Literature DB >> 18214027

Videofluoroscopic evaluation in oropharyngeal swallowing after radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Hiroyuki Kato1, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Makoto Sakai, Akihiko Sano, Naritaka Tanaka, Hitoshi Kimura, Takanori Inose, Ahmad Faried, Kana Saito, Makoto Sohda, Masanobu Nakajima, Yasuyuki Fukai, Norihiro Masuda, Minoru Fukuchi, Ryokuhei Manda, Hitoshi Ojima, Katsuhiko Tsukada, Hiroyuki Kuwano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After esophagectomy a swallowing abnormality is the predominant symptom for esophageal cancer. The aims of this study were to examine (i) oropharyngeal swallowing by comparing pre- and postoperative period, and (ii) the relationship between oropharyngeal swallowing and the alimentary reconstruction route after esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 27 patients in the upright position using videofluoroscopy in the lateral projection. Each patient was studied during 10 mL barium swallows in the pre- and post-operative period.
RESULTS: Of the 27 patients studied, alimentary reconstruction with the retrosternal route (RS group) was performed in 8 patients, that with posterior mediastinal route (PM group) in 8 patients, and the intrathoracic (IT group) esophagogastrostomy inside the posterior mediastinum in 11 patients. With regard to the maximal extent of structural movement, the superior and anterior excursion of the hyoid bone was significantly reduced postoperatively among all groups. The maximal extent of the cricopharyngeal opening was significantly reduced postoperatively in the RS group, but not in the IT group. The changes in the peri-operative structural movement were the lowest in the RS group.
CONCLUSION: A new-onset oropharyngeal swallowing abnormality following retrosternal reconstruction after esophagectomy may have appeared because the change in the peri-operative movement was the lowest. The results of the swallowing evaluation using videofluoroscopy suggest that to avoid oropharyngeal swallowing abnormalities the intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis with posterior mediastinal route should be chosen as reconstruction after esophagectomy if possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18214027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

1.  Functional outcome assessment of swallowing (FOAMS) scoring and videofluoroscopic evaluation of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation in radical esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Okumura; Yutaka Shimada; Toru Watanabe; Naomi Nakamichi; Takuya Nagata; Kazuhiro Tsukada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Recent progress in perioperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Akihiko Okamura; Tasuku Toihata; Kotaro Yamashita; Masami Yuda; Masaru Hayami; Ian Fukudome; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.230

3.  Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Ryotaro Kozuki; Masayuki Watanabe; Tasuku Toihata; Keita Takahashi; Reiko Otake; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and rehabilitative intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Kaneoka; S Yang; H Inokuchi; R Ueha; H Yamashita; T Nito; Y Seto; N Haga
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Risk factors and long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with postoperative dysphagia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Takahito Sugase; Hiroshi Miyata; Keijiro Sugimura; Takashi Kanemura; Tomohira Takeoka; Masaaki Yamamoto; Naoki Shinno; Hisashi Hara; Takeshi Omori; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Prevalence, nature and trajectory of dysphagia postoesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective longitudinal study protocol.

Authors:  Michelle Hayes; Anna Gillman; Brona Wright; Sean Dorgan; Ian Brennan; Margaret Walshe; Claire Donohoe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Comparison of the outcomes between thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy via retrosternal and prevertebral lifting paths by the same surgeon.

Authors:  Bing Lv; Yong-Zhong Tao; Yu Zhu; Jing Wu; Bin Zhong; Fu-Chao Luo; Yang Liu; Ze-Xue Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of reflux after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Samina Park; Chang Hyun Kang; Hyun Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 10.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.