-based 3 points-to-3 points and the surface matching using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. The matching accuracy of the combined model was evaluated with statistical global deviation and locally measure anatomical contour-based deviation. Statistical analysis to assess any significant difference between accuracies of those two methods was performed using univariate repeated measures ANOVA with the Turkey post hoc test.
RESULTS: This study revealed that the local 2D contour-based measurement of matching deviation was 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm in the femoral condyle, and in the middle femoral shaft. The global 3D contour matching deviation of the landmark-based matching was 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm, but local 2D contour deviation through anatomical inspection was much larger as much as 3.0 +/- 1.8 mm.
CONCLUSION: Even with human-factor derived errors accumulated from segmentation of MRI images, and limited image quality, the matching accuracy of CT-&-MRI combined 3D models was 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm in terms of local anatomical inspection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234068      PMCID: PMC2265715          DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-7-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Eng Online        ISSN: 1475-925X            Impact factor:   2.819


  19 in total

1.  Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  A new method to compare planned and achieved position of an orthopaedic implant.

Authors:  Florin Popescu; Marco Viceconti; Erika Grazi; Angelo Cappello
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Three-dimensional reconstruction and fusion for multi-modality spinal images.

Authors:  Yuan-Tsung Chen; Ming-Shi Wang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building.

Authors:  Martin A Styner; Kumar T Rajamani; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Gabriel Zsemlye; Gábor Székely; Chris J Taylor; Rhodri H Davies
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07

5.  Combining anatomy and function: the future of medical imaging.

Authors:  P J Roach; D L Bailey
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.048

6.  Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: laboratory validation and clinical experience.

Authors:  B Ma; R E Ellis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  A robust point-matching algorithm for autoradiograph alignment.

Authors:  A Rangarajan; H Chui; E Mjolsness; S Pappu; L Davachi; P Goldman-Rakic; J Duncan
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Keun-Soo Sohn; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Multimodal and three-dimensional imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhenghong Lee; D Bruce Sodee; Martin Resnick; Gregory T Maclennan
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Non-rigid registration of a 3D ultrasound and a MR image data set of the female pelvic floor using a biomechanical model.

Authors:  Janko F Verhey; Josef Wisser; Simon K Warfield; Jan Rexilius; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  15 in total

1.  Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Saker Khamaisy; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Ran Thein; Brian P Gladnick; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Personalized models of bones based on radiographic photogrammetry.

Authors:  E Berthonnaud; R Hilmi; J Dimnet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The accuracy of ultrashort echo time MRI sequences for medical additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Maureen van Eijnatten; Erik-Jan Rijkhorst; Mark Hofman; Tymour Forouzanfar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Can MRI accurately detect pilon articular malreduction? A quantitative comparison between CT and 3T MRI bone models.

Authors:  Shairah Radzi; Constantin Edmond Dlaska; Gary Cowin; Mark Robinson; Jit Pratap; Michael Andreas Schuetz; Sanjay Mishra; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

5.  Graft tension of the posterior cruciate ligament using a finite element model.

Authors:  Young-Jin Seo; Si Young Song; In Sung Kim; Myeong Jae Seo; Yoon Sang Kim; Yon-Sik Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Dual-Mode Tumor Imaging Using Probes That Are Responsive to Hypoxia-Induced Pathological Conditions.

Authors:  S A Amali S Subasinghe; Robia G Pautler; Md Abul Hassan Samee; Jason T Yustein; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Jun Y Lee; Chuck E Spritzer; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D.

Authors:  Shairah Radzi; Gary Cowin; Mark Robinson; Jit Pratap; Andrew Volp; Michael A Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

9.  Comparison of cartilage and bone morphological models of the ankle joint derived from different medical imaging technologies.

Authors:  Gilda Durastanti; Alberto Leardini; Sorin Siegler; Stefano Durante; Alberto Bazzocchi; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-08

10.  Portable document format file showing the surface models of cadaver whole body.

Authors:  Dong Sun Shin; Min Suk Chung; Jin Seo Park; Hyung Seon Park; Sangho Lee; Young Lae Moon; Hae Gwon Jang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.