Cindy Welch1, Carl W Miller, Nadine T James. 1. School of Nursing, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-0001, USA. cindy.welch@usm.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic and health-related determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening behaviors and evaluate progress toward Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives. DESIGN: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005 data served as the numerical predicate for identifying or validating sociodemographic and health-related quality of life predictors, or both, and for determining any relative progress. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Eleven U.S. states (n = 27,625 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening and assessment of progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives 3-11 and 3-13. RESULTS: Nine significant predictors of annual Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening (reported as odds ratios) were identified through regression analysis: adequate health care coverage, nonsmoking, age between 40 and 64 years, age greater than or equal to 65 years, no activity limitations, Black, non-Hispanic race, income greater than or equal to $35K, current exercise performance, and no risk for high blood cholesterol. Also, Healthy People 2010 objective 3-11 was not met; however, objective 3-13 was exceeded by 2.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The national health initiatives appear to benefit select American women (overall declining mortality rates from breast and cervical cancer); however, there seems to be a negative economy of scale with respect to age-as age increases, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening declines and morbidity/mortality increases. Given this disparity, as of 2005, related Healthy People 2010 objectives remain unrealized.
OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic and health-related determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening behaviors and evaluate progress toward Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives. DESIGN: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005 data served as the numerical predicate for identifying or validating sociodemographic and health-related quality of life predictors, or both, and for determining any relative progress. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Eleven U.S. states (n = 27,625 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening and assessment of progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives 3-11 and 3-13. RESULTS: Nine significant predictors of annual Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening (reported as odds ratios) were identified through regression analysis: adequate health care coverage, nonsmoking, age between 40 and 64 years, age greater than or equal to 65 years, no activity limitations, Black, non-Hispanic race, income greater than or equal to $35K, current exercise performance, and no risk for high blood cholesterol. Also, Healthy People 2010 objective 3-11 was not met; however, objective 3-13 was exceeded by 2.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The national health initiatives appear to benefit select American women (overall declining mortality rates from breast and cervical cancer); however, there seems to be a negative economy of scale with respect to age-as age increases, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening declines and morbidity/mortality increases. Given this disparity, as of 2005, related Healthy People 2010 objectives remain unrealized.
Authors: Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ana P Ortiz; Sarah Hebl; Ruby Serrano; María E Fernandez; Erick Suárez; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 3.017