Literature DB >> 18229906

Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.

Reiji Teramoto1, Hiroaki Fukunishi.   

Abstract

The evaluation of ligand conformations is a crucial aspect of structure-based virtual screening, and scoring functions play significant roles in it. While consensus scoring (CS) generally improves enrichment by compensating for the deficiencies of each scoring function, the strategy of how individual scoring functions are selected remains a challenging task when few known active compounds are available. To address this problem, we propose feature selection-based consensus scoring (FSCS), which performs supervised feature selection with docked native ligand conformations to select complementary scoring functions. We evaluated the enrichments of five scoring functions (F-Score, D-Score, PMF, G-Score, and ChemScore), FSCS, and RCS (rank-by-rank consensus scoring) for four different target proteins: acetylcholine esterase (AChE), thrombin (thrombin), phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). The results indicated that FSCS was able to select the complementary scoring functions and enhance ligand enrichments and that it outperformed RCS and the individual scoring functions for all target proteins. They also indicated that the performances of the single scoring functions were strongly dependent on the target protein. An especially favorable result with implications for practical drug screening is that FSCS performs well even if only one 3D structure of the protein-ligand complex is known. Moreover, we found that one can infer which scoring functions significantly enrich active compounds by using feature selection before actual docking and that the selected scoring functions are complementary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18229906     DOI: 10.1021/ci700239t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  14 in total

1.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  VoteDock: consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski; Michał Łaźniewski; Marcin von Grotthuss; Leszek Rychlewski; Krzysztof Ginalski
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.

Authors:  Khaled M Elokely; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

7.  Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Shuangye Yin; Xiang S Wang; Shubin Liu; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Combining machine learning systems and multiple docking simulation packages to improve docking prediction reliability for network pharmacology.

Authors:  Kun-Yi Hsin; Samik Ghosh; Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  systemsDock: a web server for network pharmacology-based prediction and analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Yi Hsin; Yukiko Matsuoka; Yoshiyuki Asai; Kyota Kamiyoshi; Tokiko Watanabe; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.