Literature DB >> 31625999

Perceptions of Pressures to Alter or Misrepresent Time Allocation Among Clinician-Researchers With NIH Career Development Awards.

Michelle H Moniz1, Kent A Griffith, Rochelle D Jones, Christina Mangurian, Reshma Jagsi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: National Institutes of Health career development (K) awards mandate specific allocations of effort to research and training. The authors sought to understand pressures perceived by award recipients to change or misrepresent effort, and whether these perceptions differed by gender.
METHOD: In 2010-2011 and 2014, the authors surveyed K08 and K23 award recipients. Questions evaluated perceived pressure to change or misrepresent time allocation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of pressure to misrepresent effort evaluated associations with individual and basic job characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 1,719 faculty in the initial target population, 493 women and 573 men (1,066, 62%) responded at both time points. Most respondents reported feeling pressure to increase time spent on professional activities other than their K award-related research or career development or to decrease time on their K award-related research. The likelihood of perceiving pressure differed significantly by gender: 68% of women vs 55% of men (P < .001). A minority reported perceiving pressure to misrepresent professional time (women, 29%, vs men, 27%, P = .52). Multivariable analysis revealed that pressure to misrepresent professional time was less likely among respondents at institutions with the most extramural funding (P = .02). A significant pairwise interaction between gender and K award type suggested that female K08 awardees had higher odds than male peers of perceiving pressure to misrepresent time.
CONCLUSIONS: Most K award recipients reported feeling pressure to do more non-K award-related activities. More than a quarter reported feeling pressure to misrepresent effort. Additional research is needed to evaluate the proportion of academic medical faculty who actually misrepresent professional effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31625999      PMCID: PMC7343134          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  22 in total

1.  Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Rochelle DeCastro; Kent A Griffith; Soumya Rangarajan; Cristina Churchill; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Elizabeth A Guancial; Cynthia Cooper Worobey; Lori E Henault; Yuchiao Chang; Rebecca Starr; Nancy J Tarbell; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  An Innovative Program to Support Gender Equity and Success in Academic Medicine: Early Experiences From the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Rochelle D Jones; Kent A Griffith; Kathleen T Brady; Ann J Brown; Randal D Davis; Amelia F Drake; Daniel Ford; Victoria J Fraser; Katherine E Hartmann; Judith S Hochman; Susan Girdler; Anne M Libby; Christina Mangurian; Judith G Regensteiner; Kimberly Yonkers; Sindy Escobar-Alvarez; Elizabeth R Myers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Factors Associated With Success of Clinician-Researchers Receiving Career Development Awards From the National Institutes of Health: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle D Jones; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Gender differences in resources and negotiation among highly motivated physician-scientists.

Authors:  Emma Holliday; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle De Castro; Abigail Stewart; Peter Ubel; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies.

Authors:  L Nonnemaker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Mentoring and the career satisfaction of male and female academic medical faculty.

Authors:  Rochelle DeCastro; Kent A Griffith; Peter A Ubel; Abigail Stewart; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Patterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Melissa Dattalo; Caitlin Regner; Amarette Filut; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers.

Authors:  Shruti Jolly; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle DeCastro; Abigail Stewart; Peter Ubel; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.