Literature DB >> 18220766

Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: a beaten field?

Maria Kontoyianni1, Prakash Madhav, Eric Suchanek, William Seibel.   

Abstract

In this review, several aspects of virtual screening are presented. Although, docking and scoring have been the most widely employed techniques, ligand-based virtual screening has also gained momentum in recent years. We have classified the docking programs into four categories, based on their underline theories, and accordingly describe the most up-to-date algorithms and newest versions. Similarly, three categories of scoring functions are presented, while their weighting schemes on particular binding terms are discussed. The latter is important, since knowledge of the function can be used to select the ones that could be more appropriate for targets of similar nature. Challenging aspects, such as protein flexibility and practices to select the most appropriate docking/scoring schemes, are also discussed. Finally, a real-life example is presented where a pharmacophore-driven approach combined with a docking exercise were undertaken in an iterative manner to successfully enhance the virtual screening hit rates. In the end, we present our own perspective for best practices in the field based on our experiences.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18220766     DOI: 10.2174/092986708783330566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase?

Authors:  Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Robust optimization of scoring functions for a target class.

Authors:  Markus H J Seifert
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Accessible haptic technology for drug design applications.

Authors:  Nicola Zonta; Ian J Grimstead; Nick J Avis; Andrea Brancale
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 4.  Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Xuan-Yu Meng; Hong-Xing Zhang; Mihaly Mezei; Meng Cui
Journal:  Curr Comput Aided Drug Des       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.606

Review 5.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.

Authors:  Octav Caldararu; Martin A Olsson; Majda Misini Ignjatović; Meiting Wang; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Assessing the stability of free-energy perturbation calculations by performing variations in the method.

Authors:  Francesco Manzoni; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Emerging methods for ensemble-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Wilfred W Li
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Docking, virtual high throughput screening and in silico fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Vincent Zoete; Aurélien Grosdidier; Olivier Michielin
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  A simple method for finding a protein's ligand-binding pockets.

Authors:  Seyed Majid Saberi Fathi; Jack A Tuszynski
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2014-07-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.