Literature DB >> 23851970

Graft tension of the posterior cruciate ligament using a finite element model.

Young-Jin Seo1, Si Young Song, In Sung Kim, Myeong Jae Seo, Yoon Sang Kim, Yon-Sik Yoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse the change in length and tension of the reconstructed single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with three different femoral tunnels at different knee flexion angles by use of three-dimensional finite element method.
METHODS: The right knees of 12 male subjects were scanned with a high-resolution computed tomography scanner at four different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°). Three types of single-bundle PCL reconstruction were then conducted in a 90° flexion model: femoral tunnels were created in anterolateral (AL), central and posteromedial (PM) regions of the footprint. Length versus flexion curves and tension versus flexion curves were generated.
RESULTS: Between 0° and 90° of knee flexion, changes in length and tension in the PM grafts were not significant. Whereas the lengths and tension of the AL and central grafts significantly increased in the same flexion range. The length and tension of the PM grafts at 135° of knee flexion were significantly higher than those at 90° of knee flexion, whereas the AL and the central grafts showed only slight length changes beyond 90° of flexion. However, the tension of the AL graft increased significantly beyond 90° of flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the graft length, and tension were generally affected by different femoral tunnels and knee flexion angles. In groups with the AL and PM single-bundle reconstruction, the graft tension increased beyond 90° of knee flexion when the graft is tensioned at 90° of flexion. These data suggest that final fixation angle at 90° for the AL or PM graft would induce graft overtension in high knee flexion of 135°. Whereas central graft which is fixed in 90° of flexion is desirable in terms of prevention of graft overtension. Because the graft tension within it was relatively constant beyond 90° of flexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23851970     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2609-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions.

Authors:  Kanchana Rathnayaka; Tony Sahama; Michael A Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 4.  Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  E S Grood; M S Hefzy; T N Lindenfield
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Hatayama; Hiroshi Higuchi; Masashi Kimura; Yasukazu Kobayashi; Hiroto Asagumo; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2006-12

6.  Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion.

Authors:  Ramprasad Papannagari; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung W Nha; Jeremy M Moses; Mohamed Moussa; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods.

Authors:  Claude T Moorman; M Siobhan Murphy Zane; Sanjiv Bansai; Stephen J Cina; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Maria Kyriaki Kaseta
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Tension changes within the bundles of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at different knee flexion angles: a study using a 3-dimensional finite element model.

Authors:  Heon Young Kim; Young-Jin Seo; Hak-Jin Kim; Trung Nguyenn; Nagraj S Shetty; Yon-Sik Yoo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Mechanical characterization of skin-finite deformations.

Authors:  D R Veronda; R A Westmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.

Authors:  K L Markolf; J R Slauterbeck; K L Armstrong; M S Shapiro; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Julio Domenech; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Multiple Looping Technique for Tibial Fixation in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Sang Jun Song; Young Hak Roh; Jae Woo Lee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-01-12

3.  Effects of modified trans-tibial versus trans-portal technique on stress patterns around the femoral tunnel in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with different knee flexion angles using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hyun-Soo Moon; Si Young Song; Ji Ung Oh; Young-Jin Seo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.