Literature DB >> 18212236

Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer.

Shu-Huei Shen1, Yi-You Chiou, Jia-Hwia Wang, Ming-Shyen Yen, Rheun-Chuan Lee, Chiung-Ru Lai, Cheng-Yen Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine the feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with a single-shot echo-planar sequence and parallel technique for depicting endometrial cancer and to examine the role of this technique in preoperative assessment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients were recruited for MRI evaluation of suspicious endometrial lesions found on transvaginal sonography. Twenty-four of the patients were proved to have endometrial cancer (patient group), and seven to have benign diseases (control group). The MRI examinations included diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar sequences and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo sequences. The apparent diffusion coefficient of endometrial cancer in the patient group and of normal endometrium in the control group were measured on the apparent diffusion coefficient map of each diffusion-weighted image and compared for the two groups. In the patient group, myometrial invasion was evaluated with the two sequences. The diagnostic accuracy rates of each pulse sequence were compared.
RESULTS: The mean apparent diffusion coefficient of endometrial cancer was 0.864 x 10(-3) mm2/s and that of benign endometrial lesions was 1.277 x 10(-3) mm2/s. The difference between the two groups was significant (p = 0.0058). The diagnostic accuracy for myometrial invasion was 61.9% for DWI and 71.4% for gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-recalled echo images. In five cases, DWI provided information about tumor extent and depicted the tumor focus, findings that changed preoperative staging.
CONCLUSION: DWI performed with parallel imaging technique has potential as a method for differentiating benign from malignant endometrial lesions. It also provides valuable information for preoperative evaluation and should be considered part of routine preoperative MRI evaluation for endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18212236     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  34 in total

1.  Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted and diffusion-tensor imaging of normal and diseased uterus.

Authors:  Duygu Kara Bozkurt; Murat Bozkurt; Mehmet Ali Nazli; Ilhan Nahit Mutlu; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-28

3.  Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging.

Authors:  K Kinkel; R Forstner; F M Danza; L Oleaga; T M Cunha; A Bergman; J O Barentsz; C Balleyguier; B Brkljacic; J A Spencer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5-T.

Authors:  Gilda Rechichi; Stefania Galimberti; Mauro Signorelli; Patrizia Perego; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

6.  ADC maps in the prediction of pelvic lymph nodal metastatic regions in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Gilda Rechichi; Stefania Galimberti; Matteo Oriani; Patrizia Perego; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yashar Moharamzad; Amir H Davarpanah; Ali Yaghobi Joybari; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Leila Esmaeilian Toosi; Melika Kooshkiforooshani; Ali Ansari; Morteza Sanei Taheri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-15

8.  Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Takashi Ota; Masatoshi Hori; Hiromitsu Onishi; Makoto Sakane; Takahiro Tsuboyama; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Atsushi Nakamoto; Tadashi Kimura; Yoshifumi Narumi; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring the chemotherapeutic response of osteosarcoma: a comparison between average apparent diffusion coefficient and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Oka; Toshitake Yakushiji; Hiro Sato; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.