Literature DB >> 18218052

Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in the rabbit tibia.

Patricia Miranda Burgos1, Lars Rasmusson, Luiz Meirelles, Lars Sennerby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown the formation of more bone contacts with a moderately rough and porous titanium surface, created by anodic oxidation, as compared with nonmodified turned titanium control surfaces. The mechanisms leading to a stronger bone response to oxidized titanium are not well understood.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe the early events of bone integration of titanium implants with oxidized and turned surfaces.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine adult New Zealand White rabbits and 18 implants were used in the study. One oxidized and one turned threaded titanium implants, which had been placed in the right tibial metaphysis, were analyzed in the present study. The implants were retrieved after 7, 14, and 28 days for light microscopic examination and histomorphometric measurements in ground sections.
RESULTS: Integration of oxidized implants was seen to occur as direct bone formation on the surface, while the integration of turned implants was a result of bone ingrowth from preexisting bone and bone marrow. For oxidized implants, an almost acellular, darkly stained layer was seen after 7 to 14 days, which later became populated with osteoblasts. The presence of osteoid seams indicated appositional bone growth from the substrate toward the surrounding tissues. The bone contact values were higher for oxidized implants, and the bone area values were higher for turned implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the idea that implant surface modification alters the bone tissue response to titanium. The early bone formation following surgery occurs directly on the moderately rough oxidized surface, while turned titanium surfaces are integrated by the ingrowth of bone from the adjacent bone marrow and preexisting bone tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18218052     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  14 in total

1.  Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of longitudinal bone density changes around immediate loading implants: a pilot study.

Authors:  L S Carneiro; H A da Cunha; C R Leles; E F Mendonça
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effect of loading time on the survival rate of anodic oxidized implants: prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Hyun-Sik Park; June-Sung Shim; Jung-Won Hwang; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

4.  Osseointegration of a New, Ultrahydrophilic and Nanostructured Dental Implant Surface: A Comparative In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Andreas Pabst; Ashraf Asran; Steffen Lüers; Markus Laub; Christopher Holfeld; Victor Palarie; Daniel G E Thiem; Philipp Becker; Amely Hartmann; Diana Heimes; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 5.  Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineered bone tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Gardin Chiara; Ferroni Letizia; Favero Lorenzo; Stellini Edoardo; Stomaci Diego; Sivolella Stefano; Bressan Eriberto; Zavan Barbara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Investigation of anodized titanium implants coated with triterpenoids extracted from black cohosh: an animal study.

Authors:  In-Phill Park; Tae-Joo Kang; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Ju-Han Kim; Joo-Hee Lee; Shin-Jae Lee; Seong-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  Dental implant bioactive surface modifications and their effects on osseointegration: a review.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wan Meng; Esther Yun Chien; Hua-Hong Chien
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2016-12-14

8.  A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla.

Authors:  Jakob Zwaan; Leonardo Vanden Bogaerde; Herman Sahlin; Lars Sennerby
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09

9.  Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abeer Ahmed; Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed; Mohammed Badwelan; Hamdan S Alghamdi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-12-24

10.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading.

Authors:  David Gelb; Bradley McAllister; Pirkka Nummikoski; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.