Literature DB >> 18229490

The acronym superiority effect.

Sarah Laszlo1, Kara D Federmeier.   

Abstract

The visual world is replete with noisy, continuous, perceptually variant linguistic information, which fluent readers rapidly translate from percept to meaning. What are the properties the language comprehension system uses as cues to initiate lexical/semantic access in response to some, but not all, orthographic strings? In the behavioral, electromagnetic, and neuropsychological literatures, orthographic regularity and familiarity have been identified as critical factors. Here, we present a study in the Reicher-Wheeler tradition that manipulates these two properties independently through the use of four stimulus categories: familiar and orthographically regular words, unfamiliar but regular pseudowords, unfamiliar illegal strings, and familiar but orthographically illegal acronyms. We find that, like letters in words and pseudowords, letters in acronyms enjoy an identification benefit relative to similarly illegal, but unfamiliar strings. This supports theories of visual word recognition in which familiarity, rather than orthographic regularity, plays a critical role in gating processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229490      PMCID: PMC2704149          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

Review 1.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  G Jobard; F Crivello; N Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: implications for theories of N400 and word recognition.

Authors:  Diana Deacon; Anna Dynowska; Walter Ritter; Jillian Grose-Fifer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception.

Authors:  Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger; Tim O'Rourke
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Better the DVL you know: acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single-word reading.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

7.  Infection, frequency, and the word superiority effect.

Authors:  H Günther; S Gfroerer; L Weiss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984

8.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.

Authors:  D E Rumelhart; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; M Millis-Wright
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.

Authors:  T H Carr; B J Davidson; H L Hawkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  A new perspective on visual word processing efficiency.

Authors:  Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend; Christopher Donkin
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Minding the PS, queues, and PXQs: uniformity of semantic processing across multiple stimulus types.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of word and pseudoword superiority effects in 7- and 11-year-olds.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra; Elyse George
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Elizabeth R Schotter; Raymond W Berry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  From gr8 to great: Lexical Access to SMS Shortcuts.

Authors:  Lesya Y Ganushchak; Andrea Krott; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 7.  SearCh for humourIstic and Extravagant acroNyms and Thoroughly Inappropriate names For Important Clinical trials (SCIENTIFIC): qualitative and quantitative systematic study.

Authors:  Anton Pottegård; Maija Bruun Haastrup; Tore Bjerregaard Stage; Morten Rix Hansen; Kasper Søltoft Larsen; Peter Martin Meegaard; Line Haugaard Vrdlovec Meegaard; Henrik Horneberg; Charlotte Gils; Dorthe Dideriksen; Lise Aagaard; Anna Birna Almarsdottir; Jesper Hallas; Per Damkier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-12-16

8.  Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.

Authors:  Susanne Eisenhauer; Christian J Fiebach; Benjamin Gagl
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-05-09

9.  A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.

Authors:  Cristina Izura; David Playfoot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-09

10.  Simulation and annotation of global acronyms.

Authors:  Maxim Filimonov; Daphné Chopard; Irena Spasić
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.931

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.