Literature DB >> 18222427

Natural history of varicocele management in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Armand Zini1, Jason Boman, Abdulaziz Baazeem, Keith Jarvi, Jamie Libman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of infertile couples with varicocele.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Six hundred ten consecutive infertile couples in whom the man was found to have a clinical varicocele. INTERVENTION(S): Microsurgical varicocelectomy and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs; intrauterine insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical characteristics, pregnancy rates, and ART utilization in two subgroups of couples (those who elected to undergo varicocelectomy and those who did not). RESULT(S): Sixty percent of the couples (363/610) opted for varicocele repair. The surgical and nonsurgical groups had comparable ages and duration of infertility. However, sperm concentration and motility were significantly lower in the surgical group, compared with in the observation one. As well, the surgical group had a significantly higher prevalence of primary infertility (80% vs. 71%) and had significantly smaller testicles bilaterally. Utilization of ART was significantly higher in the observation group compared with the surgical group (54% vs. 38%). Overall pregnancy rates (spontaneous + assisted pregnancies) in the observation and surgical group were not significantly different. CONCLUSION(S): This study suggests that men with poorer baseline characteristics are more likely to opt for varicocele repair. Furthermore, couples electing not to repair the varicocele are more likely to undergo ART procedures to improve their chances of conception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222427     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  The benefits of varicocele repair for achieving pregnancy in male infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ponco Birowo; William Tendi; Indah Suci Widyahening; Widi Atmoko; Nur Rasyid
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-11-05

3.  An Infertile Couple's Long and Expensive Path to Varicocele Repair.

Authors:  Adithya Balasubramanian; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Jason M Scovell; Jonathan Lo; Byung Ji; Elizabeth L Godfrey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in men with treated and untreated varicocele: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Varicocele management in the era of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Piyush Pathak; Aravind Chandrashekar; Tariq S Hakky; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of varicocele surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Kelly A Chiles; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Prognostic factors for a favorable outcome after varicocele repair in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Mary K Samplaski; Keith A Jarvi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Role of varicocele treatment in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Mehmet G Sönmez; Ahmet H Haliloğlu
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.