Literature DB >> 18212332

Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women.

Elizabeth J Parks-Stamm1, Madeline E Heilman, Krystle A Hearns.   

Abstract

Two studies tested the hypothesis that females penalize women who succeed in male gender-typed jobs to salvage their own self-views regarding competence. The authors proposed that women are motivated to penalize successful women (i.e., characterize them as unlikable and interpersonally hostile) to minimize the self-evaluative consequences of social comparison with a highly successful female target. Results supported the hypothesis. Whereas both male and female participants penalized successful women, blocking this penalization reduced female--but not male--participants' self-ratings of competence (Study 1). Moreover, positive feedback provided to female participants about their potential to succeed (Study 2) weakened negative reactions to successful women without costs to subsequent self-ratings of competence. These results suggest that the interpersonal derogation of successful women by other women functions as a self-protective strategy against threatening upward social comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18212332     DOI: 10.1177/0146167207310027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  8 in total

1.  Psychological symptoms linking exposure to community violence and academic functioning in African American adolescents.

Authors:  Danielle R Busby; Sharon F Lambert; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-01-01

2.  The Future of Women in Psychological Science.

Authors:  June Gruber; Jane Mendle; Kristen A Lindquist; Toni Schmader; Lee Anna Clark; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Modupe Akinola; Lauren Atlas; Deanna M Barch; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Jessica L Borelli; Tiffany N Brannon; Silvia A Bunge; Belinda Campos; Jessica Cantlon; Rona Carter; Adrienne R Carter-Sowell; Serena Chen; Michelle G Craske; Amy J C Cuddy; Alia Crum; Lila Davachi; Angela L Duckworth; Sunny J Dutra; Naomi I Eisenberger; Melissa Ferguson; Brett Q Ford; Barbara L Fredrickson; Sherryl H Goodman; Alison Gopnik; Valerie Purdie Greenaway; Kate L Harkness; Mikki Hebl; Wendy Heller; Jill Hooley; Lily Jampol; Sheri L Johnson; Jutta Joormann; Katherine D Kinzler; Hedy Kober; Ann M Kring; Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Tania Lombrozo; Stella F Lourenco; Kateri McRae; Joan K Monin; Judith T Moskowitz; Misaki N Natsuaki; Gabriele Oettingen; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Nicole Prause; Darby Saxbe; Pamela K Smith; Barbara A Spellman; Virginia Sturm; Bethany A Teachman; Renee J Thompson; Lauren M Weinstock; Lisa A Williams
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Perceptions of Pressures to Alter or Misrepresent Time Allocation Among Clinician-Researchers With NIH Career Development Awards.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle D Jones; Christina Mangurian; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  What drives female objectification? An investigation of appearance-based interpersonal perceptions and the objectification of women.

Authors:  Dax J Kellie; Khandis R Blake; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Population Preference of Surgeon's Gender for Surgical Care and Their Attitudes Toward Female Surgeons in Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Layla M Alkhaldi; Abeer I Alsulaimani; Wahaj A Altalhi; Ghaida M Alghamdi; Noura N Alqurashi; Tamer M Abdelrahman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-14

6.  Hurting all the way: The emotional antecedent and consequence of social rejection.

Authors:  Xiaoying Wang; Miaomiao Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

7.  Our Grandmothers' Legacy: Challenges Faced by Female Ancestors Leave Traces in Modern Women's Same-Sex Relationships.

Authors:  Tania A Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?

Authors:  Núria Rovira-Asenjo; Agnieszka Pietraszkiewicz; Sabine Sczesny; Tània Gumí; Roger Guimerà; Marta Sales-Pardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.