Literature DB >> 18226157

Sociodemographic and health-related determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening behavior, 2005.

Cindy Welch1, Carl W Miller, Nadine T James.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic and health-related determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening behaviors and evaluate progress toward Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives.
DESIGN: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005 data served as the numerical predicate for identifying or validating sociodemographic and health-related quality of life predictors, or both, and for determining any relative progress. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Eleven U.S. states (n = 27,625 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening and assessment of progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives 3-11 and 3-13.
RESULTS: Nine significant predictors of annual Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening (reported as odds ratios) were identified through regression analysis: adequate health care coverage, nonsmoking, age between 40 and 64 years, age greater than or equal to 65 years, no activity limitations, Black, non-Hispanic race, income greater than or equal to $35K, current exercise performance, and no risk for high blood cholesterol. Also, Healthy People 2010 objective 3-11 was not met; however, objective 3-13 was exceeded by 2.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The national health initiatives appear to benefit select American women (overall declining mortality rates from breast and cervical cancer); however, there seems to be a negative economy of scale with respect to age-as age increases, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening declines and morbidity/mortality increases. Given this disparity, as of 2005, related Healthy People 2010 objectives remain unrealized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18226157     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  13 in total

1.  The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Documet; Todd M Bear; Jason D Flatt; Laura Macia; Jeanette Trauth; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Inequalities in health and health service utilisation among reproductive age women in St. Petersburg, Russia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tatiana Dubikaytis; Meri Larivaara; Olga Kuznetsova; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Expanding the scope of nursing research in low resource and middle resource countries, regions, and states focused on cervical cancer prevention, early detection, and control.

Authors:  Sandra Millon Underwood; Edith Ramsay-Johnson; Asante Dean; Jori Russ; Ruth Ivalis
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2009-12

4.  The relationship between four health-related quality-of-life indicators and use of mammography and Pap test screening in US women.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Jon Amastae; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Factors associated with cervical cancer screening in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Ana P Ortiz; Sarah Hebl; Ruby Serrano; María E Fernandez; Erick Suárez; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Factors associated with use of breast cancer screening services by women aged >or= 40 years in Korea: the third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 (KNHANES III).

Authors:  Kiheon Lee; Hyung Taek Lim; Sang Min Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Factors associated with use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Hyung-Taek Lim; Kiheon Lee; Be-Long Cho; Min-Sun Park; Ki-Young Son; Sang-Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.